Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 95 days, net -473. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,340–24,955 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 20:49
24,411
-15
7 Nov 2026, 14:18
24,426
-19
6 Nov 2026, 12:06
24,445
-10
5 Nov 2026, 13:21
24,455
-9
4 Nov 2026, 16:15
24,464
-12
3 Nov 2026, 17:40
24,476
-5
2 Nov 2026, 15:05
24,481
-9
1 Nov 2026, 11:45
24,490
-6
31 Oct 2026, 15:07
24,496
-16
30 Oct 2026, 14:57
24,512
-5
29 Oct 2026, 16:15
24,517
-10
28 Oct 2026, 18:29
24,527
-3
27 Oct 2026, 16:56
24,530
-10
26 Oct 2026, 13:16
24,540
-8
24 Oct 2026, 14:16
24,548
-1
23 Oct 2026, 11:54
24,549
+6
22 Oct 2026, 11:57
24,543
-15
21 Oct 2026, 02:47
24,558
-2
20 Oct 2026, 02:56
24,560
-1
19 Oct 2026, 02:26
24,561
first reading
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 128 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.5%
avg views ÷ 24,411 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,210
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
105 (27 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
230,700
Reactions total
8,864
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25m 41s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29,572 reactions across 102 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
21,071
71.3%
👍
3,814
12.9%
🔥
3,025
10.2%
🙏
430
1.45%
😁
331
1.12%
❤🔥
268
0.906%
💔
260
0.879%
🫡
150
0.507%
👏
76
0.257%
🤯
50
0.169%
👀
15
0.051%
😢
14
0.047%
🤝
12
0.041%
🤔
9
0.03%
😍
6
0.02%
🤡
6
0.02%
👎
5
0.017%
🖕
4
0.014%
😱
4
0.014%
🤬
4
0.014%
10 further kinds
18
0.061%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Військові 93-ї ОМБр мали евакуювати поранену цивільну пані. Але через високу активність російських FPV-дронів місія розтягнулася аж на дві доби.
Попри всі труднощі, робобро довіз пані до безпечної точки, звідки військові відвезли її до лікарні.
Йой, та навіщо ми вам усе переповідаємо? Краще вмикайте репортаж робобро 👆
І, звісно, донатьте, аби військові мали більше робобро для евакуації поранених: bit.ly/4AsGsJW
«Азов» на першому місці — у Лізі «Дронопаду» нові переможці 👏
У жовтні сталося те, чого давно не було: найбільше дронів збили бригади, а не зенітні ракетні полки. 12-та бригада спеціального призначення «Азов» лідирує з великим відривом 😎
Чи побачимо ми «камбек» від ЗРП? Або, можливо, на нас чекає серія перемог від нових чемпіонів? Дізнаємося вже наступного місяця!
А поки донатимо на «Дронопад» — bit.ly/4dbAwZL
Маємо дещо вам розказати.
Пікапи, які передає війську Фонд, в більшості випадків все-таки фарбуються. Це роблять самі військові, відповідно до своїх задач. Ми цей процес ніяк не контролюємо.
І нас дуже розчулює коли військові, за своїм бажанням, залишають на машинах логотип Фонду. Більше того, інколи вони навіть просять вислати трафарети, аби самостійно його нанести після перефарбування.
Ці фото зробили наш день, …
Що робити із загрозою FPV-дронів?
Давайте памʼятати, що маленькі дрони, які не видно на мапах тривог, вбивають більше людей, ніж «Шахеди».
Це проблема, про яку зараз говорять менше. Але удари FPV-дронів по прифронтових містах та позиціях військових — явище постійне та смертельно небезпечне.
Ефективні та поширені засоби протидії FPV-дронам можна поділити на дві категорії:
• захист: РЕБ, укриття, маскування, антидро…
Куди поділися гноми із JYSK? Вони підштовхують збір на НРК-евакуації!
З 5 до 29 листопада 10 гривень з кожного продажу різдвяних гномів, гусей чи пінгвінів летять на збір RoboBro. Шукайте їх в усіх магазинах мережі JYSK або замовляйте онлайн.
