Судьба крипты в его руках! Какой план у ФРС? Скрытый план Уорша, распродажа бондов и начало эпохи альтсезона https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbLES6AZ6_4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbLES6AZ6_4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbLES6AZ6_4

Channel
MEMEcrypted
@MEMEcrypted
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,099subscribers
+557 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002179783161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MEMEcrypted |
| Description | Для связи/cooperation - @MemeCrypted_support_bot Менеджер/Incrypted+/Runner: @incrypted_plus_manager Чат: @memecrypted_chat Основа: @Incrypted |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MEMEcrypted |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 19,099 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 19,116 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 19,126 | -25 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 19,151 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 19,164 | -20 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 19,184 | -21 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 19,205 | -3,796 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 23,001 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 23,011 | -17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 23,028 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 23,036 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 23,044 | -1,392 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 24,436 | +4,972 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 19,464 | +922 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 18,542 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 18,542 | first reading |
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.81%
- avg views ÷ 19,099 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,490
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.705%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 36
- of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (28 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 50,706 |
| Reactions total | 288 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 681
- Videos
- 56
- Links
- 585
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
288 reactions across 27 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5449683594425410231 | 205 | 71.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 50 | 17.4% | |
| 🦄 | 27 | 9.38% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 2.08% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Рынок вытряхивает всех: что делать на таком рынке? https://youtube.com/live/bWiHnR99Klk Уже завтра в 18:00 проведем стрим, где разберем текущую ситуацию на рынке и поговорим о том, как переживать подобные периоды без лишних потерь и на чем сейчас еще можно зарабатывать. Обсудим: - что сейчас происходит с рынком и почему ситуация может быть опаснее «черного лебедя»; - крах 2026 года — это конец или только начало; -…
🤨 Разбираем те самые 14x на BOLLOCKS (много букoff) Благодарим за активность, ну что ж, начинаем... Вчера Ansem запустили платформу Ansem.io — первый, по его задумке, индекс мемкоинов. Все мемы, которые запускаются берут на себя обязательства по байбеку и сжиганию основного токена ANSEM, а также могут выделять часть собственного саплая на дроп холдерам ANSEM. В зависимости от этих условий проекты распределяются по т…
❤🔥8custom 54496835944254102317🦄4
😘 Накидайте реакций под постом — и мы разберем этот колл уже с практической стороны Детальнее расскажем, почему вообще обратили внимание на BOLLOCKS, какой лор стоял за токеном и какими инструментами пользовались для анализа.
❤🔥31custom 544968359442541023118🦄16⚡6
🤯 Сир, дайте качественный кол Вчера один из пользователей в чате попросили «качественный кол». Apache даже спорить не стал и через несколько минут просто кинул контракт на BOLLOCKS с капой около $53k. За несколько часов токен улетел до $884k, показав почти 14х с кола. В итоге Apache занял первое место среди коллеров за последние 24 часа. Мораль простая: иногда чтобы словить иксы достаточно правильно попросить @apa…
custom 544968359442541023120❤🔥9🦄7
💎 Третий кейс за выходные и +51x в MEMEcrypted+ (3 из 3 отработано!) Бенуа Шено – автор Gunicorn, одного из самых известных Python-серверов в мире. Его продукт используют около 1,6 млн человек, среди компаний сам автор называет Instagram, Reddit, Pinterest, Mozilla, NASA, Spotify, Dropbox, Uber, Airbnb, Heroku и AWS. Вчера вечером он написал, что заходит на Pumpfun вместе со своим проектом. Под эту историю появился…
custom 54496835944254102316❤🔥2
🧠 350% на BEHEMOTH (вторая идея за выходные) Разработчик на BSC выкатил первый в истории 4-битный процессор прямо в блокчейне. Логика на смартконтрактах: один токен = один транзистор, из них собирается полноценная архитектура – около 2300 логических элементов, отсылка к легендарному Intel 4004. Мем-история начала набирать обороты после того, как в твиттер к разработчику пришел сам CZ. ⚙️ BEHEMOTH Расписали по тому…
custom 54496835944254102314
🐂 Получили до +300% на мультфильме с бюджетом двух тарелок риса (настолько плохо, что уже хорошо) Делимся с вами результатами плодотворных выходных в Incrypted+! В начале августа в Китае в прокат вышел анимационный фильм «Бык пришел» — без промо, с анимацией уровня домашнего рендера за три дня, фактически сделанный двумя людьми: режиссером и его мамой. За первые 10 дней фильм собрал около 7000 юаней (~$1000). А по…
custom 54496835944254102314
🔝 Лучшие коллы за неделю. @MEMEcrypted_Chat (10 - 16 августа): 🥇 GUNICORN @ 73K ➜ 2.7M Δ 37x 🥈 BASECAT @ 618K ➜ 20M Δ 32x 🥉 红尘飞 @ 47K ➜ 893K Δ 19x 4️⃣ NEMU @ 10K ➜ 127K Δ 13x 5️⃣ SHITCOINER @ 2.2K ➜ 31K Δ 12x 6️⃣ FOMO @ 21K ➜ 240K Δ 12x ⁉️ Что делать и с чего начать в мемах? Важный пост-инструкция. Набор в Incrypted+ открыт! 🔥Если хотите стать частью лучших на лучших условиях, бронируйте место по ссылке в пару кл…
custom 54496835944254102311
Исторический аудит Tether | BitMart Новый FTX? | Иск против Трампа | Проблемы с Kalshi https://youtu.be/zWEeEcfZ2Sw https://youtu.be/zWEeEcfZ2Sw https://youtu.be/zWEeEcfZ2Sw В эфире 299-й выпуск еженедельного дайджеста криптоновостей. Сегодня обсудим: - как киберполиция накрыла мошенников; - почему ИИ нашел тысячи уязвимостей в блокчейне первой криптовалюты; - что известно о новом FTX; - иск против президента США …
И опять ловим иксы в @MEMEcrypted_Chat и Incrypted+ в этот раз на $DTC и $GROKCOIN ! Заходишь в субботу в публичный чат (если ты еще не там бегом исправляй!) и забираешь пару иксовых колов за буквально полтора часа. В Incrypted+ иксы еще больше – 10x с колла! Делай так каждый день, и депозит болеть не будет. Apachen — красавчик! Он, кстати, лид по мемам в закрытом сообществе Incrypted+. Кстати, по поводу Incrypte…
custom 54496835944254102315
Снова ловим иксы в MEMEcrypted+ На днях на General Voice в Incrypted+ отдельно прошлись по текущему состоянию мем-рынка, новым нарративам и токенам, за которыми сейчас стоит следить. И буквально спустя сутки часть разборов уже успела отработать! • FOMO - 50x+ Отдельной темой на войсе обсуждали возвращение интереса к OG-токенам и их популяризацию. В качестве одного из примеров показывали $FOMO при капитализации око…
custom 54496835944254102314
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @MEMEcrypted. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 5,674 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@incrypted_airdrops · 47,7448 postsIncrypted Tokensales
@Incrypted_Tokensales · 15,5084 posts[Waiting Room] Incrypted+
@IncryptedPlus_WR · 7,4434 postsIncrypted UA
@incrypted_UA · 7,6863 postsIncrypted
@incrypted · 108,7712 postsКак же заебал Гришко...
@GRISHKO_ZAEBAL · 8661 postNick Havryliak ☸️
@havryliakonair · 1,7741 postApachiCryptoHub
@TheCryptoHubUA · 81 postEC | DROPS
@tradecapitalyou · 1,7881 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@incrypted · 108,771
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MEMEcrypted” (@MEMEcrypted), 19,099 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MEMEcrypted.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.