Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 148,744–149,293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 02:18
148,807
-16
15 Sept 2026, 21:19
148,823
-24
14 Sept 2026, 03:39
148,847
-20
12 Sept 2026, 12:59
148,867
-78
10 Sept 2026, 07:35
148,945
+25
7 Sept 2026, 01:58
148,920
+22
4 Sept 2026, 09:41
148,898
-42
2 Sept 2026, 19:54
148,940
-13
1 Sept 2026, 15:48
148,953
-25
31 Aug 2026, 17:55
148,978
-15
30 Aug 2026, 17:34
148,993
-46
29 Aug 2026, 14:13
149,039
+14
28 Aug 2026, 15:08
149,025
+16
27 Aug 2026, 15:03
149,009
+69
26 Aug 2026, 18:32
148,940
-16
25 Aug 2026, 20:18
148,956
-36
24 Aug 2026, 22:47
148,992
-49
23 Aug 2026, 12:57
149,041
-46
22 Aug 2026, 01:57
149,087
-45
20 Aug 2026, 19:12
149,132
first reading
Engagement
719 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 148,807 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,700
407 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
407
of 719 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
719 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
8,023,340
Reactions total
379,053
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 09:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,300
Videos
≈5,510
Links
≈13,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 43m
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 140 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
659,468 reactions across 702 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
267,618
40.6%
💯
147,489
22.4%
👍
82,398
12.5%
🔥
60,381
9.16%
🤮
38,541
5.84%
❤
19,288
2.92%
🤯
18,333
2.78%
🙏
12,877
1.95%
😱
7,893
1.20%
😢
3,133
0.475%
👎
1,410
0.214%
😍
107
0.016%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 719 of the 719 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 673,377 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 719 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
283
across the posts below
Posts paid on
75
of 719 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
114
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @golosmordora1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 719 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.139%
1 of 719 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
16,500
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
19,900
over 718 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqw25xb5
1
1 September 2026
1 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 719 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Мне кажется, что сейчас Россия дает Украине последний шанс сохраниться хоть в каком-то виде — тем, что разрушает последние иллюзии, что войну громадяне смогут терпеть еще очень и очень долго, существуя в более-менее нормальном состоянии своего быта
Как это было несколько лет до этого, когда вроде бы и война, но в супермаркетах полки ломятся от продуктов, работают клубы и рестораны, функционирует какая-то промышленно…
Ну, что - наши поздравления и ожидания. Сегодня, 26 сентября, стартовала Московская неделя моды. В мероприятии примут участие свыше 350 дизайнеров из 24 регионов и более чем 10 стран. С первого дня тяжелейшая работа для всех: стартовая программа растянулась почти на десять часов: от первых студенческих показов после обеда до финального выхода Ianis Chamalidy в девять вечера.
После поражения очередных датацентров в Киеве перестали работать ТВ‐каналы, в том числе и министерства обороны, а также тот, где идёт телемарафон. Кроме того во всём городе перебои с интернетом и мобильной связью.
Тревожно. Как же теперь громадянин узнает об очередной перемоге?
Перевернутый знак V (когда рука повернута ладонью к себе, то есть показывается тыльная сторона пальцев) в Великобритании, Ирландии, Австралии и Новой Зеландии воспринимается как грубое оскорбление, аналогичное среднему пальцу (фактически означающее «отвали» или «пошел ты»).
Но есть еще одно значение этого жеста: считается, что сложенные таким образом пальцы способны отражать негативную энергию, сглаз и порчу. В этом…
А антивоенные протесты школьников и студентов в Германии на днях были более, чем серьёзные. Очень массово было и по всей стране. Были даже плакаты "Россия нам не враг". Это для Мерца и правящих элит ФРГ звоночек куда более серьёзный, чем региональные победы АдГ.
Евросоюз предупреждает о ценовом кризисе в энергетике и призывает страны сократить потребление, сказано в письме еврокомиссара по энергетике Дана Йоргенсена.
Похоже, что Европа не особо стремится выделять Украине даже те деньги, которые уже пообещала. И дело не в том, что там не хотят продолжать войну с Россией, или как-то внезапно рассмотрели, что за персонажи сидят в Киеве — просто нет денег. И взять их можно только в долг, но и это становится проблемой.
Поэтому хитрожопые европейцы поступили очень иезуитски — они сказали, что денег Украине дадут, но при условии, что та…
Премьер-министр Кристен Михал заявил в парламенте, что у Эстонии нет планов проводить мобилизацию с целью нападения на Россию.
Уф, отпустило. Спасибо.
😁1,110🤯25👍5❤3👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 719 posts we hold for @golosmordora1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@golosmordora1 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 74 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@golosmordora1 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@newsfrontnotes named in 25 posts, 12 August 2026 – 24 September 2026
@sputnikgeorgia named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Папочка канцлера @kanzlerdaddy · 72,253 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
FYTW @fuckyouthatswhy · 24,146 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
Хрюн Моржов @hrunmorgov · 29,685 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
КОРНИЛОВ @kornilov1968 · 118,975 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Новости правда @newsprav_da · 183,260 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
Запрещённая Украина @godeye_ru · 23,718 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
Кухня Роджерса @rogers_kitchen · 50,630 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Радио Стыдоба @Radiostydoba · 93,759 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Пул N3 @dimsmirnov175 · 332,880 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
BALTNEWS @baltnews · 24,488 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
🎭 Политический Юмор 🎭 @Humor_and_Politics · 33,062 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
Лев Щаранский | Официальный канал 🔞 @sharanism · 33,766 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Алексей ПУШКОВ @alexey_pushkov · 41,508 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
Килинкаров Спиридон @KilinkarovSpiridon · 29,262 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
Орда @orda_mordora · 163,622 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
ДТ Д.Куликов-VZ-Т.Сергейцев @dtlive · 67,878 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Во///дь @indeec_1937 · 78,158 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
Объясняю на пальцах @onp2022 · 22,099 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
Оптимистка в штатском 🇷🇺 @optimistkavshtatskom · 39,637 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
САРДАРЯН @sardaryanh · 49,472 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Всевидящее око @oko_ok · 127,999 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
V🇷🇺Рука Кремля🇷🇺Z @thehandofthekremlin · 21,871 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
АНДРЕЙ ВАДЖРА @andreyVajra · 33,290 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
SALOBOY™ @SALOBOY_OFFICIAL · 52,536 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 428 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Голос Мордора” (@golosmordora1), 148,807 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/golosmordora1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
