Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Могилів-Подільська міська рада

Channel

Могилів-Подільська міська рада

@Mog_Pod_MR

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,333subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526680620
TypeChannel
Username@Mog_Pod_MR
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mog_Pod_MR

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,27111,33311,3027 August 2026 — 11,296 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,294 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,288 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,291 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,286 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,278 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,273 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,272 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,275 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,271 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,278 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,279 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,288 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,286 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,283 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,284 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,280 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,278 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,279 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,284 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,300 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,303 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,301 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,306 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,303 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,313 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,333 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 39 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,262–11,342 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 23:3711,333+20
14 Sept 2026, 03:5811,313+10
12 Sept 2026, 09:1511,303-3
10 Sept 2026, 03:0011,306+5
6 Sept 2026, 18:1811,301-2
4 Sept 2026, 09:4011,303+3
2 Sept 2026, 20:2611,300+16
1 Sept 2026, 17:1711,284+5
31 Aug 2026, 17:4311,279+1
30 Aug 2026, 20:1411,278-2
29 Aug 2026, 16:4411,280-4
28 Aug 2026, 16:4711,284+1
26 Aug 2026, 20:4411,283-3
25 Aug 2026, 19:1211,286-2
24 Aug 2026, 21:3911,288+9
23 Aug 2026, 05:1711,279+1
20 Aug 2026, 16:4311,278+7
18 Aug 2026, 13:3511,271-4
17 Aug 2026, 12:2811,275+3
16 Aug 2026, 02:1711,272first reading

Engagement

213 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 11,333 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,300
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.756%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
122
of 213 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held213 (6 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total280,501
Reactions total2,121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54m 26s
Average length
3m 53s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,667 reactions across 210 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢1,60543.8%
1,45839.8%
👍44812.2%
😱671.83%
👎501.36%
🔥310.845%
🤩70.191%
🫡10.027%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 211 of the 213 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,667 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 213 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 22:50 UTC254 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟢 ВІДБІЙ ТРИВОГИ 🔇 🟢 ✅ Все спокійно 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

2👍1

2 Sept 2026, 22:24 UTC511 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 ❗ 🔊 ПОВІТРЯНА ТРИВОГА ❗ ⚠️ Прохання перейти до укриття або у безпечне місце 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥

😢41

2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC989 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟢 ВІДБІЙ ТРИВОГИ 🔇 🟢 ✅ Все спокійно 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

7🫡1

2 Sept 2026, 18:31 UTC≈2,550 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 ❗ 🔊 ПОВІТРЯНА ТРИВОГА ❗ ⚠️ Прохання перейти до укриття або у безпечне місце 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥

😢121

2 Sept 2026, 16:57 UTC≈3,120 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Koord_shtabPhoto

‼️ УВАГА! Шахраї вкотре намагаються нажитися на родинах військовополонених та зниклих безвісти ▶ Фіксується сплеск активності аферистів, які маніпулюють емоційним станом сімей українських захисників. Зловмисники телефонують або пишуть у різноманітних соцмережах з фейкових профілів: стверджують, що володіють «списками на обмін», і вимагають від 2 000 доларів у родин за нібито «гарантоване включення» оборонця до пере

5👍2

2 Sept 2026, 14:19 UTC≈3,020 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Вчора в Серебрії мав честь особисто познайомитися з нашим ветераном Ігорем Михайловим. До цього ми тримали зв'язок лише через його маму, пані Ліну. Про бойовий шлях Ігоря та його брата Вадима я знав давно, адже підтримували їхні підрозділи. Згодом почув про важке поранення Ігоря. Зараз наш герой відновлюється і приїхав побути з рідними. Попереду протезування та реабілітація. Але його незламна сила і оптимізму вража

35👍12

2 Sept 2026, 13:41 UTC≈2,830 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‼️Укрзалізниця - Ukrzaliznytsia інформує‼️ При евакуації з поїзда відійдіть на 200 метрів від поїзда та перону! 🔹Ця відстань може вберегти від ураження уламками та вибухової хвилі. 🔹Не залишайтеся на платформі та не скупчуйтеся біля залізничної інфраструктури. 🔹Негайно прямуйте до найближчого укриття або іншого безпечного місця. 🤍 Укрзалізниця нагадує, що залізнична інфраструктура та рухомий склад є об’єктами підвищ

10

2 Sept 2026, 12:49 UTC≈2,720 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @UkraineNowPhoto

Наслідки прильоту по корпусу Національного університету харчових технологій у Києві, – МОН ✅ Ми у Telegram | Viber

😢193😱3

2 Sept 2026, 12:49 UTC≈2,640 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @UkraineNow

російські «шахеди» вдарили по одному з університетів в Києві – прямо у час занять, - Зеленський Всі 160 студентів були в укритті. ✅ Ми у Telegram | Viber

😱8

2 Sept 2026, 06:20 UTC≈2,900 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Задекларована праця захищає бізнес під час воєнного стану

👎8

2 Sept 2026, 06:01 UTC≈2,960 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @kpszsuPhoto

⚡️ ЗБИТО/ПОДАВЛЕНО 141 ЦІЛЬ ПРОТИВНИКА ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ У ніч на 2 вересня (з 18:00 1 вересня) противник атакував: - 2 балістичними ракетами Іскандер-М з ТОТ АМ Крим; - 2 керованими авіаційними ракетами Х-59/69 із повітряного простору над акваторією Чорного моря; - 174 ударними БпЛА типу Shahed (близько половини - реактивні), S8000 "Бандероль", Гербера та дронами-імітаторами типу “Пародія” із напрямків: Орел, ТОТ Донецьк,

👍52

2 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC≈2,840 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🕘 Загальнонаціональна хвилина мовчання 🕯 Вшановуємо пам’ять про усіх, хто загинув через російську агресію

😢243

Showing the 12 most recent of 213 posts we hold for @Mog_Pod_MR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Реальна Вінниця 🇺🇦
@vinnytsiarealll · 293,703
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Могилів-Подільська міська рада” (@Mog_Pod_MR), 11,333 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mog_Pod_MR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.