Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for военкор Хохлов ✌🏻

Channel

военкор Хохлов ✌🏻

@Voenkor_Hohlov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,990subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001853971599
TypeChannel
Username@Voenkor_Hohlov
Created6 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Voenkor_Hohlov

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,98414,03414,0096 August 2026 — 14,011 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,016 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,011 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,010 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,011 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,012 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,010 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,015 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,012 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,017 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,028 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,032 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,034 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,031 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,024 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,019 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,018 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,017 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,016 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,024 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,017 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,016 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,012 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,018 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,007 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,002 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,006 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,994 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,988 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,984 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,994 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,993 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,990 subscribers13,9906 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,977–14,042 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:3713,990-3
16 Sept 2026, 21:0113,993-1
14 Sept 2026, 21:1813,994+10
11 Sept 2026, 11:2013,984-4
8 Sept 2026, 20:1913,988-6
5 Sept 2026, 12:3613,994-12
3 Sept 2026, 16:2014,006+4
2 Sept 2026, 06:2814,002-5
1 Sept 2026, 08:5614,007-11
31 Aug 2026, 06:3414,018+6
30 Aug 2026, 05:2814,012-4
29 Aug 2026, 05:3414,016-1
28 Aug 2026, 03:0414,017-7
26 Aug 2026, 23:3314,024+8
25 Aug 2026, 20:5714,016-1
24 Aug 2026, 22:3514,017-1
23 Aug 2026, 06:1514,018-1
21 Aug 2026, 16:3914,019-5
20 Aug 2026, 15:0614,024-7
19 Aug 2026, 15:2814,031first reading

Engagement

150 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.1%
avg views ÷ 13,990 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,030
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 150 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held150 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total217,257
Reactions total10,460
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15m 27s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

46,689 reactions across 150 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁22,69848.6%
🤣6,54514.0%
custom 53098044810540011652,5905.55%
🔥2,0604.41%
❤1,6783.59%
😭1,3272.84%
🤯1,3112.81%
🥰9762.09%
😎7541.61%
🤩6811.46%
🫡6731.44%
🤬6571.41%
😨6101.31%
💯5691.22%
👍5411.16%
🌚3940.844%
🏆3820.818%
🍾3620.775%
😈3310.709%
🎉2420.518%
21 further kinds1,3082.80%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 150 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46,689 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 150 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Voenkor_Hohlov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 150 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.00%
3 of 150 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
5,030
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,530
over 147 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:14 UTC957 views70 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

😁53custom 530980448105400116516🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 15:04 UTC≈3,080 views246 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Летели с мужиками по Сахалину и тут Сереге захотелось поссать. 🤭 Припарковали вертушечку братану 🤙

😁194❤19🔥13🤣11😎6👍3

2 Sept 2026, 14:16 UTC≈3,360 views220 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁143🤣49😎12😭10🌚4❤1😈1

2 Sept 2026, 10:29 UTC≈3,790 views222 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁166🤣35❤11custom 530980448105400116510

2 Sept 2026, 09:59 UTC≈5,960 views146 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Кого вы поддерживаете?

  1. Омское ГРУ44%
  2. Служба Безопасности Урала39%
  3. Единая Россия39%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 5309804481054001165102😁40🔥4

2 Sept 2026, 08:38 UTC≈6,340 views320 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Сегодня вашего военкора чуть не поймали во время секретной спецоперации Омского ГРУ в столице противника. Благо между прибывшими вражескими спецслужбами начался конфликт, перешедший в перестрелку, за право задержать столь значимую личность. Благодаря всей этой суматохе мне удалось незаметно скрыться и безопасно отойти в российский тыл на перегруппировку.

😁233custom 530980448105400116562❤13🌚7👍3🤡2

1 Sept 2026, 23:05 UTC≈4,870 views361 reactionsread 2 September 2026

не буду ничего постить что б самому пизды не получить

😁321🤝21🤔7custom 53098044810540011656🙊5❤‍🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 18:00 UTC≈7,150 views369 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Усилить лупашево! — Зеленский

🔥224😁107🫡16❤8👍4🤡4🤬4💯2

1 Sept 2026, 08:14 UTC≈5,210 views342 reactionsread 2 September 2026

👆«Чтобы весь мир говорил "жи ест брат", изучайте устройство автомата Калашникова» - Военкор Хохлов российским школьникам

💯221🤣85👀11😁11🤝7❤3💘3👍1

31 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈5,750 views435 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🤷‍♂️Все еще хотите вернуть МакДональдс?

🤣307⚡106👍8😈5❤3❤‍🔥2🤯2😁1

31 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈5,430 views323 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Это я, стою грустный, потому что в очередной раз не получилось записать репортаж про экипаж Панциря🙁

😭218🤣82🌚14custom 53098044810540011657😁2

30 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈5,330 views248 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Видео штурма Малой Токмачки от иностранных наёмников противника👆

😁187😨44🤬5❤4🫡4😭4

Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @Voenkor_Hohlov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 09:59 UTCAnonymous Poll1,630 voters approx.

Кого вы поддерживаете?

  1. Омское ГРУ44%
  2. Служба Безопасности Урала39%
  3. Единая Россия39%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTCAnonymous Poll2,700 voters approx.

А вы верите, что атаки на склады Озон и ВБ — это их внутренний конфликт?

  1. Да, это внутренний конфликт.64%
  2. Нет, это всё хохлы.11%
  3. Единая Россия.25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTCAnonymous Poll2,930 voters approx.

Ваши планы на сентябрь

  1. Голосовать за Единую Россию52%
  2. Отправится на СВО в отряде штром Z48%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Танки. История и современность. Btvt.info
@btvt2019 · 24,083
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 September 2026
Ukraine context | UC
@ukraine_context · 93,328
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
СРИА Новости
@sria_news · 41,697
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
ЦЕБУЛЯ БОРУКВА 🤙🧅
@borykva · 21,899
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 22 September 2026
Русский Добровольческий Корпус
@rvc_army · 114,183
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Український Наступ | #УкрТг ∆
@ukrnastup · 136,116
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
НІП «Тиск»
@TyskNIP · 29,226
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Державне Бюро Мемів
@dbmua · 36,534
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 1 September 2026
ДОХЛІ РАСІЯНЄ ✙
@dokhlyye_rossiyane · 105,404
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
Соціально-Побутовий Журнал «Водограй»
@mag_vodogray · 25,736
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 September 2026
Vox Veritatis_Голос правди
@vox_veritatis · 23,890
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 September 2026
постіронічні політичні меми
@postironicpol · 58,186
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
Легіон Диванної Розвідки 🇺🇦🔱
@couch_iu · 31,419
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
✙ Ви хочете як в Україні?
@DailyUkrainianNews · 26,211
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 September 2026
Dnipro Osint ⟨ Гарбуз ⟩
@DniproOfficial · 34,270
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
КіберБорошно | CyberBoroshno
@kiber_boroshno · 67,746
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
DroneBomber✙
@dronebomber · 59,379
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Третя світова🪫
@third_svitova · 21,781
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 September 2026
Око Гора ✙ Новости и аналитика
@oko_gora · 67,839
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Розвідка Ноєм
@rozvidka_noem · 112,353
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“военкор Хохлов ✌🏻” (@Voenkor_Hohlov), 13,990 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Voenkor_Hohlov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.