Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Люк-1337

Channel

Люк-1337

@hatchNo_1337

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,625subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001984982130
TypeChannel
Username@hatchNo_1337
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hatchNo_1337

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,6072,6342,620.57 August 2026 — 2,608 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,607 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,634 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,631 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,622 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,619 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,617 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,612 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,634 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,627 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,624 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,625 subscribers2,6257 August 202614 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 38 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,603–2,638 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 07:362,625+1
10 Sept 2026, 14:382,624-3
5 Sept 2026, 05:162,627-7
1 Sept 2026, 11:242,634+22
29 Aug 2026, 04:082,612-5
26 Aug 2026, 11:432,617-2
23 Aug 2026, 20:082,619-3
20 Aug 2026, 14:252,622-9
17 Aug 2026, 18:182,631-3
14 Aug 2026, 19:052,634+27
8 Aug 2026, 09:372,607-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:322,608first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

452 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54631310683097089409721.5%
custom 51972330059737420516213.7%
😁5812.8%
custom 54564524328191328115712.6%
custom 54587973131640582645612.4%
custom 5465290869923912522449.73%
408.85%
🤝245.31%
custom 5463092121546267216122.65%
custom 546113624927424421320.442%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 452 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC793 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вышел 3х на дексе, всем спасибо. #отдыхаем_дальше

custom 54587973131640582648

Signed Splinter

4 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC527 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Что не день, то gm. Завышаем ожидания через UPbit. #проснисипой

12

Signed Splinter

3 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC858 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

GM Завтра TGE, альфа на месте. Что из этого получится - увидим завтра. Предикт был на 40–50% в плус от аллокации, а там будет видно. #деньки_деньги

custom 519723300597374205110

Signed Splinter

31 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC773 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 546313106830970894028

Signed Splinter

28 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,460 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Шо он, лысый. Помню обсуждения, которые велись в ключе: так там миллионы кошельков, как их брить, у всех смарт-контракты, балансы, активные дни. Так вот, тик-токами можно брить. Хорошо, что не часами от бейза. Было бы обидно, а так.. Ранее всплывала инфа об этом в гитхабе, и вот нам пруф в виде Base Verify Onchain. #вэб_чэтыре

custom 5456452432819132811102

Signed Splinter

27 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC778 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Купили сткр, но не тот, который хотелось бы. По сути, произошло то, что и ожидало большинство, продажа MSTR и покупка с этих резервов привилегированных STRC на коррекциях. #ех_блин

🤝9custom 54587973131640582643

Signed Splinter

27 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC≈1,120 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Gm Пока KAITO под тихий разлок большого кол-ва своих токенов, которые они перенесли ещё около полу года назад, объявили о каком-то партнерстве с Твиттером. Их токен дал хорошее движение, что вполне подходит инвесторам. СТ в иксе гудят, а детали анонса так и не дали, не думаю что там что-то существенное, так как мета кайто была остановлена как раз через то, что она делала из твиттера - помойку. Интереснее выглядит

custom 54630921215462672165custom 54564524328191328113

Signed Splinter

26 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC678 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

17custom 546313106830970894011

Signed Splinter

23 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC927 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#джи_ем

custom 546529086992391252221🤝5custom 545645243281913281121

Signed Splinter

21 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,140 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Этот вопрос возник почти у локального дна по ЕТН, не далеко от текущей цены, но глобальная картина выглядела по другому. Сейчас из козырей есть пробитие ЕТН/BTC, но со временем даже эта наклонная даст возможность сделать откат по цене ЕТН. Пишу этот текст, для того, чтобы обозначить в первую очередь для себя, что зона 1100-1200 была бы привлекательной для покупки. Я не говорю вам о DCA, чтобы рано или поздно точно

custom 519723300597374205113

Signed Splinter

20 Jul 2026, 21:34 UTC≈1,400 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

…апатия заставляет не следить за ценой. Так бы я описал то, что сейчас делает рынок. Все ждали, когда паблики перестанут пушить темки и призывать покупать активы. Но всё это случилось настолько нативно, что уже и человеку, который хотел тишины, не нужна криптовалюта. Да, так уже бывало - и не только с тобой. Уставшие уходили, а потом возвращались, когда новый цикл был уже далеко не первый день. Благодаря прошлому

custom 546529086992391252223custom 54630921215462672167custom 54564524328191328116

Signed Splinter

19 Jul 2026, 22:07 UTC761 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В этот раз так. Возвращаемся в криптовалюту. Легендам жмем лапки. #анкара_песик

custom 519723300597374205120😁7🤝2custom 54631310683097089401

Signed Splinter

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hatchNo_1337. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

a01k.Crypto
@a01k_crypto · 30,875
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
cryptomannn
@cryptomannnisnotacult · 38,480
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
hexdrunker reflections
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,322
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
$PCORN |🍿| on $SOL
@popcornmemesol · 70,487
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Люк-1337” (@hatchNo_1337), 2,625 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hatchNo_1337.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.