Договорённости о поставках российского дизельного топлива в США, достигнутые Трампом и Путиным, фактически оказались нежизнеспособными. Под давлением американских политиков и угрозой юридических последствий американские компании и операторы портовых терминалов отказались принимать российское топливо. В частности, губернатор Нью-Джерси прямо предупредила портовые и терминальные компании о возможных многомиллионных штр…

Channel
ПЕТРЕНКО ✙
@petrenko_iHS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,077subscribers
-542 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001863854271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @petrenko_iHS |
| Created | 3 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/petrenko_iHS |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:00 | 35,077 | -12 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:45 | 35,089 | -11 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:16 | 35,100 | -11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:55 | 35,111 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:19 | 35,124 | +15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 35,109 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 35,116 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:47 | 35,124 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 35,135 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:01 | 35,138 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 35,143 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 35,150 | -18 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:07 | 35,168 | -14 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:56 | 35,182 | -11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 35,193 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:50 | 35,201 | -17 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:08 | 35,218 | -14 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:00 | 35,232 | -16 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 35,248 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 35,251 | first reading |
Engagement
332 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 173 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 42.0%
- avg views ÷ 35,077 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 14,700
- 107 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.52%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 107
- of 332 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 55 of 107 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 332 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,575,900 |
| Reactions total | 12,505 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 19:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 48
- Videos
- 27
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1h 19m
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 136 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
56,483 reactions across 279 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 16,192 | 28.7% | |
| 🔥 | 6,226 | 11.0% | |
| 🙏 | 5,794 | 10.3% | |
| 👍 | 5,646 | 10.00% | |
| 💯 | 3,614 | 6.40% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3,359 | 5.95% | |
| ❤ | 3,052 | 5.40% | |
| 🤔 | 2,641 | 4.68% | |
| 😢 | 1,474 | 2.61% | |
| 😁 | 1,410 | 2.50% | |
| 🫡 | 1,053 | 1.86% | |
| 👏 | 831 | 1.47% | |
| 🤣 | 739 | 1.31% | |
| 👀 | 698 | 1.24% | |
| 👌 | 683 | 1.21% | |
| 😡 | 610 | 1.08% | |
| 🕊 | 474 | 0.839% | |
| 🤯 | 301 | 0.533% | |
| 😈 | 252 | 0.446% | |
| 😱 | 247 | 0.437% | |
| 17 further kinds | 1,187 | 2.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 280 of the 332 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56,483 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 332 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 14
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 9
- of 332 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @petrenko_iHS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 332 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 107 posts held from the last 30 days (0.935%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Российские ресурсы жалуются, что ВСУ размещают FPV-дроны не только вдоль дорог или на крышах зданий, но и непосредственно на опорах высоковольтных линий электропередачи. Такое размещение делает беспилотники особенно сложными для визуального обнаружения: на фоне проводов и металлических конструкций опоры их практически не заметно с земли.
Сегодня ночью беспилотники поразили Рязанский НПЗ. В результате атаки поражена установка первичной переработки нефти. Также сообщается о попадании по складу Wildberries в Рязани. В последние дни Украина проводит интенсивную серию ударов по российской нефтяной инфраструктуре, поражая как НПЗ, так и линейные производственно-диспетчерские станции (ЛПДС). Среди последних целей — ЛПДС «Самара» (2 ноября) и Ярославский НП…
Как и в случае с Малой Токмачкой, российские ресурсы теперь сообщают о боях за Уланово в Сумской области, захват которого Минобороны РФ объявило ещё 28 сентября. По сути, российские подразделения провели в населённом пункте так называемый «флаговтык», после чего в «кредит» объявили о его взятии. Примечательно, что российские военкоры и военные сами признают разрушительные последствия такой практики. По их словам, ло…
Несмотря на два заявления Минобороны РФ о захвате Малой Токмачки — 16 ноября и 17 декабря 2025 года, — российские ресурсы вынуждены признавать, что полностью установить контроль над населённым пунктом российским войскам так и не удалось. ВСУ продолжают удерживать позиции в западной и центральной частях посёлка.
Промежуточные выборы в США обернулись серьёзным поражением республиканцев: демократы получили контроль над обеими палатами Конгресса — Палатой представителей и Сенатом. Это существенно осложнит Трампу проведение собственной политики в оставшиеся два года президентства. Демократы намерены добиваться ограничения военной операции против Ирана, выступать за прекращение войны и добиваться усиления военной поддержки Украи…
Трёхсторонние переговоры России, Украины и США в Абу-Даби провалились ещё до своего начала. И дело даже не в том, что стороны не смогут договориться по конкретным территориальным вопросам. Проблема гораздо глубже: Москва видит для себя всё больше политических и экономических возможностей, которые могут оказаться выгоднее скорейшего завершения войны. Первый фактор — промежуточные выборы в США, которые проходят сегодн…
На Дергачевском направлении противник продвинулся вдоль участка границы между населёнными пунктами Казачья Лопань и Кудиевка.
