Channel
@Incrypted_Tokensales
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,337subscribers
-283 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001286736178 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Incrypted_Tokensales |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Incrypted_Tokensales |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 15,337 | -22 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 15,359 | -20 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 15,379 | -10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 15,389 | -21 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 15,410 | -17 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 15,427 | -22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 15,449 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:33 | 15,454 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 15,463 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 15,468 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 15,479 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 15,478 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 15,481 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 15,487 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 15,484 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 15,491 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 15,494 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 15,504 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 15,508 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 15,517 | first reading |
69 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (26 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 15,213 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Follow the Money: итоги августа 2026 (эксклюзивно для Incrypted+) https://incrypted.com/follow-money-bolee-45-mlrd-v-web3-preimushestvo-korporativnyh-sdelok-i-krupnye-raundy-v-ii/ В августе Web3-рынок привлек около $4,51 млрд инвестиций. Основным драйвером финансирования стали корпоративные сделки, на которые пришлось 82% общего объема средств, тогда как доля венчурных инвестиций сократилась с почти 68% в июле до 1…
Итоги листинга UMIA На DEX-платформах стартовали торги токеном от проекта UMIA, о сейле которого писали в посте, Клиринговая цена аукциона составляла $0,36, а сейчас актив торгуется по $0,65, давая почти 2х для участников IDO. CA в сети Base: 0x56ab53b77f07da3af732150e8aec4783eb5bba7d Tokensales | News | Incrypted+
Лаунчпул Cluster Protocol На бирже Gate анонсировали лаунчпул токена CP от проекта Cluster Protocol — инфраструктурного слоя для автономных AI-воркфлоу, предоставляющего доступ к GPU-вычислениям, датасетам и инференсу более 500 ИИ-моделей в сети Base. Всего выделено 5 000 000 CP, которые будут доступны для фарминга в пулах ETH, BTC и CP. Кампания стартует 7 сентября 2026 года в 15:00 (Киев) и продлится 14 дней, до …
▶️ $250 000 на GTA VI, рекорды Nvidia и проблемы Claude — новый дайджест https://youtu.be/V_CSQuNs8Ig Новый 301-й выпуск еженедельного дайджеста криптоновостей уже на YouTube. В выпуске разбираемся: - как слив GTA VI принес автору $250 000; - кто и зачем предлагает «обнулить» госдолг США; - какие рекорды снова поставила Nvidia; - почему бизнес начинает отказываться от Claude; - как криптоимперия Трампа принесла ин…
Оценка Polymarket поднялась до $21 млрд Рынок предсказаний Polymarket привлекает $1 млрд в новом раунде финансирования, по итогам которого оценка платформы достигла $21 млрд. Лид-инвестором выступил фонд 1789 Capital, который вложит около $300 млн. Еще в середине 2025 года протокол оценивался в $300 млн, после инвестиций от ICE в октябре — в $8 млрд, а к апрелю этого года дорос до $15 млрд. Рост почти в 70 раз всег…
Детали сейла Linera на Sonar Команда L1-блокчейна Linera раскрыла подробности комьюнити-сейла на лаунчпаде Sonar, о котором писали в посте. ICO пройдет при FDV в $160 млн продавая от 2% до 5% саплая. Для участников та же оценка, что и ранних инвесторов, включая a16z crypto и Borderless Capital. При этом комьюнити получает 100% анлок на TGE, тогда как токены фондов и команды заблокированы на 3 года. Когда пройдет T…
▶️ $250 000 на сливе GTA VI | Обнуление госдолга США | Рекорды Nvidia | Бизнес бросает Claude https://youtu.be/V_CSQuNs8Ig В эфире 301-й выпуск еженедельного дайджеста криптоновостей. Сегодня обсудим: - как автор сливов GTA VI заработал $250 000 на собственном мемкоине; - зачем предлагают «обнулить» госдолг США; - какие новые рекорды поставила Nvidia; - почему бизнес начинает отказываться от Claude; - как криптоим…
Как устроена токеномика в крипте? Эмиссия, Вестинг, Разлоки и FDV https://youtu.be/QavoBRnxwaU Большинство теряет деньги не из-за плохого входа, а из-за непонимания токеномики проекта. В новом видео разбираем ключевые метрики, которые определяют судьбу токена: FDV, TGE, вестинги, распределение предложения, инфляцию и давление анлоков. Показываем, как Smart Money оценивают проекты до листинга, почему одни токены г…
Follow the Money: $2 млрд для Strategy, инкубатор YZi Labs и доминирование DeFi https://incrypted.com/follow-the-money-2-mlrd-dlja-strategy-ynkubator-yzi-labs-y-domynyrovanye-defi/ В период с 22 по 29 августа 2026 года редакция Incrypted зафиксировала 31 инвестиционную сделку. Среди них есть как традиционные венчурные раунды, так и слияния, а также корпоративные размещения. Подробности известны по 28 из них, в част…
Календарь предстоящих сейлов По сравнению с прошлой неделей, когда вышел FOLD, показав иксовый результат, на этой неделе HEEBOO показал обратное — на листинге даже не было возможности выйти в безубыток. Также на этой неделе завершились сборы Multipli, которые собрали $1 млн. Актуальные кампании следующей недели — на инфографике. Больше деталей и все ссылки в нашем обновленном разделе Incrypted Tokensales. Добавляй…
Новое ICO на Sonar Протокол ончейн-репутации Ethos, который разрабатывает инфраструктуру Proof of Credibility для безопасного взаимодействия в Web3, анонсировал публичный сейл. ICO пройдет на платформе Sonar в формате английского аукциона. Ключевая особенность токенсейла — 85% гарантия возврата средств на 12 месяцев для пользователей, которые будут использовать токены для поручительства в сети. Детали: - тикер: WH…
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @Incrypted_Tokensales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Incrypted Tokensales” (@Incrypted_Tokensales), 15,337 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Incrypted_Tokensales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.