Офіційний канал головного редактора Цензор.Нет Юрія Бутусова
YouTube: youtube.com/c/БутусовПлюс
Стати спонсором:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg7T647ROSeONOCHeNMBduQ/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/UButusov
Надіслати контент:
@feedbackbutusov_bot
Created
25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net +573. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 347,286–348,188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 19:48
348,084
+5
20 Aug 2026, 13:42
348,079
+116
19 Aug 2026, 16:35
347,963
-25
18 Aug 2026, 15:34
347,988
+18
17 Aug 2026, 16:28
347,970
+33
16 Aug 2026, 13:58
347,937
-24
14 Aug 2026, 21:33
347,961
+8
13 Aug 2026, 11:23
347,953
+307
12 Aug 2026, 09:11
347,646
+101
11 Aug 2026, 12:12
347,545
+34
10 Aug 2026, 09:52
347,511
+9
9 Aug 2026, 08:41
347,502
+50
8 Aug 2026, 10:38
347,452
+62
7 Aug 2026, 10:03
347,390
-65
6 Aug 2026, 10:30
347,455
-56
6 Aug 2026, 00:53
347,511
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:06
347,511
first reading
Engagement
260 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 348,084 subscribers
Avg views / post
52,400
260 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
260
of 260 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
260 (5 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
13,611,750
Reactions total
562,326
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,300
Videos
≈20,000
Links
≈9,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 23m
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 177 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
534,808 reactions across 249 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
139,045
26.0%
👍
75,669
14.1%
🤣
68,308
12.8%
😁
65,657
12.3%
❤
52,153
9.75%
😡
21,596
4.04%
💯
19,407
3.63%
💊
17,075
3.19%
🙏
14,127
2.64%
🍾
12,922
2.42%
👏
7,825
1.46%
🎉
6,383
1.19%
😢
5,766
1.08%
🤪
4,324
0.809%
🤔
3,522
0.659%
🫡
3,216
0.601%
💔
3,171
0.593%
😭
2,325
0.435%
👌
1,425
0.266%
🤷♂
966
0.181%
40 further kinds
9,926
1.86%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 260 of the 260 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 562,326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 260 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
199
across the posts below
Posts paid on
56
of 260 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ButusovPlus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 260 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
"Старшина еще догорает, достать его пока невозможно"
А вот и полное видео от противника. Цитата:
«Ждун-дрон возле дороги ударил по «буханке». В результате атаки всё сгорело, части тел разбросаны вокруг машины. К сожалению, спасти никого не удалось - группа, которая приехала на помощь, прибыла слишком поздно».
“Как дальше жить? Никто об этом не хочет даже и думать, и говорить. Ни наше правительство, и никто”
Оккупированный Мелитополь, Запорожская область. Электричества нет вообще.
Жизнь при России.
Очередной 18-летний юноша, отправленный Путиным на смерть в Украине.
Никита Василейко, 2008 года рождения, выпустился из гимназии под названием "Шанс", где теперь будет и его "парта героя".
Фаршеризация российского штурмовика в месиво после попадания украинского FPV-дрона. Харьковское направление фронта, кадры подразделения беспилотных систем «Стрикс».
Видео - https://t.me/strix_kh_ua
▶️⏸️⏯️⏹️ Дрони завдали удару по логістичному хабу маркетплейсу Ozon у місті Чапаєвськ Самарської області РФ
@censor_net І Ми у Facebook, Instagram, X, Tik-Tok, YouTube
Тема номер один в эфире российских федеральных новостей - удар тварей по супермаркету в Кривом Роге.
Гордость переполняет скотов из РФ - убиты 15 человек, ранены 130 человек, из них 23 — дети.
"400 километров проехали до границы с Беларусью за бензином, а мне говорят: пошел нах*й отсюда, п*здуй откуда приехал!"
Хроники превращения страны-бензоколонки в страну-автостоянку: регулярная рубрика.
