Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -271. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,624–41,977 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:59
41,665
-14
16 Sept 2026, 14:19
41,679
-11
14 Sept 2026, 17:40
41,690
-20
13 Sept 2026, 05:20
41,710
-8
11 Sept 2026, 08:58
41,718
-15
8 Sept 2026, 11:40
41,733
-8
5 Sept 2026, 08:22
41,741
-10
3 Sept 2026, 15:21
41,751
-14
2 Sept 2026, 10:04
41,765
-10
1 Sept 2026, 10:47
41,775
-7
31 Aug 2026, 11:44
41,782
-6
30 Aug 2026, 11:25
41,788
-9
29 Aug 2026, 08:28
41,797
-3
28 Aug 2026, 05:48
41,800
-12
27 Aug 2026, 05:59
41,812
-1
26 Aug 2026, 06:22
41,813
-12
25 Aug 2026, 05:08
41,825
-7
24 Aug 2026, 03:53
41,832
-6
22 Aug 2026, 12:42
41,838
-5
21 Aug 2026, 05:52
41,843
first reading
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 41,665 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,610
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
78 (25 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
263,850
Reactions total
5,915
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 02:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,160
Videos
≈1,610
Links
≈1,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10m 35s
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,603 reactions across 78 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,956
30.8%
❤
1,369
14.3%
💯
1,198
12.5%
🤬
1,008
10.5%
🤔
745
7.76%
🔥
621
6.47%
😁
487
5.07%
🤮
179
1.86%
👏
173
1.80%
🤝
131
1.36%
👎
112
1.17%
🤣
100
1.04%
🤯
68
0.708%
😱
56
0.583%
🙏
54
0.562%
🙈
51
0.531%
👻
50
0.521%
😨
45
0.469%
💊
33
0.344%
💩
28
0.292%
23 further kinds
139
1.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,603 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
АдГ побеждает на выборах в ландтаг земли Мекленбург-Передняя Померания в ФРГ!
Им не хватает 4 мандата, для большинства в земельном парламенте.
Партия Мерца-
НЕ ПРОШЛА!
В декабре в Германии могут быть перевыборы. Мерц в реалполитик должен нести ответственность за катастрофический провал своей партии. Скатертью как говориться дорога!
В Берлине победили левые, с иронией добавляю « пропалистинские силы». Видео из сети, как левые праздновали свою победу. Музыка народная. Танцы от души. Напоминаю ещё раз, это Берлин 2026 победа партии на земельных выборах.
На Россию прямо сейчас идёт сильная гибридная атака.
Если вы зайдите в социальные сети, Фейсбук, инстаграм, Твиттер ( Х) ( запрещенные и нежелательные в России), то увидите прям поток видео с просмотром 39 человек, 800, 14 тысяч- и всё они будоражат избирателей в России на тему: Как же все чудовищно. Я не подписан на этих людей, у них нет постоянного политического контента- значит о проплаченные алгоритмы.
В совре…
Первые подсчиты показали что в Померании таки Мерцовцы (ХДС) просочились в местный парламент:
Партия %
AfD 37,3%
SPD 35,5%
Linke 7,5%
Grüne 5,5%
CDU 5,3%
BSW 5,0%
FDP 1,1%
Другие 2,8%
Какое интересное видео из Берлина. Голос за кадром, каждый раз когда произносит АДГ ( альтернатива для Германии) ножом уничтожает избирательный Бюлетень. На фейк не похоже. На постановочное видео или ИИ- тоже нет. Другие партии идут в подсчет.
Сегодня в Берлине и передней Померании земельные выборы. Если партия Мерца набирает меньше 5% в Померании и не проходит в земельный парламент, Мерца с помпой "уйдут" из п…
2014–2025 —
Проведено
1 457 учений НАТО.
Это только учения, которые классифицируются как NATO exercises; национальные и многонациональные учения сюда не входят. Например, в 2017 НАТО дополнительно было связано со 181 национальным учением.
Для 2014 года показатель особенно показателен: НАТО сообщает о 162 мероприятиях своей программы + 40 национальных учениях в рамках мер усиления.
———-
Поехали дальше, берем просто их…
📻 Доброе утро.
Еврозона начнется
11:00 и до 12:00 по Москве
На волнах Вести ФМ или по ссылке
——-
Пока советник Трампа обвиняет Канцлера ФРГ в двуличии, у нас будет хороший, осенний день!
🔥"У них реваншизм прямо в мозгах, в крови, в позвоночнике" — Владимир Сергиенко о желании европейских политиков начать войну с Россией
"То, что в Европе сейчас творится в информационном пространстве, решения элит, хорошим примером является позиция Финляндии во время Второй Мировой войны. То они подчеркивают, что не являются союзниками нацистов, то ведут вместе наступательные действия.
После того, как они потерпели…
О хо-хо!!!!! Вот это уже не шуточная перепалка. США-Германия. Атака на лицо.
Бывший и. о директора Национальной разведки США (Acting DNI). Это руководитель всей разведывательной системы США, начиная от:
ЦРУ, АНБ, DIA и заканчивая Космических сил (SFI) и Береговой охраны (CGI), а также разведывательные подразделения ФБР (FBI), Госдепартамента (INR), Министерства энергетики (OICI) и Министерства финансов (OIA).
Бывший …
Администрация президента США Трампа отменила требования по значительному снижению выбросов для угольных и газовых электростанций, введенные администрацией Байдена. Американцам обещают, что они смогут "не гасить свет".
———
Зеленая Европа, в глубокой …. Энергетической депрессии. Могут ли европейцы конкурировать с США например в размещении Энергон кой продукции, а соотвественно и в конечной цене на товары? Смешно)))
👍43💯19🐳4❤3🔥2😁2
Signed Владимир Сергиенко
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @vvsergienko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Поддерживаю в случае если они получали западное финансирование40%
Поддерживаю в любом случае34%
Не поддерживаю10%
Пусть решает суд18%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@vvsergienko named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@radio_sputnik named in 4 posts, 9 September 2026 – 19 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Роман Бабаян @robabayan · 29,636 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СЕРГИЕНКО Владимир” (@vvsergienko), 41,665 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vvsergienko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.