National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -483. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91,733–92,994 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 00:01
91,878
-61
16 Sept 2026, 18:39
91,939
-46
14 Sept 2026, 19:16
91,985
-43
13 Sept 2026, 07:58
92,028
-73
11 Sept 2026, 10:17
92,101
-57
8 Sept 2026, 16:01
92,158
-90
5 Sept 2026, 07:16
92,248
-46
3 Sept 2026, 09:32
92,294
-12
2 Sept 2026, 06:13
92,306
-116
1 Sept 2026, 04:02
92,422
-2
31 Aug 2026, 05:06
92,424
+1
30 Aug 2026, 07:04
92,423
-18
29 Aug 2026, 06:46
92,441
-48
28 Aug 2026, 06:14
92,489
-4
27 Aug 2026, 06:43
92,493
-26
26 Aug 2026, 04:42
92,519
-41
25 Aug 2026, 05:33
92,560
-147
24 Aug 2026, 05:27
92,707
+51
22 Aug 2026, 13:24
92,656
-51
21 Aug 2026, 06:24
92,707
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.0%
avg views ÷ 91,878 subscribers
Avg views / post
31,200
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
26 (22 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
281,100
Reactions total
11,841
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 22:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,300
Videos
≈3,480
Links
≈9,490
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 24s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27,238 reactions across 23 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
13,561
49.8%
❤
7,331
26.9%
🫡
4,789
17.6%
✍
1,557
5.72%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,771 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
161
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 25 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @usinfantryman1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Рубець після поранення можна прибрати!
У цьому допоможуть “Неопалимі” – проєкт, що безкоштовно лікує постраждалих внаслідок війни з опіками, рубцями або деформаційними ушкодженнями шкіри
Хто може отримати допомогу?
🔹військові;
🔹ветерани;
🔹звільненні з полону;
🔹постраждалі внаслідок війни цивільні й діти.
Де можна отримати допомогу?
“Неопалимі” вже є у 17 регіонах країни, а до лікування пацієнтів залученні 32 кліні…
Що краще: бронежилет чи плитоноска?
Відповідь у відео ⬇️
https://youtu.be/ykClZucn0Wg?is=IPlqXySh2nhjiJ0a
Коли заходить мова про вибір індивідуального бронезахисту, перше, що необхідно зрозуміти: універсального рішення не існує. Бронежилет або плитоноску потрібно обирати не тому, що конкретна модель модна, дорога чи популярна, а виходячи з ваших задач, комплекції та реальних загроз, з якими ви стикаєтесь.
Бронежи…
How it's started vs how it's going.
А понтів було, а гонору, а яке страшне їбало корчив на фото, "закожнимприйдун" кончений.
А потім різко пук-сєрєньк...
А що ж сталося?
Нереально крута інституція, може одразу і дивіз з "AEQUITAS, LEX, DEFENSIO" на "Єб@ть так королєву, воровать так мілліон" варто змінити? Прям давно проситься.
Який треш та сюрр, яке ж позорисько...
Американський піхотинець
7 вересня - День Воєнної Розвідки України.
Розвідник - це той, хто завжди крокує попереду, хто бере на себе ризик та відповідальність, хто "працює" там, де інші не зможуть. Хто на знаннях та тренуваннях, на досвіді та характері, на глибокому розумінні та відчайдушний сміливості робить неможливе.
Це люди, чиї вчинки часто-густо залишаються непоміченими, а подвиги - нерозказаними. Їх сила не у славі, а у вірності спр…
https://youtu.be/FnkDjyU4yKM?is=VD9CAyo7uwWDbaZ8
Наполегливо рекомендую подивитись відео Андрія, щоб розуміти як і з чим доводиться стикатися. Це важливо. Дійсно важливо.
Дякую.
Американський піхотинець
Пані та панове, якщо у вас десь лежать без діла сталеві бронеплити (типу тих, що були в "корсарах", шляк би їх трафив) то ви можете їх нам переслати. Вони на додатковий захист деякого транспорту підуть, тобто попрацюють ще за призначенням.
P.S. навіть підарські згодяться.
Американський піхотинець
Я від щирого серця вітаю всіх вільних людей з Днем Незалежності України.
Я щиро вдячний Вам всім за підтримку, допомогу, довіру та щоденну працю на користь України та нашої перемоги.
Хто б Ви не були, де б Ви не були, якщо Ви допомагаєте Україні у боротьбі і наближаєте перемогу над одвічним ворогом - це і Ваше свято також, бо перемога кується не тільки на полі бою.
Маски давно скинуто, кожна і притомна людина в св…
Друзі, збираю будь-яку інформацію про камери на «Шахедах». Про цілі зразки навіть не мрію, надішліть хоча б фотографії.
Контакти
https://t.me/serhii_flash_contact_bot
https://forflash.com.ua
Попрошу про відносно невелику допомогу на ті витрати, які б мало повністю закривати держава. Але, там видно зайняті іншими, більш важливими речами, тому і доводиться якось вирішувати питання кабелів, антен, подовжувачів, поточного мілкого ремонту генераторів, різних дрібниць від елементної бази до масел та палива...
На поточні витрати підрозділу
Це не те щоб горіло та було прям терміновим, але ці дрібниці - ніфіга …
Втрати у підарів дійсно величезні, більш того, як свідчать деякі компетентні джерела вони поступово наближаються до такої собі "критичної" межі.
Все більше незалежних джерел та розвідданих, припускають, що після виборів хуйло може оголосити нову хвилю мобілізації.
На самій рашці про це говорять дедалі голосніше. Одні виють, що мобілізація неминуча й навіть запізніла, інші намагаються виставити ці розмови брехнею. А…
🔥1,120✍281❤203🫡108
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @usinfantryman1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
😇Андрій ✙ ГАВ😈 @gavlife · 28,994 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
Lobby X ARMY @lobbyxArmy · 26,926 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
PSDinfo 🇺🇦 @PSDinfo · 54,430 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
VD:Розвідка Ворога @VictoryDrones · 38,507 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
Сергій FLASH | Про технології @serhii_flash · 167,479 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Анатолій Штефан "Штірліц" @a_shtirlitz · 138,200 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Victory Drones @VictoryDrones2023 · 23,336 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 September 2026
Сили безпілотних систем ЗС України @usf_army · 33,966 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
Roman Donik @romandonik · 21,733 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
Alpha Centauri | Космос @alphacentaurichannel · 34,853 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
РЕЙД Info ✙ @ukropernews · 44,870 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Євген Карась ✙ @karas_evgen · 163,920 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
✙ ATF•Anti Terror Force @atfcrew · 21,774 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 22 September 2026
3-тя окрема штурмова бригада @ab3brigade · 44,426 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Третя Сила @The3rdForceUA · 57,053 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
donetchanyn @donetchan · 24,168 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
Повернись живим @savelifeua · 24,692 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
Розвідка Ноєм @rozvidka_noem · 112,353 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Будем всех бамбить! @budem_bambit · 22,171 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Хроники Ридика 🫡 @hroniki_radika · 24,343 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
КІБЕРБЕЗ @cybersecurity_ua · 53,248 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Євген Вольнов aka майор Чорнобаєв @prankota_ch · 86,455 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Bochkala_WAR @bochkala_war · 40,148 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
Піхотинець Хижак🦅🇺🇦 @lost_generation_88 · 64,237 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 156 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Американський 🚀 піхотинець” (@usinfantryman1), 91,878 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usinfantryman1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.