Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ready to Fight | Official Channel

Channel

Ready to Fight | Official Channel

@rtfight_com

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

86,150subscribers

-1,939 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001374308052
TypeChannel
Username@rtfight_com
DescriptionBoxing office in your pocket Founded by Oleksandr Usyk @Usyk17 & Sergey Lapin 📲 rtf.social
Created3 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rtfight_com

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

86,15088,08987,119.56 August 2026 — 88,089 subscribers7 August 2026 — 87,981 subscribers8 August 2026 — 87,842 subscribers9 August 2026 — 87,716 subscribers10 August 2026 — 87,586 subscribers11 August 2026 — 87,403 subscribers12 August 2026 — 87,270 subscribers13 August 2026 — 87,146 subscribers15 August 2026 — 87,032 subscribers16 August 2026 — 86,811 subscribers17 August 2026 — 86,700 subscribers18 August 2026 — 86,575 subscribers20 August 2026 — 86,444 subscribers20 August 2026 — 86,350 subscribers22 August 2026 — 86,150 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1,939. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85,859–88,380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 09:2586,150-200
20 Aug 2026, 23:0486,350-94
20 Aug 2026, 00:3586,444-131
18 Aug 2026, 21:4786,575-125
17 Aug 2026, 19:3786,700-111
16 Aug 2026, 18:5686,811-221
15 Aug 2026, 04:5387,032-114
13 Aug 2026, 23:2887,146-124
12 Aug 2026, 15:2487,270-133
11 Aug 2026, 14:4287,403-183
10 Aug 2026, 14:1287,586-130
9 Aug 2026, 12:3387,716-126
8 Aug 2026, 09:3287,842-139
7 Aug 2026, 10:1187,981-108
6 Aug 2026, 15:4788,089first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.324%
avg views ÷ 86,150 subscribers
Avg views / post
279
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held19 (3 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total5,308
Reactions total96
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,800
Videos
1,440
Links
2,810

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6466.7%
🔥1515.6%
👍66.25%
👏44.17%
💯33.13%
😁22.08%
👌11.04%
😎11.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC176 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

ON THIS DAY: USYK vs. JOSHUA II 🥊 August 20, 2022. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A tactical masterclass that cemented Oleksandr Usyk’s status as the king of the heavyweight division. In a highly anticipated rematch, Usyk defended his WBA, IBF, WBO, and IBO titles via split decision. В ЦЕЙ ДЕНЬ: УСИК - ДЖОШУА II 🥊 20 серпня 2022 року. Джидда, Саудівська Аравія. Тактичний майстер-клас, який закріпив за Олександром Усиком ст

4👏2

18 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC238 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

FOOTWORK MASTERS: THE TOP LIST 🔥 Great footwork isn’t just about fitness — it’s about geometry, anticipation, and the ability to find "invisible" angles. Most guys just fight; these five changed the coordinates of the ring. Swipe to see our top 5 👉 МАЙСТРИ РОБОТИ НІГ: ТОП-СПИСОК 🔥 Крута робота ніг — це не про "фізуху", це про геометрію, передчуття та вміння знаходити «невидимі» кути атаки. Більшість просто б'єтьс

2💯1

15 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC338 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

THE GREATEST VICTORIES: LENNOX LEWIS 🥊👑 "The Lion" ruled the heavyweight division with an iron fist. From his breakout win over Ruddock to the historic nights against Holyfield and Klitschko, Lennox Lewis fought the best and beat the best. Swipe through to see our Top 5 victories of his legendary career. НАЙВЕЛИЧНІШІ ПЕРЕМОГИ: ЛЕННОКС ЛЬЮЇС 🥊👑 «Лев» правив важкою вагою «залізною рукою». Від проривної перемоги над

3

14 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC296 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Every superstar on this list started with a dream and a pair of gloves. Swipe through to see how these legends evolved from amateur prospects to professional icons. _____________________ Кожна суперзірка у цьому списку починала з мрії та пари рукавичок. Гортайте, щоб побачити еволюцію цих ікон: від перших кроків в аматорах до професійної слави.

