🇷🇺 Новости
🇷🇺 Канал военнослужащих ВДВ
🇷🇺 Доверие от народа
🇷🇺 Эксклюзивный контент
РКН - № 7829855991
Мы в MAX - max.ru/arx_spn
Реклама - @Letasgo
Магазин с атрибутикой - @arx_atributika
Наш сайт - archangelspetsnaza.ru
Created
11 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 45 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,017 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -11,287. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,017,431–1,041,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 07:38
1,020,241
-4,369
16 Sept 2026, 18:21
1,024,610
-1,054
14 Sept 2026, 18:21
1,025,664
-760
13 Sept 2026, 04:18
1,026,424
-1,137
11 Sept 2026, 06:21
1,027,561
+3,968
8 Sept 2026, 12:58
1,023,593
-1,908
5 Sept 2026, 09:57
1,025,501
+5,266
3 Sept 2026, 12:16
1,020,235
-6,446
2 Sept 2026, 04:13
1,026,681
+324
1 Sept 2026, 03:14
1,026,357
-12,477
31 Aug 2026, 02:25
1,038,834
+12,562
30 Aug 2026, 03:46
1,026,272
-819
29 Aug 2026, 05:41
1,027,091
-1,461
28 Aug 2026, 03:14
1,028,552
-612
27 Aug 2026, 02:32
1,029,164
-746
26 Aug 2026, 01:16
1,029,910
-835
25 Aug 2026, 03:48
1,030,745
+9,667
23 Aug 2026, 21:33
1,021,078
-2,321
22 Aug 2026, 07:57
1,023,399
-871
20 Aug 2026, 23:37
1,024,270
first reading
Engagement
1,570 posts held, back to 5 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 171 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.29%
avg views ÷ 1,020,241 subscribers
Avg views / post
64,200
331 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
331
of 1,570 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 331 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
1,570 (5 April 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
21,237,670
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 07:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,400
Videos
≈8,090
Links
≈15,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 51m
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 197 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 45 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 23 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 4.0 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 24.4% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 62.0% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 54,700 views — 5.27% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 90,570).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 43,000 → 3.0 hours: 54,100 → 6.0 hours: 61,800still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
28 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,169
across the posts below
Posts paid on
71
of 999 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
166
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arx_spn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 June 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.2%
2 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
63,100
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
75,900
over 997 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5w64MCn
2
13 August 2026
18 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 June 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
✍️ Налет на Самару
Несмотря на якобы требование Трампа к Зеленскому остановить удары по НПЗ в России, украинские формирования продолжают атаки на российские тылы.
В прошедшие сутки интенсивность ударов осталась такой же низкой, но при этом по несколько дронов долетало до глубокого тыла. Вчера под утро – в Уфу.
Сегодня ночью – до Самарской области. Там под удар украинских беспилотников попал Куйбышевский НПЗ, где в…
Проверенные новости от ведущего с Первого канала, Руслана Осташко
Читать в Телеграм: https://t.me/OstashkoNews
Подписаться в Максе: https://max.ru/OstashkoNews
😎 А мы уже тут
Устроили очередную засаду на транспорт врага в его же туннеле. Лёгкого заезда на позиции не будет.
🤙Архангел Спецназа!
❗️🤙Если не грузит видео - смотрите у нас в MAX
🤙 ХУДИ «АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА»
*Лимитированная серия.
Сила, храбрость и защита в одном образе.
Мужская утепленная толстовка худи в глубоком оливковом цвете с капюшоном из высококачественного хлопкового футера с начесом.
Худи демисезонное, а значит можно носить осенью, зимой и весной. Утеплитель — флис.
Рекомендации по уходу за изделием: Ткань до стирки может оставлять остатки начеса на других вещах! Излишки ворса удал…
💬Удары по 404💬
куда били ВС РФ за сутки
✍️ Украина продолжает гореть в огне ударов российских войск. Сейчас основную ударную силу составляют реактивные «Герани» и легкие крылатые ракеты «Дань-М» и «Бандероль».
▪️В прошедшие сутки было несколько значимых ударов.
