🔍 OS1NT, новини та аналітика.
Око Гора – коротко (не завжди) про головне.
Мій канал про фронт та все, що навколо нього - @karta2402.
Twitter (Х) - https://x.com/oko_gora_tg
Зв'язок/реклама: @okogora1_bot
Підтримати автора: https://bmc.link/okogora
Created
28 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,096. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66,530–68,057 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 06:40
67,839
+57
15 Sept 2026, 21:55
67,782
-99
14 Sept 2026, 02:22
67,881
+147
12 Sept 2026, 07:19
67,734
+133
10 Sept 2026, 01:57
67,601
+100
6 Sept 2026, 18:00
67,501
+104
4 Sept 2026, 08:16
67,397
+81
2 Sept 2026, 18:03
67,316
-16
1 Sept 2026, 18:09
67,332
-106
31 Aug 2026, 17:38
67,438
+5
30 Aug 2026, 18:58
67,433
+24
29 Aug 2026, 15:49
67,409
+38
28 Aug 2026, 14:47
67,371
+58
27 Aug 2026, 18:09
67,313
+112
26 Aug 2026, 17:16
67,201
+62
25 Aug 2026, 16:33
67,139
+6
24 Aug 2026, 19:45
67,133
+79
23 Aug 2026, 07:07
67,054
+30
21 Aug 2026, 20:17
67,024
+77
20 Aug 2026, 15:02
66,947
first reading
Engagement
308 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.6%
avg views ÷ 67,839 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,900
187 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
189
of 308 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
308 (4 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
4,647,800
Reactions total
178,133
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,600
Videos
≈2,670
Links
≈3,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
24m 24s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
289,689 reactions across 294 posts, in 63 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
87,063
30.1%
🔥
80,828
27.9%
🤬
38,400
13.3%
👍
21,198
7.32%
😁
13,732
4.74%
🤔
10,575
3.65%
🙏
8,148
2.81%
🤣
6,519
2.25%
😢
4,043
1.40%
💯
1,721
0.594%
😡
1,654
0.571%
👏
1,511
0.522%
🎉
1,210
0.418%
🤩
1,048
0.362%
🥱
985
0.34%
🍌
897
0.31%
👀
882
0.304%
🫡
779
0.269%
🗿
760
0.262%
🍾
701
0.242%
43 further kinds
7,035
2.43%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 306 of the 308 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300,287 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 308 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
191
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 306 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
125
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oko_gora. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 308 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.325%
1 of 308 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
19,600
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
22,700
over 305 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 308 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
✍️ Уважаемые подписчики!
Око Гора не финансируется ОП или Госдепом США (пока). Главный инвестор канала – вы :)
Каждый день стараюсь делать интересные карты, инфографики и аналитику, на что уходит просто гигантское количество времени, чтобы вам было проще отслеживать ход войны. Если вам нравится то, что я делаю, можете поддержать меня донатом.
Также, задавайте вопросы в комментариях к донату, я с радостью дам вам н…
🚬 За что ни возьмусь считать, через пару месяцев информацию урезают до минимума.
В последнее время пан Мадяр публикует в основном нарезки с поражением подстанций и газораспределительной инфраструктуры, не показывая удары по ПВО, РЛС и штабам. Но, насколько мне известно, удары по этим целям продолжаются примерно в тех же темпах, что и ранее.
Стоит уточнить, если в июле делалась ставка на энергетику Крыма, то сейчас,…
😌Карта зафиксированных middle strike ударов БПЛА по оккупированным территориям Украины за август.
Сразу уточню, что тут только видеоподтвержденная работа СБС, СБУ, ССО, ГУР, ВМС. Без учета результатов подразделений сухопутных войск и НГУ.
Всего – 163 зафиксированных атаки, из них:
🟢Подстанции, ТЭЦ - 111;
🟢Морской транспорт/порт – 14;
🟢Газовая инфраструктура - 11;
🟢Нефтебазы/ГСМ – 6;
🟢Штабы/пункты дислокации – 4;
🟢…
🤷♀️ Ночью реактивными БПЛА/Нептуном атакован основной дронопорт "Цимбулово" в Орловской области.
Поражено 2 бункера с БПЛА, 2 предпусковых склада БПЛА, и место запуска "Герань-5".
source.
🤔 Malcontent News:
Последние несколько недель Украина в приоритетных целях начала уничтожать российские РЛС раннего предупреждения и сопровождения целей «Небо-М», которые предназначены для отслеживания баллистических ракет и малозаметной авиации.
Только за последнюю неделю поражено 4 комплекса в прифронтовых областях РФ.
Вероятно, на фоне заявлений украинских компаний о финальных испытаниях баллистических ракет тип…
😌 Карта активности украинских БПЛА и ракет на территории РФ по состоянию на утро 21 сентября.
Российские мониторы писали о фиксации нескольких ракет «Нептун» в Орловской области, также реактивных БПЛА в направлении Московской области.
В Уфе (1350 км от ГГУ) сообщается об атаке БПЛА на промзону, где расположены несколько НПЗ «Башнефти». Вероятно, именно они и оказались под ударом.
🤷♀️Удары по логистике ВСРФ в тылу оккупированных областей продолжаются, несмотря на отсутствие публичной огласки.
518 подтверждённых ударов за 20 дней сентября (в среднем 26 в день). Уже 4й месяц сохраняем ранее заданную тенденцию.
source.
Showing the 12 most recent of 308 posts we hold for @oko_gora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@oko_gora edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПЕТРЕНКО ✙ @petrenko_iHS · 35,416 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
Exilenova+ @exilenova_plus · 287,167 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
Dnipro Osint ⟨ Гарбуз ⟩ @DniproOfficial · 34,270 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
✙ Хамелеон @xameleon_ua · 24,893 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
✙ Ви хочете як в Україні? @DailyUkrainianNews · 26,211 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 September 2026
Алексей Копытько @kopytkoav · 26,768 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Соняшник🦅 @soniah_hub · 41,876 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
✙Resurgam✙ @resurgammmm · 55,369 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Легіон Диванної Розвідки 🇺🇦🔱 @couch_iu · 31,419 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
КіберБорошно | CyberBoroshno @kiber_boroshno · 67,746 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
✙Гострі Картузи✙ @gostrikartuzy · 25,700 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
Marmuletik🇺🇦 @marmuletik · 50,665 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
Позивний Каппа @KappaHimera · 52,149 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
PEKHNO🇺🇦 @pekhno_news · 68,199 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Александр Коваленко @zloyodessit · 82,374 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Офіцер @officer_33 · 183,325 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
OsintFlow ✙ @osintflow · 30,196 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
Быть Или @ToBeOr_Official · 303,514 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Танки. История и современность. Btvt.info @btvt2019 · 24,083 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 September 2026
Денис Казанський @kazansky2017 · 149,177 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
1⃣ Майsтерня_КR @IMS_KR_TM · 128,236 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 10 September 2026
YIGAL LEVIN @yigal_levin · 219,263 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Розвідник ✙ @rozvidnuk_1 · 51,528 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
donetchanyn @donetchan · 24,168 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 88 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Око Гора ✙ Новости и аналитика” (@oko_gora), 67,839 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oko_gora.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
