Обращаем ваше внимание, на все изображения в блоге ставится водяной знак.
Реклама: @SwissVatnik_bot
Вопросы по сотрудничеству: @SwissVatnik_bot
Предложения на контактный адрес: [email protected]
Общение в чате: https://t.me/swissvatni
Created
27 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -243. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,727–34,042 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:40
33,763
-7
15 Sept 2026, 14:18
33,770
-19
13 Sept 2026, 21:37
33,789
-28
12 Sept 2026, 06:39
33,817
-11
9 Sept 2026, 23:41
33,828
-31
6 Sept 2026, 13:59
33,859
-23
4 Sept 2026, 04:20
33,882
-10
2 Sept 2026, 16:34
33,892
-3
1 Sept 2026, 15:53
33,895
-15
31 Aug 2026, 17:25
33,910
-1
30 Aug 2026, 17:32
33,911
-9
29 Aug 2026, 19:44
33,920
-5
28 Aug 2026, 18:23
33,925
+59
27 Aug 2026, 16:55
33,866
-2
26 Aug 2026, 16:06
33,868
-4
25 Aug 2026, 19:09
33,872
-11
24 Aug 2026, 15:37
33,883
-9
22 Aug 2026, 21:18
33,892
+6
21 Aug 2026, 07:46
33,886
-23
20 Aug 2026, 10:25
33,909
first reading
Engagement
498 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 33,763 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,750
274 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
274
of 498 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
498 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
1,027,760
Reactions total
33,083
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈41,600
Videos
≈10,000
Links
≈21,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 26m
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 128 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
59,934 reactions across 487 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
21,214
35.4%
👍
10,714
17.9%
❤
8,293
13.8%
🤬
5,672
9.46%
🙏
3,467
5.78%
🔥
3,425
5.71%
🤔
1,813
3.02%
👌
1,606
2.68%
😢
1,457
2.43%
🗿
765
1.28%
🍾
351
0.586%
🥰
217
0.362%
😎
193
0.322%
🤗
193
0.322%
✍
181
0.302%
🐳
116
0.194%
💔
113
0.189%
🏆
73
0.122%
🫡
47
0.078%
🆒
19
0.032%
2 further kinds
5
0.008%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 498 of the 498 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60,857 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 498 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 498 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SwissVatnik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 498 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В Италии мэр городка Cadoneghe Marco Schiesaro остановил церемонию принесения присяги для уроженки Марокко, которая пришла получать итальянский паспорт. Будущая итальянка пришла в муниципалитет для финального шага — подписания вердикта и произнесения официальной формулы верности Итальянской Республике. Однако женщина не только не смогла прочитать на итальянском языке текст присяги, она даже на элементарные вопросы мэ…
По сюжету телесериала «Семнадцать мгновений весны» Радистка Кэт при сильных родовых схватках кричала на русском языке хотя выдавала себя за немку. Перед родами Штирлиц предупреждал её, что в такие моменты женщина всегда кричит на своем родном языке, но Кэт была уверена, что сможет себя контролировать и будет кричать по-немецки.
📱 подпишись
📲 будь в курсе событий
Рубрика «А вы друзья как ни садитесь, все в музыканты не годитесь!» Премьер Венгрии Петер Мадьяр отказался вступать в созданную по инициативе Владимира Зеленского «Карпатскую восьмерку», заявив, что Будапешт не давал своего согласия на участие в новом региональном объединении. И чтобы два раза не вставать, Петер Мадьяр запретил строительство в стране строительство нового хранилища нефтепродуктов для Украины. Самое об…
Бывший Посол США в России совсем ёбу дал! Представьте лицо Си Цзиньпина, если бы за ним в аэропорт Дональд Трамп отправил «Uber», да еще оплатил поездку накопленным кэшбеком!
📱 подпишись
📲 будь в курсе событий
Любопытная табличка, благодаря которой можно вспомнить в каком году появился смартфон, WiFi, Skype и прочие полезные USB. SwissVatnika на картинке нет, но если у вас хорошая память, давайте вспомним, как давно Вы на меня подписаны (с некоторыми из моих подписчиков я знакома еще со времен Facebook и Twitter, когда они еще не были запрещены Роскомнадзором 🤫)
📱 подпишись
📲 будь в курсе событий
Рубрика «Просто хорошие новости»: 12 000 россиян подали заявки на отбор в отряд космонавтов. Гендиректор «Роскосмоса» Дмитрий Баканов рассказал о рекордном числе заявок, благодаря размещению заявки на портале Госуслуг:
«Важно отметить, что в этом году у нас был открытый набор в отряд космонавтов, и мы побили рекорд благодаря тому, что разместили объявление на едином портале Госуслуг разместили оповещение. Первичный …
В городе Линвуд (штат Калифорния) Дестини Харрисон (мать), Даниэля Монсона (отец) и Ану Сарсено-Каркамо (бабушка со стороны отца) обвиняют в пытках жестоком обращении и убийстве их восьмилетнего сына и внука Исайи Харрисона. Восьмилетний Исайя с раннего детства имел проблемы с лишним весом, любил есть по ночам и прятал еду в подушках дивана. Вместо того, чтобы отвезти ребенка к диетологу и показать профильным врачам,…
21 сентября 1962 года, после 48 лет отсутствия в Советский Союз с двумя концертами прибыл великий русский композитор, исполнитель и дирижер, один из самых значимых деятелей мирового искусства XX века Игорь Стравинский
Гастроли Игоря Стравинского длились три недели и стали одним из главных культурных событий эпохи «хрущёвской оттепели». Концерты Игоря Стравинского с успехом прошли в Москве и Ленинграде. Композитор ли…
🙏54❤15👍9😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 498 posts we hold for @SwissVatnik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какую реакцию в теле певицы рОтом вызывает запрет петь на русском языке?
Вызывает обильный понос66%
Сильное потоотделение11%
Насморк10%
Запор33%
Свой вариант в комментах2%
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 498 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Кот Костян - официальный канал🇷🇺 @kotreal · 156,848#90
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Весёлый Душнила @dushnilio · 43,042 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
real cultras @real_cultras · 24,291 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Мария Бутина @mariabutina · 31,264 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Суеверная Демократия @sueverdem · 51,329 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
Вехи истории @vexiistorii · 58,139 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Zanoza @Zanoza_yana · 23,947 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
Английский для лентяев @lazy_teaches · 28,411 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
🎭 Политический Юмор 🎭 @Humor_and_Politics · 33,062 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
Расстрельный @rasstrelny · 100,649 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Коза кричала @kozakrichala · 180,817 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Приколюшечки - позитив каждый день @greenhoody · 28,081 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
Голос Мордора @golosmordora1 · 148,807 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
ШАХНАЗАРОВ @iikhu · 155,063 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ @dr_alex_sosnowski · 114,426 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Русские деньги @cashruss · 130,024 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Жёлтая утка @zheltayautka · 36,338 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
Оптимистка в штатском 🇷🇺 @optimistkavshtatskom · 39,533 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
Z НеСоциальная Сеть (Тро Барбаросса) @NeSocSeti · 26,110 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Хрюн Моржов @hrunmorgov · 29,722 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
Папочка канцлера @kanzlerdaddy · 72,142 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Пикник на обочине @picnicelena · 28,080 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
Агентство Второстепенных Новостей @coolnews1 · 23,937 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026
Саваничи 🇷🇺 @savanichi · 194,356 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Абзац. Видео @Absatzvideo · 23,020 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Swiss Vatnik” (@SwissVatnik), 33,763 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SwissVatnik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.