Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 29 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @dimonundmir — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
62 measurements spanning 92 days, net -2,680. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 204,712–209,479 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 09:48
205,444
+24
5 Nov 2026, 12:51
205,420
-23
4 Nov 2026, 14:31
205,443
+75
3 Nov 2026, 13:38
205,368
-19
2 Nov 2026, 12:17
205,387
+125
1 Nov 2026, 10:36
205,262
-27
31 Oct 2026, 10:50
205,289
-50
30 Oct 2026, 12:29
205,339
-37
29 Oct 2026, 08:55
205,376
-64
28 Oct 2026, 04:59
205,440
-42
27 Oct 2026, 06:01
205,482
-56
26 Oct 2026, 03:56
205,538
-61
25 Oct 2026, 05:11
205,599
-64
24 Oct 2026, 05:40
205,663
-52
23 Oct 2026, 07:44
205,715
-71
22 Oct 2026, 09:26
205,786
-87
21 Oct 2026, 05:58
205,873
-81
20 Oct 2026, 01:48
205,954
-57
19 Oct 2026, 02:46
206,011
-60
17 Oct 2026, 23:57
206,071
first reading
Engagement
594 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 205,444 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,100
194 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
194
of 594 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
594 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
4,666,680
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 15:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,370
Videos
≈2,290
Links
≈10,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
48h 01m
Average length
17m 34s
Measured directly from 164 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 194 posts held from the last 30 days (2.06%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴 Пыточная на Украине существовала несколько лет, и только сейчас это обнародовали конкуренты Буданова* — политолог Дмитрий Евстафьев:
«Я посмотрел на историю вот этой пыточной. <…> А что, про эту пыточную ещё никто не знал? <…> Как появилась в СМИ информация? Ну, чётко же совершенно, что идёт большая разборка между различными украинскими игроками. Разборка направлена на снос экстремиста и террориста, признанно…
«Я же не собирался на это соглашаться!»
Знакомое чувство после сложных переговоров?
Вы приходите на встречу с чёткой позицией. Знаете стоимость своей работы, понимаете сроки, уверены в аргументах.
Но в какой-то момент собеседник произносит:
— У конкурентов дешевле. Можете сделать скидку?
Вы объясняете, почему цена обоснована.
А клиент отвечает:
— Ну вы же понимаете, у нас ограниченный бюджет. Давайте найдём компро…
Как выразился классик, "читатель любит детективы". Но особенно они увлекательный если речь идет о политике. Именно такую мою книгу со скидкой и быстрой доставкой вы можете приобрести здесь https://www.ozon.ru/product/politbyuro-i-sekretariat-tsk-v-1945-1985-gg-lyudi-i-vlast-spitsyn-evgeniy-yurevich-583770065/?at=1oWq1PFZpnPBUjB7JJtYQ5dUbjfRX3S5&abt_att=1&origin_referer=www.ozon.ru&captchaDone=true&sh=9EZS4ABl3Q
Сегодня, в конце бурной недели, у нас, коллеги, «бусинки». Большой текст про Ближний Восток уезжает на вскр., тем более, что он практически не устарел. Что меня удивило. Добавились лишь отдельные детали. Вообще в сфере ближневосточного «урегулирования» ситуация более чем интересна: ощущение, что все локальные игроки хотят, чтобы либо Трамп, либо Нетаньяху сыграли «первым номером». Кстати, в возможность применения я…
Три дня я копался в теме украинских пыточных подвалов и, честно говоря, у меня волосы шевелились на голове.
Как-то по умолчанию считается, что эти подвалы – часть украинской государственной системы, так же как и бусики с людоловами.
Я тоже так думал, однако все оказалось намного хуже. Ровно два года назад, в октябре-ноябре 2024 года, на фоне провала мобилизации на Украине узаконили мобилизацию в обход ТЦК и террито…
Идеологический вакуум, или Какие перспективы ждут вице-президента
Главный редактор ИА «Аврора» #ДмитрийЕвстафьев в специальном выпуске анализирует результаты промежуточных выборов в США
🤟 ПОЛНАЯ ВЕРСИЯ
Благодарим Вас за поддержку!
