Розвідка на основі відкритих джерел та геопросторова розвідка.
Автор та єдиний адміністратор - Гарбуз, фахівець з геопросторової та супутникової розвідки
Geospatial intelligence
Зв'язок — @garbuzdniprobot
Created
8 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,850–34,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 09:17
34,270
+21
16 Sept 2026, 02:56
34,249
+71
14 Sept 2026, 08:17
34,178
+36
12 Sept 2026, 15:01
34,142
+25
10 Sept 2026, 13:59
34,117
+165
7 Sept 2026, 08:58
33,952
+31
4 Sept 2026, 10:58
33,921
+16
3 Sept 2026, 01:03
33,905
-5
2 Sept 2026, 00:58
33,910
-14
31 Aug 2026, 21:56
33,924
-10
31 Aug 2026, 00:53
33,934
-24
29 Aug 2026, 21:45
33,958
-10
28 Aug 2026, 20:34
33,968
+7
27 Aug 2026, 17:28
33,961
-3
25 Aug 2026, 17:36
33,964
-15
24 Aug 2026, 20:33
33,979
-36
23 Aug 2026, 06:24
34,015
-3
21 Aug 2026, 17:47
34,018
-5
20 Aug 2026, 12:13
34,023
-14
19 Aug 2026, 15:18
34,037
first reading
Engagement
125 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
65.8%
avg views ÷ 34,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,600
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 125 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
125 (3 August 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
1,579,320
Reactions total
36,694
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 03:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,150
Videos
≈1,090
Links
≈2,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10m 06s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
62,316 reactions across 123 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
30,022
48.2%
❤
10,803
17.3%
👍
8,822
14.2%
😁
3,893
6.25%
🤬
3,849
6.18%
🤔
1,259
2.02%
🙏
620
0.995%
🥰
529
0.849%
🤡
476
0.764%
👏
383
0.615%
🎃
272
0.436%
🫡
269
0.432%
🤩
144
0.231%
😍
119
0.191%
🤮
113
0.181%
😢
108
0.173%
❤🔥
100
0.16%
🍾
86
0.138%
🤣
84
0.135%
💔
82
0.132%
8 further kinds
283
0.454%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 125 of the 125 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62,706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
41
of 125 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DniproOfficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 125 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Якась плутанина у підсумку з цією нічною атакою, друзі, давайте трохи поясню:
Московський НПЗ уражено цілим авіапарком дронів, тільки дронів (та ракето-дронами)
Фламінго до цілі не долетіли
Пелікан - це не балістична ракета FP-7, це звичайний дрон.
І все, крапка. Фламінго не влучали по НПЗ, це не його ціль взагалі. Балістичні ракети ніякі не запускали
⚡️ У ніч проти 20 вересня Сили оборони вразили Московський НПЗ у Капотні - за оцінкою, уражено обидва вузли первинної переробки заводу
Перша точка - установка ЕЛОУ-АВТ-6 (55.644523,37.805698), друга - комплексна установка переробки нафти(КУПН) у складі комплексу «Євро+».
КУПН дуже сильно постраждала. АВТ-6 також прийняла на себе декілька ударів.
⚡️🛢 Сили оборони атакували Московський НПЗ. В результаті удару пошкоджено всі потужності первиної переробки, а також установка вториної переробки
Згідно геоінт горить установка АВТ-6 потужністю 7,8 млн т/рік, КУПН 6,86 млн т/рік. Виведення з ладу обох установок зупиняє завод повністю
Також уражена важлива установка ізомерізації, яка необхідна для виробництва АИ-92/95
Координати: 55.646116° 37.807547°
🎃 Dnipro Os…
🟦 ⚠️ «Алабуга» будує підземні цехи для виробництва «Шахедів». Вже побудовано близько 42 000 м² підземного простору під майбутні виробничі потужності.
Вочевидь, тема перенесення виробництва під землю з’явилася ще після перших українських ударів по «Алабузі». І зараз ми бачимо, наскільки швидко росіяни розгортають це будівництво.
