Деякі люди коли думають мають внутрішній голос, деякі не мають. А деякі явно думають презентаціями зі студентської курсової.
custom 581213077781872961393👍35custom 58144488833375308216🫡2custom 54383441892742448741

Channel
@sampleName32
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,274subscribers
+137 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001308428423 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sampleName32 |
| Created | 20 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sampleName32 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:59 | 12,274 | +63 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 12,211 | +21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 12,190 | +63 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 12,127 | +29 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 12,098 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 12,097 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 12,107 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 12,105 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 12,113 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 12,118 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 12,122 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 12,118 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 12,123 | -13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:40 | 12,136 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 12,137 | first reading |
86 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 86 (2 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 528,020 |
| Reactions total | 18,011 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17,249 reactions across 80 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5368843784404607699 | 3,496 | 20.3% | |
| 👍 | 3,281 | 19.0% | |
| 😢 | 1,937 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5221988780856057013 | 1,457 | 8.45% | |
| 🤯 | 1,396 | 8.09% | |
| 🫡 | 1,323 | 7.67% | |
| custom 4997166218075964355 | 1,036 | 6.01% | |
| custom 5814448883337530821 | 673 | 3.90% | |
| 🥰 | 665 | 3.86% | |
| custom 5312050100409737393 | 629 | 3.65% | |
| custom 5438344189274244874 | 429 | 2.49% | |
| custom 5359777202932048807 | 418 | 2.42% | |
| custom 5812130777818729613 | 311 | 1.80% | |
| 👎 | 198 | 1.15% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,011reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Деякі люди коли думають мають внутрішній голос, деякі не мають. А деякі явно думають презентаціями зі студентської курсової.
custom 581213077781872961393👍35custom 58144488833375308216🫡2custom 54383441892742448741
Гидкіше ніж підстрелений тільки дури що стоять навколо нього на лінії вогню
custom 531205010040973739392👍68custom 536884378440460769927👎4custom 53597772029320488072
Він ще з вогнепальними пораненнями далі повз атакувати. Ну, в 225 навчать Родіну любіть.
custom 5368843784404607699121custom 531205010040973739331custom 581213077781872961312🤯6🥰4
Три удари ножем військовому ТЦК та погроза вбивством поліцейському: 25-річному львів’янину повідомлено про підозру За даними слідства, 21 серпня близько 23:00 у Львові під час заходів з оповіщення військовослужбовці Личаківсько-Залізничного РТЦК та СП спільно з поліцією зупинили 25-річного місцевого мешканця. Чоловік не виконав вимогу пред'явити військово-обліковий документ, почав відходити, а потім намагався втект…
😢193🥰36custom 522198878085605701332👍11custom 58121307778187296137
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=M8gYvI-aFpE
👎37custom 499716621807596435523🥰15custom 52219887808560570136custom 58144488833375308211
друзі нагороджені, проходім в «Принцип», не соромимось, заповнюємо анкетку
custom 536884378440460769997👍19custom 54383441892742448746custom 53597772029320488073custom 52219887808560570132
❗ Знову фпв вдарила по маршрутці Попередньо: є постраждалі Ми в 📲 WhatsApp 📲 Instagram 📲 TikTok 📲 Threads
😢210custom 52219887808560570137👍2custom 54383441892742448742👎1
Кадры, на которых хуситский дрон сбрасывает боеприпас на саудовский танк M1A2S Abrams MBT недалеко от Мариба, что приводит к пожару боеприпасов в танке. Дата неизвестна, но хуситы опубликовали видео примерно в 16:00 по местному времени.
custom 5814448883337530821130😢30🥰10custom 53688437844046076997custom 58121307778187296137
Все таки містер Зелупа з дорогим БРАТОМ не розпрощався
🤯181custom 499716621807596435569🥰18custom 522198878085605701316custom 58144488833375308213
Тепер всі ключові тексти про Велику війну можна знайти і прочитати в одному місці. У свій час мене вразив сюжет Франції в Першу світову і мені захотілось про нього поділитись, щоб не я один жив із цими знаннями. Крок за кроком виник цілий цикл статей. Культ Наступу Дух 14-го Контрнаступ, що мав закінчити війну Верден 1916 Бійня Нівеля Із самого початку весь основний задум будувався навколо "Наступу Нівеля". Над ни…
👍61custom 499716621807596435531🥰7custom 58121307778187296132custom 53597772029320488071
Не певен, що питання мобілізації це парафія правозахисників. Але поки що є підстави для оптимізму.
🫡113custom 536884378440460769925👍1
Маестро
👍174custom 531205010040973739364custom 536884378440460769947custom 581444888333753082111👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @sampleName32. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 8,004 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sample Channel Name #32” (@sampleName32), 12,274 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sampleName32.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.