National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 17 days, net -2,265. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 415,932–418,877 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 16:13
416,272
-198
21 Aug 2026, 06:33
416,470
-126
20 Aug 2026, 08:07
416,596
-177
19 Aug 2026, 07:18
416,773
-155
18 Aug 2026, 10:04
416,928
-132
17 Aug 2026, 11:04
417,060
-175
15 Aug 2026, 18:12
417,235
-170
14 Aug 2026, 09:25
417,405
-209
12 Aug 2026, 23:35
417,614
-127
11 Aug 2026, 23:42
417,741
-125
11 Aug 2026, 01:16
417,866
-153
10 Aug 2026, 01:45
418,019
-121
9 Aug 2026, 02:51
418,140
-128
7 Aug 2026, 23:18
418,268
-135
6 Aug 2026, 20:31
418,403
-134
6 Aug 2026, 02:36
418,537
first reading
Engagement
321 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 416,272 subscribers
Avg views / post
50,600
321 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
321
of 321 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
321 (5 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
16,228,700
Reactions total
363,909
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31m 13s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
348,235 reactions across 306 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
98,587
28.3%
❤
69,991
20.1%
👍
67,984
19.5%
😢
46,649
13.4%
🤡
28,582
8.21%
🙏
20,986
6.03%
😁
8,309
2.39%
🔥
5,603
1.61%
👎
1,544
0.443%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 321 of the 321 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363,909reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 321 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
124
across the posts below
Posts paid on
53
of 321 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UkraineNow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 321 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сили оборони уразили Новокуйбишевський НПЗ за 1000 км від лінії фронту – це мільйони доларів на російську воєнну машину, - Зеленський
▪️атаковано логістичний хаб у Самарському регіоні,
▪️на аеродромі «Саки» знищено літак Су-24М і чотири одиниці аеродромної техніки,
▪️в Брянському регіоні ліквідовано ретранслятори для управління дронами, які атакували українські міста.
✅ Ми у Telegram | Viber
Ворог атакував Київщину балістикою
У Бориспільському районі загинула людина, ще пʼятеро - поранені.
Пошкоджено складське приміщення, стоянку, автомобілі та АЗС.
✅ Ми у Telegram | Viber
Президент Бразилії запропонував Трампу скликати Радбез ООН щодо війни в Україні
«Ми погодилися щодо нагальності пошуку переговорного рішення для російсько-українського конфлікту, який триває вже майже п'ять років»,– заявив Лула Да Сілва.
✅ Ми у Telegram | Viber
Розподільчий центр «Аврори» постраждав внаслідок сьогоднішньої атаки рф
На момент атаки усі співробітники перебували в укритті, повідомляє пресслужба компанії.
✅ Ми у Telegram | Viber
🇺🇦 Куди б не вела дорога цими днями – нехай вона починається з хорошого.
На ОККО до Дня Незалежності (22-24 серпня) діє святковий Fishback:
⛽️ 5 грн/л за заправку бензину або ДП
⛽️ 2 грн/л за ГАЗ
А якщо обираєте PULLS, то ще й підтримуєте Дронопад від «Повернись живим», щоб ворожих дронів у нашому небі ставало менше 💥
Вночі росіяни вдарили балістикою по залізничному підприємству в Києві, загинув працівник
Також під російською атакою опинилася станція Роздільна на Одещині. Там пошкоджений вокзал.
На фото вокзал на станції Роздільна
✅ Ми у Telegram | Viber
У Кривому Розі вже 16 загиблих внаслідок удару рф, 9 людей вважаються зниклими безвісти, серед них – 2 дітей
130 людей отримали поранення, зокрема 25 дітей.
✅ Ми у Telegram | Viber
У Львові чоловік смертельно поранив ножем військовослужбовця ТЦК
55-річний військовий помер у кареті швидкої, повідомили у поліції Львівщини.
Поліцейський, який був у складі групи оповіщення, двічі вистрілив у бік нападника, щоб відвернути загрозу. Чоловік дістав поранення ноги.
✅ Ми у Telegram | Viber
Прийшла черга OZON розплачуватись за війну путіна в Україні
Палають склади маркетплейса у Чапаєвську, Самарська область рф.