По итогам второго тура президентских выборов в Болгарии, состоявшегося 1 ноября, победила Илияна Йотова. Она станет первой женщиной, избранной президентом Болгарии. В ходе предвыборной кампании Йотова выступала за дипломатическое урегулирование войны в Украине, утверждая, что военного решения конфликта не существует. Она также заявляла о недопустимости дальнейшего вовлечения Болгарии в военную поддержку Киева и выст…
Украина за три дня нанесла удары по трём крупным российским нефтеперерабатывающим предприятиям: Новокуйбышевскому НПЗ в Самарской области (30 октября), заводу «Башнефть-Новойл» в Уфе (31 октября) и НПЗ «Лукойл-Нижегороднефтеоргсинтез» в Кстове Нижегородской области (1 ноября). Совокупная мощность переработки этих предприятий составляет около 33 млн тонн нефти в год — примерно 10% всей российской нефтепереработки. По…
На северной окраине Купянска-Узлового и юго-восточной окраине Купянска российские штурмовые группы продолжают попытки пересечь район железнодорожной станции и закрепиться в городской застройке. Противник действует небольшими группами, наступая со стороны Подолов и лесополосы, расположенной восточнее железной дороги.
На Гуляйпольском направлении российские войска продолжают попытки инфильтрации в Верхнюю Терсу. По сообщениям операторов БПЛА ВСУ, существенных изменений в ситуации нет: противника удаётся своевременно обнаруживать и нейтрализовать. В районе Воздвижевки продолжаются ожесточённые встречные бои.
Showing the 12 most recent of 332 posts we hold for @petrenko_iHS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@petrenko_iHS edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 13 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 30 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @petrenko_iHS as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 16 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 1 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 22 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 5
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@deepstateua · 752,467#1
@oko_gora · 69,009#2
@dva_majors · 1,162,713#3
@rvvoenkor · 1,453,203#4
@xameleon_ua · 24,261#5
@ButusovPlus · 348,374#6
@divgen · 75,951#7
@shidnijfront · 4,549#8
@motopatriot78 · 41,989#9
@politsto · 20,302#10
@ukrbavovna · 802,668#11
@vert2026 · 114,092#12
@arx_spn · 1,016,850#13
@zvizdecmanhustu · 67,818#14
@ukraine_context · 93,521#15
@warhistoryalconafter · 478,540#16
@voenacher · 658,851#17
@belarusian_silovik · 450,116#18
@muchnoyjugend88 · 40,114#19
@uniannet · 702,230#20
@ateobreaking · 741,824#21
@wargonzo · 738,665#22
@nexta_live · 767,026#23
@zloyodessit · 81,455#24
@exilenova_plus · 323,205#25
@kozakpishe · 3,402#26
@warmapukraine · 1,243#27
@rezervsvo · 203,761#28
@bahshiddemon · 170,097#29
@asupersharij · 1,735,482#30
@yurasumy · 2,664,959#31
@defender_skdvsk · 43,810#32
@couch_iu · 30,966#33
@boris_rozhin · 751,775#34
@insiderukr · 2,156,553#35
@yigal_levin · 218,520#36
@kiber_boroshno · 69,743#37
@truexanewsua · 3,168,865#38
@tgp_news · 58,665#39
@ssternenko · 880,759#40
@tivaz_artillery · 41,512#41
@lachentyt · 1,581,031#42
@voynareal · 1,543,218#43
@myro_shnykov · 30,240#44
@war_monitor · 959,985#45
@Tsaplienko · 320,062#46
@DniproOfficial · 35,491#47
@apwagner · 313,540#48
@marmuletik · 49,973#49
@milinfolive · 614,799#50
@pandoras_box_ua · 157,918#51
@in_factum · 45,240#52
@kpszsu · 940,735#53
@ToBeOr_Official · 304,298#54
@nevzorovtv · 1,002,207#55
@readovkanews · 2,013,643#56
@ukrainian_militant · 63,096#57
@rezident_ua · 954,022#58
@MiliTJournal · 11,354#59
@ukrnastup · 132,983#60
@WarArchive_ua · 51,470#61
@astrapress · 350,066#62
@Tatarinov_Rus · 106,742#63
@bakhmutskyy · 39,334#64
@ejdailyru · 665,083#65
@gnilayachereha · 413,658#66
@Crimeanwind · 223,489#67
@infantmilitario · 276,039#68
@voenkorKotenok · 309,149#69
@notes_veterans · 274,060#70
@Z13_Separ · 208,919#71
@DonbassYasinovatayanaliniiOgnia · 34,235#72
@vysokygovorit · 486,171#73
@KRIGcomTM · 3,727 (as read 2 September 2026)#74
@u_now · 1,403,662#75
@Operatyvnyi_Donbas · 82,198#76
@stranaua · 334,742#77
@bomber_fighter · 525,743#78
@Majakovsk73 · 6,171#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@politsto · 20,302
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 September 2026
@zvizdecmanhustu · 67,818
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@oko_gora · 69,009
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
@motopatriot78 · 41,989
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
@xameleon_ua · 24,261
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
@muchnoyjugend88 · 40,114
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
@noel_reports · 4
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
@bakhmutskyy · 39,334
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
@defender_skdvsk · 43,810
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
@Suriyak_maps · 48,074
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@myro_shnykov · 30,240
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
@marmuletik · 49,973
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
@tgp_news · 58,665
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕТРЕНКО ✙” (@petrenko_iHS), 35,077 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petrenko_iHS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.