Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto | Azam

Channel

Crypto | Azam

@crypto_azam

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

134,229subscribers

-4,951 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001153086394
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_azam
DescriptionМы не пишем никому в личку! Это единственный канал! В крипте с 2016 года Самый старый большой крипто канал в снг Во всем вопросам @Baycpaycom
Created10 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypto_azam

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@crypto_azam/7901 · this entry30 Jun 2026, 09:51 UTC@crypt_azam/256330 Jun 2026, 09:51 UTC1.00under a minute
@crypto_azam/7902 · this entry5 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC@crypt_azam/25645 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@crypto_azam/7903 · this entry7 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC@crypt_azam/25657 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@crypto_azam/7905 · this entry9 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC@crypt_azam/25689 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC1.00under a minute
@crypto_azam/7907 · this entry11 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC@crypt_azam/256911 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@crypt_azam5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 March 2026 to 11 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @crypto_azam — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

134,229139,180136,704.56 August 2026 — 139,180 subscribers6 August 2026 — 139,180 subscribers6 August 2026 — 139,118 subscribers7 August 2026 — 139,007 subscribers8 August 2026 — 138,846 subscribers9 August 2026 — 138,739 subscribers10 August 2026 — 138,616 subscribers11 August 2026 — 138,474 subscribers12 August 2026 — 138,356 subscribers13 August 2026 — 138,254 subscribers14 August 2026 — 138,059 subscribers16 August 2026 — 137,849 subscribers17 August 2026 — 137,665 subscribers18 August 2026 — 137,513 subscribers19 August 2026 — 137,402 subscribers20 August 2026 — 137,225 subscribers22 August 2026 — 137,035 subscribers23 August 2026 — 136,711 subscribers25 August 2026 — 136,586 subscribers26 August 2026 — 136,422 subscribers27 August 2026 — 136,271 subscribers27 August 2026 — 136,141 subscribers28 August 2026 — 136,054 subscribers29 August 2026 — 135,928 subscribers30 August 2026 — 135,751 subscribers31 August 2026 — 135,612 subscribers1 September 2026 — 135,373 subscribers2 September 2026 — 135,210 subscribers3 September 2026 — 135,009 subscribers5 September 2026 — 134,715 subscribers9 September 2026 — 134,229 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 34 days, net -4,951. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133,486–139,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 04:39134,229-486
5 Sept 2026, 21:38134,715-294
3 Sept 2026, 18:20135,009-201
2 Sept 2026, 13:43135,210-163
1 Sept 2026, 13:15135,373-239
31 Aug 2026, 16:45135,612-139
30 Aug 2026, 19:25135,751-177
29 Aug 2026, 19:55135,928-126
28 Aug 2026, 20:34136,054-87
27 Aug 2026, 22:46136,141-130
27 Aug 2026, 01:36136,271-151
26 Aug 2026, 02:43136,422-164
25 Aug 2026, 03:17136,586-125
23 Aug 2026, 19:45136,711-324
22 Aug 2026, 01:39137,035-190
20 Aug 2026, 17:12137,225-177
19 Aug 2026, 16:56137,402-111
18 Aug 2026, 15:33137,513-152
17 Aug 2026, 13:06137,665-184
16 Aug 2026, 05:16137,849first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 6 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.36%
avg views ÷ 134,229 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,850
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held40 (6 March 20264 September 2026)
Views total99,510
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 04:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,600
Videos
778
Links
5,550

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC≈3,400 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Ровно х2 чистого движения за неделю. К сожалению я вышел на 0.052 думал зайду заново ниже 😂 Жду теперь когда ликвидность перетечет в pump

3 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC≈4,040 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Снова захожу в pump по 0.0044 Ликвидация ниже 0.0040

3 Sept 2026, 15:59 UTC≈3,730 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

+15% чистого движения за час

3 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC≈3,830 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Захожу в dash по 43 Ликвидация не выше 35

3 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC≈3,990 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Фиксирую +25% чистого движения