На жаль, з часом уся екосистема російських «Гераней» стає дедалі складнішою та дорожчою…
По моїм підрахункам виходить +- так само, від 8 до 10% російської нафтопереробки паралізовано, і все це лише за першу половину вересня
На цьому тижні ми "вимкнули" одну з найпотужніших установок в РФ — ЕЛОУ-АВТ-6 Нижньокамського НПЗ. Проектна потужність 9,2 млн тонн нафти на рік, більше тільки ЕЛОУ-АВТ-12 Туапсинського НПЗ, яка досі працює, нажаль.
Треба продовжувати 😻
⚡️Команда OsintFlow продовжує оприлюднення даних російських окупантів.
На цей раз до нас потрапили доволі специфічні списки, а саме групи пошуку СЗЧ в складі в/с комендатур та військових частин, а також дані в/с які знаходились в СЗЧ. Також додаємо деякі документи з діяльності таких груп.
Інформація буде розбита на 2 частини, першу частину скачати 🔗👉 тут
🗣 Дані публікуються в первинному вигляді, без змін, і містя…
📡 Супутникові знімки знищеної авіації на аеродромі Ростов Центральний. В результаті атаки було знищено Ан-12, Ан-26 та гелікоптери Мі-8
Невеликий прогрєв вам перед якісними знімками борошна)
🎃 Dnipro Osint | Чат | Підтримати
У результаті ракетного удару українськими ракетами «Нептун» по «Атлант Аэро» в Таганрозі, підприємству, яке спеціалізується на виробництві безпілотних літальних апаратів та комплектувальних до них, було повністю знищено три виробничі будівлі.
В одному зі складських приміщень, яке використовувалося у військових цілях, зафіксовано обрушення покрівлі внаслідок ракетного удару. Площа ураження становить орієнтовно 60×40 …
🔥469❤67🫡21👍14🎃3😁3👎2🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 125 posts we hold for @DniproOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 76 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
КіберБорошно | CyberBoroshno @kiber_boroshno · 67,746 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Соняшник🦅 @soniah_hub · 41,876 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
WarArchive @WarArchive_ua · 50,547 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
OsintFlow ✙ @osintflow · 30,196 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
△ 225 ОШП △ @OSHP_225 · 23,986 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
Око Гора ✙ Новости и аналитика @oko_gora · 67,839 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Дивізіон-«ТІВАЗ» @tivaz_artillery · 41,392 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Соціально-Побутовий Журнал «Водограй» @mag_vodogray · 25,736 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 September 2026
In Factum @in_factum · 44,968 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Легіон Диванної Розвідки 🇺🇦🔱 @couch_iu · 31,419 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
47 окрема механізована бригада «Маґура» @brygada47 · 52,416 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Каменський Пацюк 🇺🇦🫡 @stone_rat · 26,297 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
monitorwar @monitoringwar · 26,550 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Тарас Григорович повідомляє @tgp_news · 58,052 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Airborne Division @airborne1126 · 28,287 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
KARYMAT @karymat · 73,150 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Повернись живим @savelifeua · 24,692 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
СКАДОВСЬКИЙ ЗАХИСНИК @defender_skdvsk · 41,848 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Molfar про OSINT @molfar_global · 51,742 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Bochkala_WAR @bochkala_war · 40,148 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
DroneBomber✙ @dronebomber · 59,379 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
НІП «Тиск» @TyskNIP · 29,298 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
✙Гострі Картузи✙ @gostrikartuzy · 25,700 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
Думки Фронтовика ∆ @dumky_frontovyka · 55,042 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 59 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Операція «Павутина»(uk.wikipedia.org) “…date=2025-06-01|accessdate=2025-06-03}}{{cite web|url=https://t.me/DniproOfficial/6125|title=Допис, опублікований 1 червня 2025 року об 14:13…” read 13 September 2026
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dnipro Osint ⟨ Гарбуз ⟩” (@DniproOfficial), 34,270 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DniproOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.