Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Salomon’s Whale

Channel

Salomon’s Whale

@salomonzwhale

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

967subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001817986311
TypeChannel
Username@salomonzwhale
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/salomonzwhale

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

967980973.57 August 2026 — 979 subscribers8 August 2026 — 980 subscribers14 August 2026 — 975 subscribers21 August 2026 — 978 subscribers28 August 2026 — 975 subscribers4 September 2026 — 976 subscribers12 September 2026 — 967 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 965–982 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 17:39967-9
4 Sept 2026, 13:41976+1
28 Aug 2026, 13:44975-3
21 Aug 2026, 06:53978+3
14 Aug 2026, 16:04975-5
8 Aug 2026, 07:20980+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:16979first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

220 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁6027.3%
5625.5%
🤝3415.5%
🔥2913.2%
💯167.27%
👍146.36%
custom 521121252752177477062.73%
custom 521293730907843711752.27%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 21:57 UTC182 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну ожидаемо — ставка на месте👍 Уорш был нейтрально-ястребинным. Понравилось что он сказал что для них важен РСЕ. Но тут вмешался рыжий пес и опять начал угрожать Ирану сокрушительным-мега-суперпупер ударом. Отвратный новостной рынок. Вот бы они уже дали по рукам…

👍4🔥2🤝21

29 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC226 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🫡FEEED DAAAY🫡 Сегодня в 22:00 решение по процентной ставке и по-классике спустя 30 минут пресс-конференция с Кевином Уоршем. Ключевая ставка ФРС останется на месте, это практически однозначно (на этом попробуем заработать, ниже кину скрин). Как обычно, более важно послушать что будет говорить свежеиспеченный председатель фед резерва. На предыдущем заседании Уорш говорил, что теперь никаких намеков на дальнейшие ша

🤝43👍2

28 Jul 2026, 06:52 UTC230 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Обстановка последних 6 месяцев в одном видео

😁92💯2

20 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC359 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, вот и закончился ЧМ Поздравляем Испанию с увереннейшей победой над бомжами из Аргентины 🤝 Турнир, о котором говорил, тоже закончился. По итогам я занял 2 место и забираю 2500$. До предпоследнего дня я был на 1 месте, но залетел какой-то лудоман-кретин и поставил две ставки на $580к (обе проебал🤣) и перебил меня в таблице. Ну и 1 место в копитрейдинге за мной. Portex меня порадовал. Очень приятный интерфейс

🔥4😁32🤝2

14 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC323 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Индекс потребительских цен (CPI) (г/г) (июнь) ФАКТ: 3,5% ПРОГНОЗ: 3,8% ПРЕД.: 4,2%

🤝52🔥2

6 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTC456 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если кто-то и жалуется, что дела идут плохо, то это, скорее всего, пара парней, которые играли на понижение – бедняги, им сейчас совсем не сладко, этих шортистов просто сметает. Я никогда не любил таких ребят, потому что они ставят против своей страны.

😁112🔥2

6 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC365 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Более подробно графики разбираю и кидаю у себя в MOB Если вам тоже интересно — накидайте реакций на этот пост.

8custom 52129373090784371175👍4🔥2

6 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC362 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет👋 Кратко и тезисно пройдемся по рынку и основным моментам 1)Фонда и макро: Фондовый рынок находится около хаев, причем по всей ширине рынка, S&P500/NASDAQ/RUSSEL2000 — все вблизи хаев. Нефть снижается, уже ниже 70$. А энергоресурсы были основным пунктом давления на инфляцию. 14 числа выход CPI. На данный момент по ожиданиям ставки заложено повышение ставки в сентябре. У меня хорошие ожидания на выход по

👍4🤝32

6 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC283 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну вы даете, 51/50😁 Я считаю, как и ранее, июль мы увидим зеленым ⬆️

4💯3🤝2custom 52112125275217747701

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @salomonzwhale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

a01k.traders
@trading_001k · 28,525
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
a01k.Crypto
@a01k_crypto · 30,865
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
BFinance — Official Channel
@bfinancepay · 1,267,408
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Salomon’s Whale” (@salomonzwhale), 967 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salomonzwhale.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.