31 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC≈5,200 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Слежу за токеном Pons уже неделю, когда он был 0.1$ и все ждал отката чтобы закупиться. Но не дают толком. Вынужден признать свою глупость и покупать по текущим в 4 раза дороже. Так как это пока единственный токен приближенный к robinhood chain. У него очень большой потенциал

31 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈5,130 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

23 августа вышел по 0.0051 Сейчас снова захожу по 0.00434

23 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC≈7,130 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Сейчас идет Мега тренд на инфраструктурные проекты, в частности pump, hype, zec и dash. В моменте, pump двигается быстрее, но нужно держать руку на пульсе чтобы вовремя прыгать по этим паравозам

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @crypto_azam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

INVEST ZONE | Khairullin Ruslan
@invest_zonaa · 928,278
#1
Maloletoff | Crypto-Angel
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,777
#2
Crypto Falcon
@falconinvestors · 82,351
#3
001k.Trade
@trade001k · 107,377
#4
Crypto Headlines
@crypto_hd · 132,551
#5
Coin Post – Деньги, инвестиции, биткоин
@Coin_Post · 292,161
#6
Trade by Booba
@trade_by_booba · 50,492
#7
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 335,855
#8
КИТЫ Инвестиций🐋
@kitinvest · 28,695
#9
Антон про крипту
@Anton_cryptoo · 145,955
#10
СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ
@slezisatoshi · 124,400
#11
Crypto Fomo
@crypto_gst · 578,297
#12
Crypto Daily – биткоин, криптовалюта
@cryptodaily · 85,994
#13
DeCenter — блокчейн, биткоин, инвестиции
@DeCenter · 1,849,763
#14
Crypto - TEAM | JEMAN
@crypto_jeman · 673,094
#15
Андрюнин.
@andryuninthelegend · 18,563
#16
Крипто Вестник
@crypto_vestnic · 210,628
#17
Азбука Криптана
@Kripto_Azbuk · 295,848
#18
КриптоАтака 24 ⚡️
@cryptoattack24 · 56,325
#19
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart · 129,867
#20
КриптоБош
@cryptobosh · 150,832
#21
Опять Крипта
@okcrypta1 · 41,999
#22
CryptoSmerkis
@SmerkisCrypto · 18,213
#23
zicelaqo
@zicelaqo · 167,263
#24
Стукач Трейдит
@stukach_trading · 310,868
#25
Эмиль Панахов | IN CRYPTO WE TRUST
@invest_crypto_defi · 22,196
#26
Миллион на Bitcoin 💸 BITVANG
@bitcoin24v · 11,624
#27
Incrypted
@incrypted · 108,568
#28
ForkLog
@forklog · 92,579
#29
Pro Blockchain
@Pro_Blockchain · 161,998
#30
Мой путь к 1🍋$ в крипте
@crypto_Iemon · 75,426
#31
Олег Артемьев | Ленивый инвестор
@ne_investor · 183,990
#32
CRYPTUS MEDIA
@CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 71,946
#33
TonsBase⚡️Live
@tons_base · 492,457
#34
ARUT NEWS
@arutnews · 29,280
#35
Blum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 14,620,017
#36
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · 8,767,658
#37
ПОЛУНИН
@polunintrade7 · 530,056
#38
Ladesov Crypto
@eeusd · 1,156,283
#39
Новости Кошелька
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,133,785
#40
Alex_MVP
@playweb4 · 145,065
#41
Crypto Wolf
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,224,316
#42
одиссея kekius maximus
@doge1 · 646,344
#43
Типичный Инвестор
@eduardinvest · 1,388,582
#44
Maisto
@igormaisto · 103,606
#45
Catapult Extreme
@catapult_extreme · 8,681,649
#46
Банкста
@banksta · 437,929
#47
Сергей Сергиенко
@sergeisergienko · 63,970
#48
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 454,175
#49
Time Farm News CIS
@TimeFarmNewsCIS · 55,397
#50
KostyaKudo
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,909
#51
Россия Вещает | News
@vestirussia · 999,578
#52
AirDrop + Kripto Invest
@mr_bitcoin_game · 35,253
#53
КриптоТапок
@crypto_tappok · 84,050
#54
КриптоСоветник
@crypadvis · 96,153
#55
Финансист | Бизнес | Инвестиции
@finansist_busines · 629,597
#56
HAYZON
@hayzonn · 2,872,476
#57
Крипто Доход
@crypt_income · 75,904
#58
TU Airdrop Daily
@tu_airdrops_daily · 64,820
#59
INSTARDING
@INSTARDING · 96,355
#60
Gram RUS
@toncoin_rus · 529,809
#61
Aziz Halikov
@azizhalikov · 89,633
#62
PIFAGOR TRADE
@pifagortrade · 85,553
#63
Криптопаук 🎆
@CryptoPayk · 156,246
#64
Крипта Скруджа ⚡️
@crypta · 547,575
#65
Investment kingyru 💎
@investkingyru · 1,756,786
#66
Дропы хомяка
@hamsterdropru · 57,986
#67
IKIGAI
@ikigaimain · 98,474
#68
Binance Futures Liquidations
@BinanceLiquidations · 181,252
#69
Мувы Белевского
@belevskmove · 1,093,841
#70
DOGS Community
@dogs · 7,153,713
#71
Hamster Kombat Announcement
@hamster_kombat · 21,187,919
#72
HOT Updates
@hotonnear · 4,730,270
#73
Catizen Announcement
@catizenann · 3,627,625
#74
Wallet News
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,562,582
#75
Trending Apps
@trendingapps · 3,852,638
#76
Gram of TON
@gram · 6,758,414
#77
Time Farm News
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,384,945
#78
Builders
@builders · 3,470,622
#79
PocketFi News
@pocketfi · 1,821,730
#80
Lost Dogs Co Ru
@lostdogscoru · 216,204
#81
Vertus Announcements
@the_vertus · 2,172,866
#82
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,573,924
#83
Pixelverse.xyz News Channel
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,168,605
#84
TON Station
@tonstationgames · 3,234,113
#85
Кресло с подогревом
@kreslospodogrevom · 29,617
#86
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,080,832
#87
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,015,674
#88