В Киевской области поражены склады BDU Logistics в Счастливом, а в Боярке нанесен удар по газораспределительной станции. Также ночью атакована СТО в Буче.
…
На фронте всё решают факты. В политике их тоже полезно отделять от докладов, заявлений и красивых формулировок.
В «Выпускайте Кракена!» разбирают СВО, решения власти, миграционный бардак и международную политику. Не пересказывают сводки, а объясняют, кому всё это выгодно и к чему ведёт.
Пишут прямо, с фактами и без дежурной дипломатии.
Хороший канал для тех, кому важно видеть всю картину, а не только очередной заг…
😎 Минус «Вампир»
Своевременно заметили и отправили FPV дрон для уничтожения вражеского тяжёлого гексакоптера.
🤙Архангел Спецназа!
❗️🤙Если не грузит видео - смотрите у нас в MAX
Занимаемся разработкой и производством высококачественных антенн для НСУ, FPV, РЭР и РЭБ, а также МШУ, линейных усилителей, фильтров и прочих элементов связи, принципиально увеличивающих дальность полета.
https://t.me/svyaz987
Контакты в описании канала.
💬Проект Rapstone💬
как британцы оснащаются дронами
Великобритания начала реализацию программы по насыщению сухопутных войск БпЛА разведки и целеуказания, о чем сообщил министр по вопросам оборонной готовности и промышленности Люк Поллард.
На оборонной выставке он рассказал о первых контрактах общей стоимостью 16 млн фунтов стерлингов ($21 млн). Сумма небольшая, но в этом и смысл, что британцы делают ставку на более …
📲ДЕТЕКТОР, КОТОРЫЙ СПАСЕТ ВАМ ЖИЗНЬ
⠀
💎Авторы канала «Два майора» и Кирилл Федоров провели полевые испытания детекторов БПЛА, сравнили их работу в реальных условиях и выбрали для себя «НАБАТ-3» — как средство защиты для себя и своих людей.
⠀
📡Детектор работает в диапазоне от 200 до 8800 МГц и способен не только обнаруживать сигнал дрона, но и перехватывать аналоговый видеосигнал на дистанции до 30 километров (при исп…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,570 posts we hold for @arx_spn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@arx_spn edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 177 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 151 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Енот из Херсона 🦝 @HersonEnot · 41,521 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
98 гвардейская ВДД @vdd98 · 24,001 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
ВДВ Псков ZOV @vdvpskovz · 25,627 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
Arm.Taktik27 @Arm_taktik27 · 33,893 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
ВЕСЪ.РФ @vesv_rf · 38,529 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Реалист Реальный @RealistRealni · 23,104 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
Чёрные гусары @blackhussars · 27,685 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
Русская Весна Z : спецоперация на Украине и Донбассе @rusvesnasu · 131,111 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
RUSVARG @rusvarg · 38,843 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
Бригада "Север-V" ДК ВС РФ @Sever_Z · 40,178 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
Лыня🇷🇺 @Lunay14 · 22,445 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
Опасный Бизнес @OpasniyBiznes · 97,051 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 September 2026
Русский Дом 🇷🇺 @russkiy_dommm · 32,743 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
Ведомство @vedomstvo_rf · 29,940 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 September 2026
Трупы ВСУ | Хохлы 200 | Ищи хохлов @vsy200 · 30,292 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
ZАЧИСТКА @zachistka_ua · 41,163 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Твои Герои, Саратов! ZOV @ZovSAG164 · 21,958 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 September 2026
Лина Булатникова🤍 Помощь фронту💙Дроны "Мурз"❤️Стримы @reihatori · 24,417 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
Рядовой на передовой @frontline_pvt · 30,466 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
Народная милиция ДНР @nm_dnr · 47,812 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Донецкий стрингер (Бородатый документалист) @stringer_donetsk · 22,767 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Кирилл Фёдоров Видео 🇷🇺 @fyodorovkirill · 23,970 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
Артёмовск @rus_bakhmut · 28,704 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Рустам Ковальски и Kowalski team @kowalski_team · 23,447 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 307 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
17 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА” (@arx_spn), 1,020,241 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arx_spn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.