5

14 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC274 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

THE ALL-TIME MOST INTIMIDATING BOXERS 💣 Their aura, their gaze, and their brutal finishing power made them the most feared men to ever step into the ring. НАЙГРІЗНІШІ БОКСЕРИ В ІСТОРІЇ 💣 Їхня аура, їхній погляд і жорстока сила зробили їх найбільш лякаючими постатями в історії боксу.

6

13 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC237 viewsread 19 August 2026
Poll

Cast your vote! 🥊

  1. Terence Crawford35%
  2. Sugar Ray Leonard0%
  3. Oscar De La Hoya4%
  4. Manny Pacquiao31%
  5. Thomas Hearns4%
  6. Floyd Mayweather Jr.31%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC234 views1 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

THE MULTI-DIVISION CLUB 👑🥊 Conquering one world title is a feat. Conquering five, six, or eight is the stuff of legends. These fighters didn't stay in their comfort zone — they challenged themselves time and time again. Which of these legends had the most impressive climb through the divisions? 👇 КЛУБ БАГАТОРАЗОВИХ ЧЕМПІОНІВ 👑🥊 Завоювати один титул — це досягнення. Підкорити п'ять, шість або вісім — це рівень лег

1

12 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC258 views4 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

ON THIS DAY: AJ vs. HELENIUS 🥊💥 August 12, 2023. Robert Helenius took the fight on a week's notice after Dillian Whyte's failed test. Joshua stayed composed, dissected his opponent, and closed the show with a massive right hand at 1:27 of the 7th round. ЦЕЙ ДЕНЬ: ДЖОШУА — ХЕЛЕНІУС 🥊💥 12 серпня 2023 року. Роберт Хеленіус погодився на бій за тиждень до виходу в ринг після того, як тест Ділліана Вайта виявився позити

4

11 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC253 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

THE KINGS OF HAND SPEED ⚡️ Precision, rhythm, and lightning-fast combinations. Here are 5 fighters who turned hand speed into a deadly weapon. КОРОЛІ ШВИДКОСТІ РУК ⚡️ Точність, ритм та блискавичні комбінації. Ось 5 бійців, які перетворили швидкість рук на смертоносну зброю.

🔥42👏1

10 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC273 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

We’ve put together some of the most powerful mindset quotes from Oleksandr Usyk. These words are pure fuel for those who are chasing their own dreams. ______ Ми зібрали найпотужніші мотиваційні цитати Олександра Усика. Ці слова — справжнє паливо для тих, хто йде до власної мети.

6😁2🔥1😎1

10 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC271 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

THE LONGEST UNBEATEN STREAKS IN BOXING HISTORY 🥊 Consistency is the ultimate weapon. These fighters proved that perfection isn't a fluke — it’s a career-long commitment. НАЙДОВШІ НЕПЕРЕМОЖНІ СЕРІЇ В ІСТОРІЇ БОКСУ 🥊 Стабільність — це найсильніша зброя. Ці бійці довели, що досконалість — це не випадковість, а результат роботи протягом усієї кар'єри.

🔥32👍1

7 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC370 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

AFTER THE DISQUALIFICATION: ROY’S REVENGE ⏳ August 7, 1997. After a controversial disqualification in their first meeting, Roy Jones Jr. came out on a mission. He didn't just win — he erased any doubt, knocking out Montell Griffin in the 1st round to reclaim his WBC Light Heavyweight title. ПІСЛЯ ДИСКВАЛІФІКАЦІЇ: РЕВАНШ РОЯ ⏳ 7 серпня 1997 року. Після суперечливої дискваліфікації у їхній першій зустрічі, Рой Джонс

3👍2🔥2👌1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rtfight_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

Cast your vote! 🥊

  1. Terence Crawford35%
  2. Sugar Ray Leonard0%
  3. Oscar De La Hoya4%
  4. Manny Pacquiao31%
  5. Thomas Hearns4%
  6. Floyd Mayweather Jr.31%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Cast your vote! 🥊

  1. Len Wickwar24%
  2. Billy Bird18%
  3. Archie Moore41%
  4. Wilfredo Gómez12%
  5. Carlos Zárate29%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 233,593 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ready to Fight | Official Channel” (@rtfight_com), 86,150 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rtfight_com.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.