Це вже не перша благодійна колаборація JYSK та «Повернись живим». З 2022 року, завдяки спільним активностям вдалося зібрати майже 21 млн грн, зокрема, на гуманітарне розмінува…
Хто ще не куштував томатний шоколад? 🍅
У вас все ще є така нагода, але це ненадовго — лімітовану благодійну шоколадку майже розкупили. А всі кошти з продажу йдуть на потреби «Дронопаду» 🤝
Придбати плиточку можна тут — https://nomerdomu.com.ua/product/chornyi_shokolad_z_tomatamy_ta_pertsiamy/
Два за ціною одного — морпіхи збили два «Шахеди» одним перехоплювачем!
На Донецькому напрямку бійці 38-ї ОБрМП наздогнали групу ворожих дронів, які летіли на невеликій дистанції одне від одного. Їм вдалося збити одразу два борти одним безпілотником — такого ми ще не бачили 😳
Це ще один приклад ефективності «Дронопаду» та його підрозділів. Підтримайте їх роботу донатом 👉 https://bit.ly/4ftdtvn
135 дронів з тепловізійною камерою для оборони Костянтинівки
Поки ви читаєте це, тривають бої як у самому місті, так і на його околицях. Оборонці Костянтинівки стримують ворога, аби не дати йому взяти місто в кільце та прорватися вглиб Донецької області — зокрема до Дружківки й Краматорська. У цьому їм допомагатимуть тепловізійні дрони, придбані за понад 25 млн грн ваших донатів на «поточку».
Усього за лічені дні п…
Передаємо вам подяку від 18-ї Словʼянської бригади НГУ 🫶
Військові отримали живлення, звʼязок та оргтехніку для пунктів спостереження на суму 1 583 698 грн. Це майно придбано завдяки донатам на ту саму «поточку», про яку ми постійно говоримо.
Дякуємо вам та просимо не зупинятись — https://bit.ly/cba-donate-weekly
Ваші донати — наші позитивні емоції. Завжди 🫶
Бо кожна гривня йде на підтримку армії та допомагає військовим. Донатьте регулярно, оформлюйте підписку — https://bit.ly/cba-donate-weekly
Більше можливостей рятувати: разом із Vodafone передали медичне майно підрозділам Третього армійського корпусу на 7,7 млн грн.
Зокрема, медики 4-го окремого медичного батальйону отримали обладнання для роботи з кров’ю та її компонентами й засоби для практичних занять із догоспітальної допомоги.
Для тренувань військовим передали турнікети, гемостатики й оклюзійні наліпки, а також навчальні манекени, на яких можна ві…
Війна в кредит: понад 100 уражених потягів
Противник щосили намагається створити картину успішного захоплення населених пунктів, але не здатен захистити ключові залізничні станції, якими проходить ланцюжок постачання пального в бік фронту. Ні МВГ, ні засоби РЕБ не в змозі убезпечити логістичні шляхи окупаційного угруповання.
Завдяки вашим донатам та роботі фонду «Повернись живим», що передали 440 Starlink Mini, в р…
🔥195❤54👍14
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @savelifeua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@savelifeua edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 October 2026
Most recent edit
25 October 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В якому вигляді вам подобаються більш довгі дописи в каналі?
Краще робити «горталку» — більша частина тексту на зображеннях29%
Краще текст залишати в самому дописі71%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Антигуманістичне гатіння @jokes_over_200 · 29,249 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 11 September 2026
Сергій Притула @serhiyprytula · 114,321 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
Roman Donik @romandonik · 21,377 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
4 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Mini Shark(uk.wikipedia.org) “…{{Cite web|title=«Повернись живим» Фонд допомоги армії|url=https://t.me/savelifeua/2013|website=Telegram|accessdate=2024-02-01}}
3 вересня…” read 1 November 2026
Померли в березні 2022(uk.wikipedia.org) “…український військовик, [[Герой України]] (2022){{Cite web|url=https://t.me/savelifeua/914|назва=Знайомтеся, це — морпіх із позивним «Турист»|видавець=«Повернись…” read 1 November 2026
Проєкти фонду «Повернись живим»(uk.wikipedia.org) “…org/web/20230410074427/https://t.me/savelifeua/1374|url-status=live}} {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230410074427/https://t.me/savelifeua/1374 |date=2023-04-10…” read 1 November 2026
Тімоті Ґартон Еш(uk.wikipedia.org) “…com|language=uk|access-date=2024-05-16}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/savelifeua/2579|title=Повернись живим|website=Telegram|access-date=2024-05-16}}…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Повернись живим” (@savelifeua), 24,411 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/savelifeua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.