Поражение Трампа: что это меняет для США, России и мира?
Провальные для Республиканской партии промежуточные выборы ставят вопросы о системе управления в США на ближайшие два года и новых раскладах в международной политике. О перспективах переговоров по украинскому урегулированию, о демарше Джей Ди Вэнса и том, началась ли президентская гонка в США, о положении дел в обеих партиях и главном проигравшем на этих выбора…
У меня бабушка, природная яицкая казачка, из старшина, в таких ситуациях говорила старинную казацкую поговорку, звучит немного неприлично, но из песни, - особенно казацкой, - слова не выкинешь.
Звучало это так: "за свои же шанежки еще и пидарас"(с).
Велик и могуч неубиенный никаким начальством живой русский язык.
https://t.me/vityzeva/155059
В общем, тут такое дело! Для эвакуации тяжелораненых в осенне-зимний период нужно вот такое одеяло-мешок. Стоит 3200. Только что написали, что пришел груз и нам готовы отложить определенное количество.
Нам бы хотя бы десяток таких. Раздала бы медикам из эвакуационных групп. При большой потере крови это просто спасение. Реальное. Огромный шанс довезти до госпиталя живым.
Помогите пожалуйста!
Работаем дальше.
22022…
Друзья, подпишитесь пожалуйста на мой Рутуб-канал https://rutube.ru/channel/2811621/
Showing the 12 most recent of 594 posts we hold for @dimonundmir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@dimonundmir edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @dimonundmir as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
2 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
29 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
24 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 132 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@dimonundmir named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@izvestia named in 2 posts, 4 November 2026 – 5 November 2026 · confirmed gone 19 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@radio_sputnik named in 31 posts, 14 August 2026 – 6 November 2026
@special_authors named in 24 posts, 20 August 2026 – 23 October 2026
@rt_russian named in 20 posts, 24 August 2026 – 6 November 2026
@newsfrontnotes named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 12 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ДТ Д.Куликов-VZ-Т.Сергейцев @dtlive · 67,356 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Сергей Михеев @ironlogica · 209,599 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
Хазин @khazinml · 242,398 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Белый Филин @whitefilin · 22,797 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 September 2026
КазакоV @ale_kazakov · 47,136 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
Михаил Хазин @hazinOpen · 49,958 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Михаил Хазин Публикации @khazinmikhail · 51,449 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Ростислав Ищенко official @rostislavishchenko · 52,490 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
ДРОБНИЦКИЙ @DDrobnitski · 79,058 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Говорит Фурсов @govoritfursov · 129,221 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Дмитрий Перетолчин — «Картина Мира» @ndayclub · 23,536 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
СЕРГИЕНКО Владимир @vvsergienko · 41,365 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Михаил Хазин предупреждал @mikhailkhazin · 58,646 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
КЛИНЦЕВИЧ @aklintsevich · 53,745 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
ИЗОЛЕНТА live @izolentalive · 55,057 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ @dr_alex_sosnowski · 113,724 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Кеосаян daily @piloramatrue · 19,192 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
Андрей Девятов. Небополитика @andrejdevyatov · 25,336 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
Институт Русской Политической Культуры @fvuchannal · 28,628 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Пинта разума @pintofmind · 60,221 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
ПЕСКЕ + PESKE @apeske · 30,622 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
Мария Бутина @mariabutina · 30,992 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Алексей ПУШКОВ @alexey_pushkov · 41,102 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
Кургинян говорит @sek_speech · 20,243 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 222 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
Russian political scientist, Americanist and Author
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Профессор смотрит в мiръ. Авторский Анонимный канал Дмитрия Евстафьева” (@dimonundmir), 205,444 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dimonundmir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.