Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for STALKERUA

Channel

STALKERUA

@ua_stalker

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

8,401subscribers

+239 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001168562566
TypeChannel
Username@ua_stalker
Created20 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ua_stalker

Growth

7,8038,4018,1026 August 2026 — 8,162 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,162 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,168 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,233 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,803 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,929 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,059 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,155 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,214 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,258 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,335 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,401 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net +239. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,713–8,491 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 14:218,401+66
31 Aug 2026, 22:368,335+77
28 Aug 2026, 12:568,258+44
25 Aug 2026, 12:058,214+59
22 Aug 2026, 22:058,155+96
19 Aug 2026, 10:278,059+130
16 Aug 2026, 17:237,929+126
12 Aug 2026, 23:257,803-430
10 Aug 2026, 00:298,233+65
6 Aug 2026, 14:438,168+6
6 Aug 2026, 03:038,162no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:248,162first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.3%
avg views ÷ 8,401 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,960
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held41 (22 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total50,401
Reactions total980
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,998 reactions across 38 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍72036.0%
😁45222.6%
41320.7%
🔥31215.6%
👎683.40%
😢331.65%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,075 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 39 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ua_stalker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC621 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @ivanoisePhoto

Це називається «Розвідка передає полумʼяний привіт НАБУ та іншим зацікавленим особам». Як відомо, зараз НАБУ разом із Фіалою та його ЗМІ намагаються збити Буданова. Вочевидь для того, аби посадити в його крісло когось зі зрозумілих їм професійних грантоїдів, як це вже вдалося зробити у низці міністерств. З виборами у них не склалося, тож хочуть отримати якомога більше найвищих постів, оточивши таким чином Президент

🔥24😁17👎64👍2

Signed ST

24 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,480 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Деталі тої події ледь не щороку розповідаю. Краще послухайте пісню, ситуація описана там +- яка була зі мною, як і з безліччю добровольців спекотного літа 2014. https://youtu.be/dGbN6f6etQA?si=dmtlBMmg8lP8a8rb

15👍3🔥1

Signed ST

24 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC≈1,470 views59 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Уже 12 років у мене між сракою і тазовою кісткою такий здоровий друг. Все ж 125 мм танковий фугас який вибухнув у 5-ти метрах в полі від тебе, то не жарти. Символічно, що другий день народження припав на День Незалежності.

👍3817🔥2😁1😢1

Signed ST

20 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC≈2,690 views78 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Ех, 17 років з моменту цієї фотки пройшло. Навіть тоді, у 15 не тримав палець на гачку)

🔥5511👍8😁4

Signed ST

20 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈2,340 views69 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Писати більше подібних публікацій?

👍60😁5👎4

Signed ST

20 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈2,290 views30 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

[2/2] 23 лютого 1971 року армія і поліція почали штурм Сбарре. Барикади ламали одну за одною. Організований опір поступово придушили. Восьмимісячне повстання закінчилося. Але його значення виходило далеко за межі питання про столицю Калабрії. Реджо стало одним із символів тієї Італії, де політична боротьба вже перетворювалася на вуличну війну. Саме тому історію повстання неможливо відокремити від «свинцевих років». Д

👍246

Signed ST

20 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,630 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026

«Boia chi molla» можна перекласти як «ганьба тому, хто здається» або точніше «проклятий той, хто відступає». Другий варіант краще передає суть: той, хто здав позиції і покинув боротьбу, зрадив своїх. Гасло значно старше за події в Реджо-Калабрії. Його походження точно не відоме, його пов’язують з різними епізодами італійської історії від повстань XVIII–XIX століть до Першої світової війни, де воно звучало серед Ardi

👍13🔥42😁1

Signed ST

20 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,430 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Все ж є щось прекрасне ув цьому італійському футуризмі

30👍4🔥2

Signed ST

19 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,740 views113 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Рада проголосувала за Хмару. Тепер він МО. 🔥🔥🔥

👍7519👎11🔥4😁4

Signed ST

19 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈1,800 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Залітайте https://youtu.be/WhEJfeHC94E?si=M9UoYWCqrvpSvgK6

24👍8😁2🔥1

Signed ST

18 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC≈1,890 views97 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Сільський фемінізм. Один чоловік якось відпочивав у рідних у селі та помітив: інколи бува, що курка починає кукурікати, тобто співати півнем. Чи то вона кукурікає, що всі півні «козли», чи може, що сільський хлів то не для її курячої величності - простим селянам прогресивних курей не зрозуміти. Але старші люди знали точно одне - якщо курка заспівала півнем, то нестися вона вже ніколи не буде. І доля її була визначе

😁87🔥82

Signed ST

17 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈7,120 views97 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Дуже риторичне питання щодо ймовірного очолення Андрієм Євгенійовичем посади командувача Об’єднаних сил. Як на мене, він був би одним із найкращих варіантів на посаду головкома. Але якщо Білецького призначать командувачем Об’єднаних сил і для нього це буде таким собі перехідним етапом до посади головкома, то чому б і ні? Він освічений, має фах, реальний бойовий та командний досвід і, що для мене особливо важливо, ві

👍57🔥1711👎6😁6

Signed ST

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @ua_stalker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ua_stalker edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTCAnonymous Poll341 voters

Ефір проведемо сьогодні об 20:00 обирайте тему

  1. Хто такі сучасні українські праві? Новітня історія руху. Загальне окреслення вектору правих35%
  2. Що таке етноцентризм і етноплюралізм як ідеологічний фундамент нових правих.18%
  3. Як працюють іноземні агенти впливу хто такі ці «соросята». Які їхні цілі, як з ними боротись?46%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTCAnonymous Poll667 voters

Поляки побили українця у Польщі. Які ваші думки? Голосуйте і ставте коментарі

  1. Треба вписуватись, бо це українець і ми маємо заступатися за своїх77%
  2. Не варто заступатися, бо він зрадив вітчизну, виїхав у пошуках кращої долі.28%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

НІП «Тиск»
@TyskNIP · 29,170
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Nord Division
@norddivision11 · 44,450
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
Sergii Ivanov
@ivanoise · 32,000
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
Жорін /// Третій армійський корпус
@MaksymZhorin · 108,636
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Стугна
@publicreservestugna · 141,118
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
DOSH
@lumpen_v · 34,320
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
PSDinfo 🇺🇦
@PSDinfo · 54,609
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
ДОХЛІ РАСІЯНЄ ✙
@dokhlyye_rossiyane · 105,302
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
Євген Карась ✙
@karas_evgen · 164,287
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Тимчина Максим Ігорович (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…гідності|Революції гідності]].{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/s/ua_stalker?before=5075 |title=На фронті у бою з ворогом загинув Тимчина…”
read 6 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“STALKERUA” (@ua_stalker), 8,401 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ua_stalker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.