Також дрони уразили Новокуйбишевський НПЗ.
✅ Ми у Telegram | Viber
Головні новини за 21 серпня
▪️У Кривому Розі рф атакували торговельний центр: вже 145 постраждалих
▪️рф вдарили по Миколаївщині: загинули четверо людей, серед них - троє дітей
▪️Українські дрони пошкодили ще одне велике НПЗ та інші дипстрайки від українських безпілотників в рф
▪️З'явився вітчизняний реактивний перехоплювач безпілотників
✅ Ми у | Telegram | Viber
Кривий Ріг: на жаль вже 15 загиблих.
Двоє з них померли у лікарні...
Постраждалих вже 130 (серед них 23 дітей).
29 з них у важкому стані, серед них 5 дітей, – повідомив голова оборони міста Олександр Вілкул.
✅ Ми у | Telegram | Viber
Українські прикордонники не перевіряють «Резерв+» або військово-облікові документи у жінок під час виїзду з України.
Речник ДПСУ наголосив, що нині не було якихось змін у правилах перетину кордону для жінок.
В окремих країнах Євросоюзу заявили, що від українок вимагали дані із застосунку "Резерв+" під час оформлення тимчасового захисту. У МЗС наголосили, що такі вимоги пов'язані із новими правилами отримання тимчас…
👍319🤡85😁36❤30👎21🙏7🤬6
Showing the 12 most recent of 321 posts we hold for @UkraineNow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 9,727 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 65 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Верховна Рада України @verkhovnaradaukrainy · 98,087 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
IT ARMY of Ukraine @itarmyofukraine2022 · 106,630 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
BRAMA @brama_channel · 112,066 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
МВС України @mvs_ukraine · 67,325 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
Офіс Президента @OP_UA · 79,479 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Держспецзв’язку @dsszzi_official · 59,775 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Дія @diia_gov · 130,110 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Vitalii KIM | Official @VitaliiKimOfficial · 288,507 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Служба безпеки України @SBUkr · 299,130 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
КМДА – офіційний канал @KyivCityOfficial · 400,267 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
UNITED24Media @United24media · 68,135 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Суспільне Львів @suspilnelviv · 71,707 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
🇺🇦 Київська обласна військова адміністрація @kyivoda · 85,696 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Укренерго @Ukrenergo · 99,860 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Новинач @novinach · 139,492 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
Віталій Кличко @vitaliy_klitschko · 190,499 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
СУСПІЛЬНЕ НОВИНИ @suspilnenews · 263,058 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Zelenskiy / Official @v_zelenskiy_official · 676,081 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Укрзалізниця @UkrzalInfo · 235,883 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Украина в шоке @ukrainavshoke_repost · 76,281 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Andro News @andronews_official · 84,192 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine @kpszsu · 897,434 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
hromadske @hromadske_ua · 101,836 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Повістки Київ / Повестки Киев / Погода Киев @kyiv_povistka · 244,359 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 251 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
4 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Kyiv Oblast(en.wikipedia.org) “…2022 }}, [[aljazeera.com]] (3 April 2022){{Cite web|url=https://t.me/UkraineNow/8291|title=Ukraine NOW|access-date=April 2, 2022|archive-date=April…” read 16 August 2026
Ленні Кравіц(uk.wikipedia.org) “…Ukraine», що збирає кошти на підтримку українців.{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/UkraineNow/9188 |title=Ukraine NOW |website=Telegram…” read 16 August 2026
Таран Юрій Олександрович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…загальнонаціональну хвилину мовчання{{Cite web|title=Ukraine NOW|url=https://t.me/UkraineNow/15323|website=Telegram|accessdate=2022-08-25}}, започатковану…” read 16 August 2026
Херсонська обласна лікарня(uk.wikipedia.org) “…не постраждав і не загинув.{{Cite web|title=Ukraine NOW|url=https://t.me/UkraineNow/24283|website=Telegram|accessdate=2023-10-06}}
23 грудня…” read 16 August 2026
Hacker News
This handle was named 2 times in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ukraine NOW” (@UkraineNow), 416,272 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UkraineNow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.