Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “ОГо! 🐈” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
408,000 average views per post against 660,749 subscribers — an engagement rate of 61.7%. Across the 1,192 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,288–998,609 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.72% and 11.7%, with a median of 4.36%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (21 July 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Posts measured
14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
5,706,000
Mature posts only
61.7% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 20 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 16 days, net -4,710. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 659,750–665,873 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 19:55
660,456
-293
20 Aug 2026, 15:55
660,749
-319
19 Aug 2026, 15:03
661,068
-261
18 Aug 2026, 17:47
661,329
-438
17 Aug 2026, 14:24
661,767
-395
16 Aug 2026, 03:53
662,162
-366
14 Aug 2026, 15:07
662,528
-524
13 Aug 2026, 04:04
663,052
-249
12 Aug 2026, 00:42
663,301
-405
10 Aug 2026, 21:21
663,706
-421
10 Aug 2026, 00:41
664,127
-220
9 Aug 2026, 00:53
664,347
-294
7 Aug 2026, 21:22
664,641
-286
7 Aug 2026, 00:05
664,927
-239
6 Aug 2026, 00:53
665,166
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
53.6%
avg views ÷ 660,456 subscribers
Avg views / post
354,000
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
26 (15 July 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
6,017,200
Reactions total
94,707
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
812
Videos
195
Links
506
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
302,555 reactions across 25 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
170,932
56.5%
😁
77,381
25.6%
🔥
33,180
11.0%
👍
20,005
6.61%
🤬
1,057
0.349%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 314,707reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У травні, за три дні акції на Apple, ви зробили 47 тис. покупок на 1,42 млрд.грн
У мене парі з Михайлом Рогальським. Я поставив на те, що цього разу ви зробите ще більше😉
Зараз уже 300 мільйонів!!!
Памʼятаю, ви просили знову зробити акцію на айфони та макбуки. Так от, ми зробили - на Маркеті з 22 по 24 серпня вся техніка Apple — до 20 платежів!
А якщо у вас після покупки лишиться старий девайс, який не знаєте, де притулити, - раджу продати на Базарі.
Він якраз для таких випадків, коли річ комусь не потрібна, а хтось саме про таку і мріє
І я знову оберу у Threads 10 покупок, які повністю оплачу. А поки ви це д…
У mono стало стільки скінів для карток від відомих блогерів, що люди почали робити з них цілі каталоги😅
Ми зібрали всі актуальні скіни в одному місці тут — понад 100 штук! Можете відшукати улюбленого блогера і офоромити підписку на його monoбазу
І це не тільки про блогерів: є багато скінів — від фондів та організацій, що збирають на добрі справи
На monoбазарі накопичилося кілька цікавих нововведень
Головне - з 15 серпня до 15 вересня зробили доставку безкоштовною взагалі на все. Ціна не має значення - можете купити щось за 100 гривень, а можете за 100 000. І все це ще й можна взяти трьома частинами, якщо вистачає ліміту
А ще тепер там можна продавати як ФОП. Думаю, що багатьом підприємцям це дасть додаткову можливість заробити
Ну і раз скоро перше вересня…
Запускаємо самовивіз! Тепер замовлення з Маркету можна самостійно забирати з магазинів Алло і Фокстрот по всій Україні
Система проста - замовляєте що хочете, вибираєте зручний магазин, і десь за годину вже можна там усе отримати. Корисно, особливо в такий час, як зараз
Тестуйте і залишайте відгуки
✅️ НБУ впроваджує великий пакет пом'якшення валютних обмежень із основним фокусом на підтримці населення.
Пакет також містить важливі зміни для юридичних осіб та фінансового сектору.
Зміни для фізичних осіб:
1️⃣ суттєво збільшуються ліміти на купівлю безготівкової іноземної валюти та розширюється перелік операцій, доступних у межах цього ліміту;
3️⃣ подвоюється ліміт на зняття готівкових коштів із валютних раху…
Сьогодні у нас 500 000 ФОПів!!!
Знаєте що зазвичай відбувається, коли відкриваєте ФОП? Вам одразу починають надзвонювати банки. Безліч пропозицій, «унікальних» умов та іншого «лишевнаса»
А ми ще зі старту вирішили не дзвонити і не набридати. Виходить, 500 тисяч підприємців обрали mono без жодного дзвінка!!!
Приємно❤️
Дякуємо за довіру!!!
Працюємо далі!
❤12,900🔥2,200👍1,080
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @OGoMono. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 4,354 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
FEDOROV @zedigital · 247,145 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Останній Капіталіст ✙ @OstanniyCapitalist · 118,873 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Сергій Притула @serhiyprytula · 118,160 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
BRAMA @brama_channel · 111,996 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Дія @diia_gov · 130,110 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Головне управління розвідки МО України @DIUkraine · 226,122 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Канал Ростіка @crypto_rostik · 118,539 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Бро скинув мем @bromeeems · 317,606 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Укрзалізниця @UkrzalInfo · 235,883 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Лебидло @lebigaa · 426,667 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
✙DeepState✙🇺🇦 @deepstateua · 765,118 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Валерій Залужний @Zaluzhnui · 225,685 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Батальйон «Монако» | Україна | Новини @batalionmonako · 714,177 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Львівобленерго💡Новини @lvivoblenergo · 179,008 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
МАДЯР🇺🇦 @robert_magyar · 600,048 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
IT ARMY of Ukraine @itarmyofukraine2022 · 106,630 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
PVP.POLTAVA @poltava_pvp · 108,082 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
1-й корпус НГУ «Азов» @azov_media · 240,766 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Сергій FLASH | Про технології @serhii_flash · 166,258 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Український Наступ | #УкрТг ∆ @ukrnastup · 129,599 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
єСвітло💡Київ | Світло @esvitlo_kyiv_ua · 155,334 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Служба безпеки України @SBUkr · 299,130 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Прикарпаттяобленерго @prykarpattyaoblenergo_official · 112,388 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Киевский Движ @k_dvizh · 461,293 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 209 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Monobank (Ukraine)(en.wikipedia.org) “…join ''monobank''.
On October 11,{{Cite web |title=ОГо! |url=https://t.me/OGoMono/295 |access-date=2025-05-13 |website=Telegram}} ''monobank''…” read 16 August 2026
Monobank(uk.wikipedia.org) “…приєднатися до monobank.
11 жовтня monobank{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/OGoMono/295 |title=ОГо! |website=Telegram |access-date=2025-05-05}}…” read 16 August 2026
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОГо!” (@OGoMono), 660,456 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OGoMono.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
