Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Медиасрачи 3.0

Channel

Медиасрачи 3.0

@mediasrachi3

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,715subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001247358039
TypeChannel
Username@mediasrachi3
Created3 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mediasrachi3

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,69015,71715,703.55 August 2026 — 15,712 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,712 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,713 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,712 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,710 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,712 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,708 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,706 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,704 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,706 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,709 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,710 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,704 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,702 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,699 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,697 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,696 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,694 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,693 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,692 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,690 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,711 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,714 subscribers9 September 2026 — 15,716 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,717 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,715 subscribers15,7155 August 202617 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 43 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,686–15,721 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:0015,715-2
13 Sept 2026, 23:2015,717+1
9 Sept 2026, 22:3515,716+2
6 Sept 2026, 13:4115,714+3
4 Sept 2026, 04:3915,711+21
2 Sept 2026, 20:2615,690-2
1 Sept 2026, 19:2315,692-1
31 Aug 2026, 22:3615,693-1
29 Aug 2026, 23:3415,694-2
28 Aug 2026, 23:3415,696-1
27 Aug 2026, 22:5615,697-2
24 Aug 2026, 20:5415,699-3
23 Aug 2026, 07:0715,702-2
21 Aug 2026, 18:0515,704-6
19 Aug 2026, 14:0815,710+1
18 Aug 2026, 15:2315,709+3
16 Aug 2026, 05:4515,706+2
14 Aug 2026, 13:3415,704-2
13 Aug 2026, 02:5415,706-2
12 Aug 2026, 02:1715,708first reading

Engagement

189 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 15,715 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,970
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 189 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held189 (31 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total86,894
Reactions total2,977
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13m 19s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,416 reactions across 177 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯4,12333.2%
❤2,92823.6%
👏2,83422.8%
🤣1,49212.0%
😁2431.96%
🔥1160.934%
😱820.66%
🤬600.483%
🤮600.483%
🐳540.435%
💊340.274%
👀310.25%
😨310.25%
🌚300.242%
🤝270.217%
🤷‍♀270.217%
😢250.201%
🙏250.201%
🆒180.145%
👍140.113%
27 further kinds1621.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 189 of the 189 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 189 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 189 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mediasrachi3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 189 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC516 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Акопов вышел на пенсию, чтобы давать вот такие многозначительные интервью, видимо. В стиле «надо снимать хорошее кино». Спасибо, кэп.

💯19❤15👏15🤣5🐳1

3 Sept 2026, 08:14 UTC808 views64 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Что делает магия той самой песни: билетов на сегодняшний концерт Шуфутинского в Кремле нет. Он календарь перевернул и получил солдаут в одном из самых больших концертных залов страны.

💯22👏17❤16🤣7🔥1🤝1

2 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,440 views54 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Муд - когда тебе в гости приехало полтора миллиарда.

💯18❤16👏15🤣5

2 Sept 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,770 views62 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Это так Сергей Михайлович намекает, что кукиш вам, а не голливудские мультики в отечественном прокате в этом году.

💯21❤18👏17🙈5🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,450 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

А чего в жизни добился ты?

👏16💯16❤15🤣6🔥1🤮1

2 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC≈1,860 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Нет согласия среди техногигантов относительно ИИ. Если коротко, проблемы две: - Невозможность гарантировать, что обучатся нейросети будут используя "безопасный контент" - Ну и конечно же лавандос за используемую интеллектуальную собственность. В общем, поезд пока так и стоит на запасном пути.

👏16❤15💯15🤷‍♂2👀1

2 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,810 views57 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Появились первые рендеры отеля в «Крестах». Такой вот тюремный люкс.

❤17👏16💯14🔥4😁3😱2😨1

2 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,740 views58 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Знаете как выглядит шизоидный паноптикум? Это когда Дюжев на аукционе толкает документ с автографом Екатерины II. Сонный паралич более естественно ощущается...

💯19❤16👏15💊4🤣3🐳1

2 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC≈1,610 views108 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Евгению Леонову сегодня исполнилось бы 100 лет. Один из самых любимых актёров среди россиян на все времена. Знаете, сколько фильмов с его участием сегодня покажут большие федеральные каналы вроде «Первого», «России-1», НТВ и т. д.? Ответ — 0. Такая вот @@@, собачка. (с)

❤51👏22💯21🤬10🤮2🌚1🤯1

1 Sept 2026, 15:25 UTC≈2,150 views56 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Неиссякаем поток фантазии редакторов «Ведомостей» относительно новостей про российский фондовый рынок.

💯17❤16👏15🤣6☃2

1 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTC≈2,110 views56 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Сергей Витальевич Безруков — чисто когда всю неделю скроллил новостную ленту.

💯24👏17❤15

1 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,650 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Что ни день, то новые запреты. Ждем реакции российской оппозиции и западной прессы.

💯19🤣19👏16❤15🔥1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 189 posts we hold for @mediasrachi3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ПроСМИсь
@prosmis · 102,305
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
Медиавойны
@mediavoyni · 39,276
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
ХАЙЛАЙТЕР
@goshakartsevcalling · 40,066
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026
Журналистика
@dddjournalism · 131,033
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Медиасрачи 3.0” (@mediasrachi3), 15,715 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediasrachi3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.