Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 93 days, net -1,606. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,988–32,076 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 14:08
30,229
-11
6 Nov 2026, 13:58
30,240
-21
5 Nov 2026, 11:40
30,261
-6
4 Nov 2026, 13:27
30,267
-12
3 Nov 2026, 16:09
30,279
-13
2 Nov 2026, 19:00
30,292
-8
1 Nov 2026, 18:26
30,300
-16
31 Oct 2026, 18:08
30,316
-3
30 Oct 2026, 18:57
30,319
-13
29 Oct 2026, 18:28
30,332
-26
28 Oct 2026, 17:36
30,358
-20
27 Oct 2026, 20:00
30,378
-29
26 Oct 2026, 22:56
30,407
-27
25 Oct 2026, 22:21
30,434
-29
24 Oct 2026, 19:30
30,463
-24
23 Oct 2026, 17:35
30,487
-33
22 Oct 2026, 18:28
30,520
-27
21 Oct 2026, 15:06
30,547
-17
20 Oct 2026, 12:28
30,564
-30
19 Oct 2026, 14:36
30,594
first reading
Engagement
1,220 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 30,229 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,110
414 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
414
of 1,220 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
1,220 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
2,527,940
Reactions total
56,712
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,800
Videos
≈224
Links
≈6,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 57s
Average length
1m 30s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
123,647 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
42,134
34.1%
🙏
34,843
28.2%
❤
22,838
18.5%
👍
6,309
5.10%
😢
5,767
4.66%
🔥
3,307
2.67%
😭
1,408
1.14%
👀
830
0.671%
💔
777
0.628%
🎉
725
0.586%
😱
652
0.527%
🌚
578
0.467%
🫡
551
0.446%
😈
503
0.407%
👌
378
0.306%
😍
370
0.299%
👏
338
0.273%
🤓
225
0.182%
🆒
211
0.171%
😨
208
0.168%
14 further kinds
695
0.562%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123,647 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
286
across the posts below
Posts paid on
123
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @myro_shnykov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 414 posts held from the last 30 days (3.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Очевидно, що кіріл дмітрієв втюхав трампу чергову кістку ("енергетичне перемирʼя" до кінця року та допустив, що Україна може контролювати частину Донеччини).
Той повівся і почав ганятися за кісткою.
Але ж. Цього не буде))
1. рф скаже, що не буде "енергетичного перемирʼя" без виконання низьки умов
2. Пункт щодо Донеччини буде обовʼязковим для виконання п.1 - тобто рф пізніше все одно буде вимагати вийти з Донеччин…
Останніми днями та тижнями можна було помітити ще більшу активізацію ворога на деяких ділянках фронту.
У зведеннях ГШ цифра в 2000+ ліквідованих ворогів стала в певній мірі буденністю.
Насправді, пояснення доволі просте - ворог хоче якомога більше розширити сіряк та закріпитися там, де вже є накопичення груп, які просочилися.
Це робиться напередодні того, як "зеленка" ще не остаточно пішла + додалися тумани.
Вико…
Я все ж не вірю в нові пакети допомоги від США.
Але добиватися розблокування постачань за програмою USAI, де досі є непоставлена зброя на мільярди долларів, виділених ще за Байдена - треба.
І так, чим швидше станеться відставка геґсета - тим краще.
І було б непогано, якби того обісцяного колбі ще відправили у відставку.
🇺🇦Підписатися на канал🇺🇦
Ще понад 20 балістичних трампів та гіперзвукових кушнерів прилетіло по Київщині та Києву.
В підсумку, за 2,5 години маємо близько 30-ти мирних ініціатив та пісділів, через які світла не буде ще більше.
🇺🇦Підписатися на канал🇺🇦
Коли путін прямим текстом каже, що буде тиснути виключно на цивільних та на всю можливу цивільну інфраструктуру, поки ми не віддамо Донеччину - то США в такому випадку не повинні тиснути на нас щодо того ж.
Бо тоді США не посередники, а співучасники.
Бо коли військовим шляхом путін не може досягнути цієї мети, будь-яка допомога йому в цьому - це співучасть.
Шкода, що демократи не наберуть хоча б 275 місць в Палаті…
До восьми балістичних віткоффів прилетіло по Київщині/Києву за 2 хвилини.
Ще більше гуманістичних віткоффів, трампів та кушнерів очікуємо вночі.
🇺🇦Підписатися на канал🇺🇦
трамп звільнив з посади керівника апарату Білого дому Сьюзі Вайлз та призначить наступником Стівена Міллера, який заступить на посаду 09.11.26 р.