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Trade by Booba
@trade_by_booba · 50,492
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
КИТЫ Инвестиций🐋
@kitinvest · 28,695
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
Maloletoff | Crypto-Angel
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,777
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Сергей Сергиенко
@sergeisergienko · 63,970
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
Дмитрий Кокорев | Инвестиции
@kokorevinvest · 101,730
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Dashi Finance
@dashi_finance · 34,298
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Crypto Falcon
@falconinvestors · 82,351
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
ARUT NEWS
@arutnews · 29,280
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Мус и Крипта
@mus_money_official · 45,766
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Опять Крипта
@okcrypta1 · 41,999
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Дмитрий Ткачев| Эксперт криптовалют
@dimatkachevv · 34,431
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Олег Артемьев | Ленивый инвестор
@ne_investor · 183,990
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
CRYPTO GUYS 👽| 😼
@TonGuysNFT · 27,211
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Мир без границ с Кондрашовым
@kondrworld · 54,401
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич
@wallet_with_bitcoins · 87,209
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
Арнольд Криптовалютный
@ArnoldCrypto · 32,100
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Кресло с подогревом
@kreslospodogrevom · 29,617
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026
ПОЛУНИН
@polunintrade7 · 530,056
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
РОМАНОВИЧ
@romanovich_ser · 38,730
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
10 долларов Баффетта
@buff_10 · 60,286
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
KondrashovInvest
@Kondrashovinvest · 37,586
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
CryptoPizza News
@cryptopizza_news · 27,841
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Витрина криптовалют
@crypto_showcase · 48,165
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Чирков Максим
@maxchirtop · 49,786
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto | Azam” (@crypto_azam), 134,229 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_azam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.