🔥Вночі дрони завітали до Москви та області. Попередньо, палають склади на території логістичного технопарку "Соф'їно" та НПЗ у столиці, — ЗМІ Гучно було також у Воронежі та Рязані. 🔗 Сайт | Facebook | YouTube | ТikТok
🔥523👍94❤40🙏11😐5👏3👎1

Channel
@tch_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
737,756subscribers
-6,581 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001305722586 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tch_channel |
| Description | Офіційний канал TSN.ua Комерційна співпраця: @y_ponoma |
| Created | 16 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tch_channel |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 737,756 | -172 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 737,928 | -380 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 738,308 | +13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 738,295 | -417 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 738,712 | -490 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 739,202 | -353 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 739,555 | -274 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:48 | 739,829 | -170 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:04 | 739,999 | -220 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 740,219 | -162 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 740,381 | -152 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 740,533 | -77 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 740,610 | -96 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 740,706 | -120 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 740,826 | -151 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 740,977 | -290 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 741,267 | -536 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 741,803 | -263 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 742,066 | -169 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 742,235 | first reading |
1,139 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,139 (5 August 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 61,223,590 |
| Reactions total | 906,244 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 05:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 388 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /2265866 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC | 117 minutes – 17 minutes old | 15,600 views ~331 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /2265856 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC | 27 minutes – 38 minutes old | 31,200 views ~708 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 16 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2265846 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC | 33 minutes – 63 minutes old | 43,700 views ~353 reactions | 60 minutes: 43,700still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 24 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2265836 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC | 320 minutes – 80 minutes old | 51,000 views ~747 reactions | 60 minutes: 42,733 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 29 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2265786 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC | 341 minutes – 1.7 hours old | 58,300 views ~545 reactions | 60 minutes: 43,818 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 41 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2265776 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC | 374 minutes – 2.2 hours old | 63,600 views ~760 reactions | no checkpoint reading yetstill climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 74 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2265756 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC | 31.8 hours – 2.8 hours old | 75,000 views ~726 reactions | no checkpoint reading yetstill climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.8 hoursupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2265736 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC | 32.3 hours – 3.3 hours old | 78,200 views ~445 reactions | 3.0 hours: 76,005 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.3 hoursupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
1,187,850 reactions across 997 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 264,976 | 22.3% | |
| 🙏 | 201,737 | 17.0% | |
| ❤ | 200,192 | 16.9% | |
| 🤯 | 172,316 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 87,104 | 7.33% | |
| 🔥 | 77,224 | 6.50% | |
| 😁 | 76,778 | 6.46% | |
| 👎 | 40,228 | 3.39% | |
| 😱 | 21,587 | 1.82% | |
| 💔 | 15,739 | 1.32% | |
| 💯 | 12,770 | 1.08% | |
| 😐 | 12,474 | 1.05% | |
| 👏 | 2,365 | 0.199% | |
| 🤩 | 2,360 | 0.199% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 997 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,187,850 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tch_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🔥Вночі дрони завітали до Москви та області. Попередньо, палають склади на території логістичного технопарку "Соф'їно" та НПЗ у столиці, — ЗМІ Гучно було також у Воронежі та Рязані. 🔗 Сайт | Facebook | YouTube | ТikТok
🔥523👍94❤40🙏11😐5👏3👎1
🟡 Київ — дронова небезпека! 🔗 Сайт | Facebook | YouTube | ТikТok
🙏213❤23🤯17😢17👎1
🟡 УВАГА! У Києві оголошена дронова небезпека! Просимо всіх терміново прослідувати в укриття цивільного захисту! Мапа укриттів - https://kyivcity.gov.ua/news/shelters_map/ ⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🔗 Сайт | Facebook | YouTube | ТikТok
🙏427❤82🤯58😱25👎7💯3😁3🤩1
🔴Київ - ракетна небезпека! Загроза балістики з Воронежа 🔗 Сайт | Facebook | YouTube | ТikТok
🙏634🤯104❤45😢44👎17😱12👏8🔥8
⚠️Шахраї розсилають фальшиві рахунки за електроенергію від імені Міненерго. У таких повідомленнях є посилання на фішингові сайти. Перейшовши за ними, людину можуть попросити ввести персональні чи банківські дані або завантажити шкідливий файл. У такий спосіб зловмисники можуть отримати доступ до акаунтів і банківських рахунків або заразити пристрій. Не переходьте за підозрілими посиланнями та не вводьте свої дані н…
🤯434❤95😱32💯18👎14🙏12👍11😁11
😥💔 Жінка завела двох малюків до будинку, щоб укласти їх спати і саме в цей момент пролунав вибух. У селищі Глеваха Фастівського району пошкоджено двоповерховий житловий будинок. Загинули двоє дітей 2023 року народження — хлопчик та дівчинка і 39-річна жінка, мати хлопчика. За попередніми даними, ввечері біля будинку перебували три родини з дітьми. Жінка завела двох малюків до будинку, щоб укласти їх спати. Саме в ц…
😢2,100💔343❤177🙏91😱43🤯35👎8🤩2
😰 Від ТЦ «Новий Континент» у Дніпрі не залишилось майже нічого. 🔗 Сайт | Facebook | YouTube | ТikТok
😢1,580🤯248🙏112❤50👎12👏12💯6😁4
🔥Сили оборони засобами Fire Point вибили близько 10% російської нафтопереробки лише за першу половину вересня. Протягом двох тижнів було атаковано низку нафтопереробних заводів на території Росії, зокрема: Рязанський НПЗ, Саратовський НПЗ, завод у Слов’янську-на-Кубані, Нижньокамський та Сизранський НПЗ. 🔗 Сайт | Facebook | YouTube | ТikТok
🔥1,190👍253❤116😁33🙏33👎18😐6💯3
💔 Мама та двоє маленьких дітей загинули у Фастівському районі внаслідок атаки РФ, — ОВА. Також у Фастівському районі внаслідок атаки пошкоджено приватні житлові будинки та автомобіль. В одному з будинків виникла пожежа, її ліквідували. Щирі співчуття рідним і близьким загиблих 🕯️ 🔗 Сайт | Facebook | YouTube | ТikТok
😢2,900💔456🙏184❤87🤯40👎12👍4
❗️РФ переносить виробництво «шахедів» під землю, — Dnipro Osint. Особлива економічна зона «Алабуга» будує підземні цехи для виробництва «шахедів». Вже побудовано близько 42 000 м² підземного простору під майбутні виробничі потужності. Моніторинговий канал наголошує, що з часом вся екосистема російських «гераней» стає дедалі складнішою та дорожчою для ураження: виробництво ховають під землю, інфраструктуру розосеред…
🤯1,330👎240❤138😢62🔥56😱44👍29😐25
⚠️Загроза БпЛА: повітряна тривога оголошена у Києві та низці областей. 🔗 Сайт | Facebook | YouTube | ТikТok
🙏288🤯47❤26😢13😱6👎4😁2👍1
💥Маємо вже друге успішне застосування нового українського дрона-перехоплювача за сьогодні, — Зеленський. Бійці військової контррозвідки СБУ уразили російський реактивний дрон «Герань-5». 🔗 Сайт | Facebook | YouTube | ТikТok
❤511👍202🙏124😁22👎17🤩6🔥3😐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,139 posts we hold for @tch_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 552 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
6 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | TSN |
|---|---|
| Description | news division of the Ukrainian television network 1+1 |
| X / Twitter | @tsnua |
| YouTube | UCXoJ8kY9zpLBEz-8saaT3ew |
| Official site | https://tsn.ua |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТСН новини / ТСН.ua” (@tch_channel), 737,756 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tch_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.