🪙 Два тайских бизнесмена судятся с Tether из-за заморозки 42 400 000 USDT, которую компания провела по запросу американских силовиков ещё до получения судебного ордера. Теперь суду предстоит решить, может ли эмитент стейблкоина фактически блокировать и переводить чужие активы БЕЗ предварительного решения суда. 🛡 Крипта скам?!

Channel
Крипта скам?!
@cryptascam1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,218subscribers
-296 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002228846758 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptascam1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptascam1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 11,218 | -20 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 11,238 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:43 | 11,253 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:27 | 11,270 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 11,278 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 11,287 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 11,302 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 11,316 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 11,332 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:49 | 11,343 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 11,352 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 11,363 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 11,371 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 11,382 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 11,392 | -9 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 11,401 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 11,414 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 11,428 | -21 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 11,449 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 11,461 | first reading |
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.1%
- avg views ÷ 11,218 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,040
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (7 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 76,000 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 10s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
☠️ Из Injective вывели около $4 900 000, использовав ошибку в бинарных опционах и страховых фондах — для запуска атаки хватило 9100 USDT. Во время инцидента сеть не выпускала блоки почти 4 часа, а команда проекта пока не раскрыла детали. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
🏳️ Дуров сообщил, что Gram Wallet уже готов и доступен части пользователей Telegram, а в ближайшие недели его постепенно раскатят на аудиторию более чем в миллиард человек. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
☠️ Cronos остановили блокчейн после атаки на крупнейший кредитный протокол Tectonic — предварительный ущерб оценивают примерно в $75 000 000. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
🇻🇳 Во Вьетнаме готовят запуск легального рынка криптовалют — пять компаний уже прошли первый этап отбора для получения лицензий на криптобиржи. После выдачи первой лицензии у инвесторов будет ещё шесть месяцев, прежде чем торговлю разрешат только через местные регулируемые площадки. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
⚽️ Circle, эмитент USDC, стал главным спонсором футбольного клуба Chelsea. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
🕵️♂️ DEX-сервис Moonwell подвергся взлому, в результате которого злоумышленники вывели около $8 700 000. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
🇪🇺 Revolut выходит на рынок стейблкоинов и готовит собственный токен, привязанный к евро. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
😷 Завышенная оценка проектов — болячка не только крипты На polymarket уже летят ставки, что IPO Anthropic выйдет с оценкой выше, чем у SpaceX, после питча компании инвесторам, где прозвучало, что её потенциальная выручка за год может превысить $30 трлн. Общий ВВП США за год: $32 трлн. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
🌬 Bitdeer будет добывать биткоин с помощью ветра Компания развернет 28 МВт майнинговых мощностей рядом с техасским ветропарком Las Majadas. Ожидаемый прирост хешрейта составит почти 2 EH/s. Запуск начнется в сентябре. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
🤡 Кто-то «подарил» мошенникам $2m, скопировав адрес из истории транзакций. Жертва попалась на схему address poisoning («отравление адреса») – злоумышленник заранее отправил микротранзакцию на 0,0002 USDC с похожего адреса, чтобы подменить нужный. Пострадавший кошелек, вероятно, принадлежит компании Bofur Capital. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
🇬🇪 В Грузии активно спорят о криптофермах — по оценкам критиков отрасли, майнинг потребляет около 6% всей электроэнергии страны — примерно 1 млрд кВт·ч в год, сопоставимо с потреблением Батуми. При этом фермы работают круглосуточно, а их вклад в бюджет считают несоразмерно маленьким на фоне нагрузки на энергосистему. 🛡 Крипта скам?!
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @cryptascam1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@LentaBis · 73,817
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипта скам?!” (@cryptascam1), 11,218 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptascam1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.