Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ME NE FREGO ✙ 🇺🇦

Channel

ME NE FREGO ✙ 🇺🇦

@MeNeFreg8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,778subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001384685719
TypeChannel
Username@MeNeFreg8
DescriptionРупор правої антисистеми @Christ_is_king_83 - Зв'язок @fashkomments — чат @MeNeFreg8 — посилання для друга 4441111073717575 https://t.me/+RKP7TsKX6mQ3NmQy — допомога проекту
Created17 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MeNeFreg8

Growth

11,73611,78011,7586 August 2026 — 11,758 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,758 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,759 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,753 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,746 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,740 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,736 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,756 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,765 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,758 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,748 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,752 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,751 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,748 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,753 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,764 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,757 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,768 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,776 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,774 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,773 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,780 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,774 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,778 subscribers11,7786 August 202630 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,729–11,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 00:0511,778+4
29 Aug 2026, 03:2411,774-6
28 Aug 2026, 02:3511,780+7
27 Aug 2026, 05:4611,773-1
26 Aug 2026, 07:1611,774-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:4211,776+8
24 Aug 2026, 06:0211,768+11
22 Aug 2026, 16:2911,757-7
21 Aug 2026, 07:5411,764+11
20 Aug 2026, 06:4611,753+5
19 Aug 2026, 09:5611,748-3
18 Aug 2026, 06:3211,751-1
17 Aug 2026, 09:2811,752+4
15 Aug 2026, 18:0311,748-10
14 Aug 2026, 07:0711,758-7
12 Aug 2026, 21:3811,765+9
11 Aug 2026, 18:3311,756+20
10 Aug 2026, 15:1311,736-4
9 Aug 2026, 17:0311,740-6
8 Aug 2026, 17:3311,746first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 11,778 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,310
97 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held105 (30 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total224,260
Reactions total10,007
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13,800
Videos
2,430
Links
3,520

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 30s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,828 reactions across 104 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁5,26948.7%
🤣1,26811.7%
9448.72%
👍4213.89%
🫡4043.73%
💯3663.38%
😢3323.07%
😡2982.75%
2962.73%
🎃2492.30%
🤡1801.66%
🔥1641.51%
🤮1101.02%
🍌900.831%
🤔700.646%
👌540.499%
💊360.332%
😭360.332%
👀300.277%
🙏270.249%
17 further kinds1841.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,828reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 104 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MeNeFreg8. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 105 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC≈1,850 views121 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Well well well ME NE FREGO☠️🇺🇦

😁10374🎃4🤣2🤮1

29 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,700 views38 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Цілі досягнуто. Дякую всім хто задонатив як малі так і великі суми. Також дякую каналам які зробили репост. Не можу повною мірою висловити захват від вас, менше ніж за 6 годин зібрали всю суму. Вже найближчим часом оплатимо адвоката. Але це не кінець збору, а тільки перша його частина. Пізніше буде збір на лікування, тому банку не закриваємо. Також роблю маленький анонс в вигляді того що через деякий час буде невел

29👍7🔥1🤣1

29 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,470 views36 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁21💊11🤮4

Signed Олексій Мендельсон

29 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,490 views29 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Банку розблоковано

👌20👍9

29 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,540 views39 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Монобанк втратив голову від вашої потужності і обмежив банку, поки розбираємось з підтримкою можете задонатити на резервну: https://send.monobank.ua/jar/8knkSUWhdF Всім дуже дякую, неймовірний фідбек, майже зібрали всю суму за 4 години

27👍7😁5

29 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈6,130 views64 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Просимо вашої допомоги. Наш засновник та адміністратор, товариш Фенікс, зараз опинився у дуже складній ситуації. Після поранення він проходить реабілітацію та потребує юридичної допомоги. Необхідно вирішити питання з документами, оформленням інвалідності, УБД та іншими юридичними питаннями, які виникли після поранення. Необхідно допомогти йому оплатити послуги адвоката. Ціль збору - 25 000 грн. Для нього зараз ц

40👍10😁10😢2🍌1🤣1

29 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,640 views72 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

??? ME NE FREGO 🇺🇦☠

46😁23👍3

Signed Nosferatu

29 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈1,840 views125 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Русня — пітухи ME NE FREGO 🇺🇦☠

😁91🤣29🤮4👍1

Signed Nosferatu

29 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,680 views77 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @svitanokstarovynyPhoto

Чи знали Ви, що польський король Стефан Баторій (1576-1586) в час Лівонської війни пропонував масковському цареві івану грозному вирішити конфлікт дуеллю? 🤺 «Чому ти, московський фараоне, не прийшов до нас із своїм військом? Чому не захищав своїх підданих?Навіть курка нещасна ховає своїх пташенят під крило, коли нападає яструб, а ти, що печатку з двоголовим орлом носиш, ховаєшся по закутках! Жалієш, кажеш, християнс

😁679👍1

28 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC≈2,080 views131 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Я вважаю шо роль британської авіації переоцінена, про неї багато говорять, але назвати реальні кейси де британці у повітрі розіб'ють італійську аєронавтіку мало хто може (с) "Крилатий Цезар" Мікеле Федерічі ME NE FREGO☠️🇺🇦

😁1179🔥3🎃1👍1

28 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,990 views140 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Попитка — не питка, як говориться. Похитати човен і прийти до влади не вийшло. Ну хоч політично пенсію спокійно доживе в Італії.

😁94🤣32🍌7🤡32👍2

28 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,680 views88 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @h37siwwh

Від багатьох правих я чув, що "кидати зіги", чітко висловлювати свої погляди - це контрпродуктивно. Вигідніше одягти костюм, десь підлаштуватись, а потім, взявши владу, все поміняти. Скіни 00-х часто закликали йти у силові структури, щоб змінити систему зсередини, зараз теж саме пропонують "праві" типу Дмитра Корчинського. Але вже 80+ років ця стратегія, емпірично, терпить крах. Колишній фашист Джорджіо Альміранте н

4024🤔11🤣9🤡3💯1

Signed Олексій Мендельсон

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @MeNeFreg8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@MeNeFreg8 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTCAnonymous Poll541 voters

Завтра

  1. Пиздити ментів за ліс, бабульок та жінок з дітьми38%
  2. Пиздити бабульок та жінок з дітьми19%
  3. Пиздити ліс43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 19,304 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Nord Division
@norddivision11 · 44,181
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
ДОХЛІ РАСІЯНЄ ✙
@dokhlyye_rossiyane · 105,150
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
Жорін /// Третій армійський корпус
@MaksymZhorin · 108,843
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Русский Добровольческий Корпус
@rvc_army · 114,171
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ME NE FREGO ✙ 🇺🇦” (@MeNeFreg8), 11,778 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MeNeFreg8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.