"Пару шагов дальше – и плакаты с призывами подписать контракт на СВО. Возьми деньги и стань Одиссеем, который не вернулся домой"
Российский оккупант Даниил Туленков, бывший зек, который воевал в Украине в составе формирования «Шторм Z», сходил на премьеру «Одиссеи» и увидел особые смыслы для российского зрителя.
Отличная рецензия, надо смотреть!
Втыкать российский триколор куда попало очень опасно для здоровья. Этой двойке оккупантов сильно повезло, оказались в плену у разведчиков 2-й роты «OnlyWars» 3-го ОРБ.
Источник
«Я не знаю, сколько мой ребенок получит, честно. Я уже об этом думала: если он погибнет, интересно, сколько я получу за своего ребенка?»
Ирина из Астрахани - бывшая жена пока ещё живого «освободителя» - поведала о российской версии «Голодных игр», где каждый уже думает о своем выигрыше.
Муж пытается выжить, платит командиру дивизиона за возможность не отправляться на штурм, будущая супруга спешит оформить брак ради…
🤣1,250💊437😁84❤33👍26🙉23👀9☃5
Showing the 12 most recent of 260 posts we hold for @ButusovPlus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,440 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Портников @portnikov · 69,006 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Ukraine context @ukraine_context · 92,319 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
💥BEREZOVIEW (Taras Berezovets) WAR IN UKRAINE @berezoview · 140,845 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Березовый сок @BerezaJuice · 143,636 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
К-2 @k_2army · 160,479 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
Цензор.НЕТ | Новини України та світу, війна та аналітика @censor_net · 183,257 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Денис Казанський @kazansky2017 · 149,563 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Сергій FLASH | Про технології @serhii_flash · 166,258 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
WarLife 18+ Украина Россия Война 18+ @Voyna18 · 198,383 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
TERRA Розвідка Інфо @terraops · 104,583 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS @Tsaplienko · 322,676 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Zvиздец Мангусту @zvizdecmanhustu · 68,763 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
KARYMAT @karymat · 70,596 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Александр Коваленко @zloyodessit · 81,211 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
ЦИМБАЛЮК @RomaTsymbaliuk · 62,159 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Om TV @OmTVchannel · 77,458 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
YIGAL LEVIN @yigal_levin · 220,448 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
PEKHNO🇺🇦 @pekhno_news · 68,814 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
ПЕТРУШЕВСЬКИЙ @petrushevskyi · 71,578 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Sazonov / Official @Kirilovolodimirovich · 106,800 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Русский Добровольческий Корпус @rvc_army · 114,499 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
✙ Груз 200 ✙ ∆ @gruz_200_rus · 164,277 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Arestovich / Official @O_Arestovich_official · 245,531 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Легион «Свобода России» @legionoffreedom · 135,703 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 231 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
14 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
4 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Kereken(de.wikipedia.org) “…Überfalls auf die Ukraine]] im September 2024{{Internetquelle |url=https://t.me/ButusovPlus/15704 |titel=БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС |abruf=2024-12-10}}, diese Nachricht…” read 16 August 2026
Andrey Gurulyov(en.wikipedia.org) “…sewage, nothing at all".{{Cite web |title=БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС |url=https://t.me/ButusovPlus/30184 |access-date=2026-06-10 |website=Telegram}}
===…” read 16 August 2026
Oleh Sentsov(en.wikipedia.org) “…during offensive operations.{{Cite web |title=БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС |url=https://t.me/ButusovPlus/3666 |access-date=2023-07-13 |website=Telegram}}{{Cite…” read 16 August 2026
Соледар(uk.wikipedia.org) “…зараз саме з цього міста, на Донбасі мороз, сонячний день...|url=https://t.me/ButusovPlus/1990|website=Telegram|accessdate=2023-01-07|last=Бутусов|fir…” read 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС” (@ButusovPlus), 348,084 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ButusovPlus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.