Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MIRROR REFLECTION

Channel

MIRROR REFLECTION

@mirrorreflectionhub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,473subscribers

-89 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001668329082
TypeChannel
Username@mirrorreflectionhub
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mirrorreflectionhub

Growth

7,4737,5627,517.57 August 2026 — 7,562 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,562 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,559 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,552 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,541 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,537 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,532 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,513 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,501 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,488 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,483 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,473 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net -89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,460–7,575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 10:007,473-10
2 Sept 2026, 12:077,483-5
30 Aug 2026, 20:447,488-13
27 Aug 2026, 20:337,501-12
24 Aug 2026, 15:397,513-19
20 Aug 2026, 16:447,532-5
17 Aug 2026, 20:357,537-4
14 Aug 2026, 09:477,541-11
10 Aug 2026, 22:177,552-7
7 Aug 2026, 19:217,559-3
7 Aug 2026, 07:307,562no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:187,562first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 7,473 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.894%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held34 (22 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total16,828
Reactions total144
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 14s
Average length
1m 37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

297 reactions across 31 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 528059506560391839226087.5%
💘3712.5%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 33 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mirrorreflectionhub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC630 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#GER40 в руках Шустрого 🔫 #networks_trades

custom 528059506560391839211💘2

24 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC720 viewsread 28 August 2026

Запись стрима доступна по ссылке 🍸

24 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC840 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Доброе утро. Встречаемся в 11:00 с Никсоном на мк Ссылка будет позже

custom 52805950656039183928

21 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,870 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

"Кароч підфіксав я альтушку уже трошки", – asultartem_49 🍸 В Networks много подобных примеров с крылатыми выражениями. Плавно заходим в осень... #networks_trades

💘14custom 52805950656039183924

20 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC914 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ну и приятные достижения в комьюнити 🐾 #networks_funded

custom 52805950656039183928

20 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,470 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Крипта вчера вспомнила, что люди хотят торговать Больше о Networks #networks

custom 52805950656039183928

17 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC945 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Каким бы ни был понедельник – хочется немного расслабиться 😫 На Twitch посмотрим чарты с Никсоном, а потом легкий киберспорт для тех, кто владеет WASD Twitch 19:00

custom 52805950656039183927

14 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,240 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

USDT → ВАША БАНКОВСКАЯ КАРТА? Можно не тратить нервы на поиск Р2Р мерчанта и подбора подходящих условий. Есть те с кем этот процесс быстрый и надежный. 💲Канал: @m1exchange 😺Менеджер: @m1exchange_manager M1.EX TG BOT | Сайт

custom 52805950656039183926

14 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC≈1,650 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Рынок в последние дни немного огорчил наш чат, но ребята в комьюнити не теряли бдительности +$51 733 профита за два дня в Networks 💸 *эта прибыль не сгенерирована искусственным интеллектом

custom 528059506560391839210

12 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC925 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Обещанный обзор позиции по #GER40 от Шустрого Напоминаем, что у вас ещё есть время присоединиться к сообществу Networks Задать вопрос 👨‍💻 Что такое Networks 🐾

custom 52805950656039183926💘1

11 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC915 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Никсон решил порадовать аудиторию и составил чек-лист того, чем делился за последние два года 😳 Более 20 позиций полезных материалов для трейдеров любого уровня: - Его заметки, торговая стратегия и основные торговые инструменты - Макропрогнозы - Обучающая библиотека Еще больше материалов для трейдеров можно найти в нашем сообществе Набор продолжается, и до его окончания осталось менее 24 часов Задать вопрос/забро

custom 52805950656039183925💘4

11 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC864 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Shystruyyy закрыл позицию по GER40 До этого мы ещё и поднимали тему особенностей его торговли на индексах... Проведём разбор позиции? 🧐

custom 528059506560391839213

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @mirrorreflectionhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

cryptomannn
@cryptomannnisnotacult · 37,688
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
KostyaKudo
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,999
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
Cryptology Key
@CryptologyKey · 48,780
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
Mykola Udianskyi official Channel
@udianskyi · 93,977
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
SANCHO D.T.
@SANCHO_DT · 65,670
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
$PCORN |🍿| on $SOL
@popcornmemesol · 71,472
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
hexdrunker reflections
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,407
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
001k.Trade
@trade001k · 107,628
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Udianskaya/Music 🎶
@musicud21 · 36,921
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
Опять Крипта
@okcrypta1 · 42,020
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MIRROR REFLECTION” (@mirrorreflectionhub), 7,473 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mirrorreflectionhub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.