Вайлз була одним з останніх промінчиків адекватності (прагматичності) цієї адміністрації. А може, й останнім.
Міллер - це ідеологічний чорт з найупоротішого МАГА-крила республіканців та максимально лояльний до трампа.
Це такий собі Єрмак на максималках, з крайніми ідеоло…
Financial Times про позицію путіна щодо "мирного врегулювання":
"Я знищу всю вашу інфраструктуру, доки ви не погодитеся", — сказала друга особа, передаючи позицію путіна.
"До наступного року в Україні не залишиться жодної інфраструктури. Усі мости, порти, залізниці, енергетична інфраструктура, електростанції… — усе буде знищено".
путін зажадав, щоб Україна передала Росії решту території Донбасу як попередню умову…
А чому президент США зустрічається з російським представником, але не зустічається з українським?
Мовчу вже про те, що ця зустріч не була запланована та є грубим порушенням протоколу (не дотримано рівень представництва).
Але схоже, трампу - ок. Він з прибиральником чемоданчіка путіна скоро буде зустрічатися та говорити про геополітику.
🇺🇦Підписатися на канал🇺🇦
Дуже конкуренті гонки відбуваються в Луїзіані на двох округах (5-й та 6-й) до Палати Представників.
На даний момент, все виглядає так, що загальний рахунок буде 258-172 і ще 5 округів взагалі невідомі, бо там рахунок йде на десятки-сотні голосів, а непорахованих ще вистачає.
Тобто в підсумку може бути як 263-172, так і 258-177. Здається, що більш реальним виглядає 260-175.
Демократи не взяли жодного місця в Північ…
трамп: "Наші вибори настільки нечесні, що ви навіть собі не уявляєте"
Сказав чувак, який допомогав перекроїти межі 11 виборчих округів на користь традиційно республіканських😂
Але навіть там трампісти всралися.
По "перехопленних" округах демократи розгромили республіканців, на цей момент з рахунком 41:2 для Палати та 7:0 для Сенату.
Ну і всралися на виборах губернатора Техасу. А потенційно - ще й в Канзасі😂
То пр…
трамп на запитання журналіста про вбивство мирних цивільних у своїх квартирах в Україні: "Інша сторона теж вбиває, в росії теж гинуть цивільні".
Кончене тупе мурло.
Слів нема ніяких.
Просто бажаю цьому дебілу відчути все те, що відчуваємо ми щодня.
Тварюка така.
🇺🇦Підписатися на канал🇺🇦
💯611👍18❤3🌚3😱3🎉1👾1😈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,220 posts we hold for @myro_shnykov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Юрій Богданов @yb_ua · 26,120 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Zvиздец Мангусту @zvizdecmanhustu · 67,782 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Ю.Г. | Юрій Гудименко @gudymenko_official · 38,626 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
🇺🇦💥Бахмутський Балу 💥🇺🇦 @bakhmutskyy · 39,214 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
NewsSky.com.ua @nssky · 28,757 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
Armchair General UA ✙ @armchairgeneralUA · 43,207 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Киянин @h59tD5lcOqYwxNGU6 · 19,604 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 September 2026
Несемось! @Katimsya · 30,250 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
КOVALENKO @akovalenko1989 · 60,005 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Muchnoy ✙ Jugend @muchnoyjugend88 · 40,087 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Погляд Приходька @NazarPrykhodkoPlus · 21,862 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026
MYROTVORETS NEWS @myrotvoretsnews · 24,141 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
Думки Фронтовика ∆ @dumky_frontovyka · 54,646 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
🐻Балу HUB🐻 @BaluHUB777 · 53,100 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
ФРОНТ|«Ярл» @frontukrua · 19,342 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 September 2026
🇺🇦 МИСЯГІН 🇺🇦 @mysiagin · 21,469 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Roman Donik @romandonik · 21,377 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
Брати Яковлеви 🇺🇦 ꑭ @braty_yakovlevu · 25,515 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 September 2026
Marmuletik🇺🇦 @marmuletik · 49,951 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
ДОБРИК live @dobrik_live · 22,637 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
Істребін.UA @istrebin · 21,234 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 October 2026
СКАДОВСЬКИЙ ЗАХИСНИК @defender_skdvsk · 43,787 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
БЕРЛІНСЬКА @MariaBerlinska · 20,240 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 September 2026
Будем всех бамбить! @budem_bambit · 20,554 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 71 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MYROSHNYKOV” (@myro_shnykov), 30,229 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myro_shnykov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.