Если у вас есть интересная история, знайте, что вы всегда можете поделиться ей с Папочкой!
Бот: @kanzlerdaddy_new_bot
Почта: [email protected]
В чате запрещены призывы к насилию, спам, реклама и ссылки на сторонние ресурсы.
№ 4925393697
#UQGCU
Created
25 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 45 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,812–72,385 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 14:57
72,142
+7
17 Sept 2026, 04:55
72,135
-28
15 Sept 2026, 05:41
72,163
-25
13 Sept 2026, 12:21
72,188
-12
11 Sept 2026, 14:57
72,200
+15
9 Sept 2026, 00:20
72,185
+245
5 Sept 2026, 15:16
71,940
+40
3 Sept 2026, 17:17
71,900
+22
2 Sept 2026, 06:44
71,878
-1
1 Sept 2026, 07:37
71,879
-19
31 Aug 2026, 05:04
71,898
-18
30 Aug 2026, 08:24
71,916
-17
29 Aug 2026, 07:18
71,933
-76
28 Aug 2026, 06:47
72,009
+29
27 Aug 2026, 08:23
71,980
-25
26 Aug 2026, 05:38
72,005
-17
25 Aug 2026, 05:54
72,022
-23
24 Aug 2026, 03:28
72,045
-84
22 Aug 2026, 10:17
72,129
+13
20 Aug 2026, 23:24
72,116
first reading
Engagement
939 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.84%
avg views ÷ 72,142 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,380
594 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
594
of 939 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
939 (4 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
3,786,965
Reactions total
91,624
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 12:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,800
Videos
≈8,130
Links
≈23,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 48m
Average length
1m 18s
Measured directly from 221 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
129,263 reactions across 917 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
29,832
23.1%
🤡
27,797
21.5%
👍
22,120
17.1%
🤬
17,356
13.4%
❤
7,813
6.04%
👏
7,130
5.52%
🔥
5,917
4.58%
😱
4,162
3.22%
🤯
3,443
2.66%
😢
1,153
0.892%
🤔
1,099
0.85%
🙏
839
0.649%
👎
564
0.436%
😍
38
0.029%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 937 of the 939 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131,696 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 939 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 939 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kanzlerdaddy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 939 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В августе цены на топливо в ЕС взлетели на 23,8% по сравнению с прошлым годом
В числе стран, где рост стоимости оказался особенно заметным, засветилась Германия с 27,5%. По сравнению с июлем 2026-го, дизель в евросаде подорожал на 8,3%, бензин — на 3,3%.
Это не всё: во II квартале 2026-го стоимость импорта нефти в ЕС выросла на 55,8% по сравнению со среднемесячным уровнем 2025 года, хотя объём существенно не увелич…
«Немецкие автопроизводители продолжают сдавать позиции»
Грустные результаты показал анализ EY, где сравнили деятельность ведущих мировых автопроизводителей:
• В то время как конкуренты по всему миру растут, прибыль VW, Mercedes и BMW снизилась на 19% — до €13 млрд. Это самый низкий показатель с пандемийного 2020 года.
• «Made in Germany» — больше не символ качества, а символ высоких затрат на зарплаты, энергию и р…
«Это так, но я должна сказать: чем ближе я знакомилась с Екатериной Великой, тем критичнее становилось моё отношение к ней. Она действительно была российской царицей немецкого происхождения, но с ней связаны потёмкинские деревни. И она также была весьма успешной завоевательницей. Она была выдающейся правительницей, женщиной-правительницей — именно по этой причине мне её [изображение Екатерины] когда-то подарили. Но в…
«Забытый мировой порядок 1990 года: Германия снова хочет быть ведущей державой»
Бывший статс-секретарь МИД ГДР Ханс Миссельвиц, участвовавший в переговорах по объединению Германии «2 + 4», достаёт из архива договорённости 1990 года. Тогда ФРГ обещала, что «с немецкой земли будет исходить только мир», а для армии установили жёсткие ограничения.
Но с приходом в 2022 году шольцевского «поворота времён» «мирная политик…
«Позвольте мне сказать, что в такой день, как сегодня, и после такого вечера, как вчера, возможно, стоит поразмышлять о том, чему мы можем научиться у Конрада Аденауэра. <…> Для него было ясно: нужно строить мосты, и в то же время становилось ясно, с кем мосты строить нельзя. Эти мосты всегда основывались на ценностях. Но — и это был урок, извлеченный из провала центристской партии, — они должны были быть мостами меж…
Сотрудника церкви в Бремене подозревают в распространении порнографии
Мужчина на добровольной основе работал в Евангелической общине Грёпелинген и Ослебсхаузен. Как только стало известно о его грязных делишках, церковь отстранила извращенца от деятельности и обратилась в прокуратуру.
По меньшей мере пострадали два человека, не исключено, что «затронуты и другие лица». Подробности правоохранители не сообщают. Церков…
«Для [партии канцлера Мерца] ХДС это [итоги выборов] исторический перелом. <…> И это, я думаю, потрясёт ХДС до мозга костей и на федеральном уровне, потому что в конечном счёте это может быть и своего рода началом упадка христианской демократии в Германии. <…> Мекленбург — Передняя Померания вчера внесла решающий вклад в то, что мы, возможно, скоро избавимся от Мерца в качестве федерального канцлера»
Торе Штайн из о…
«У промышленного труда есть будущее, и у автомобильных концернов есть будущее!»
Профсоюз IG Metall призвал производителей и поставщиков автопрома более чем в 200 местах по всей Германии к протестам против сокращений рабочих мест и увольнений на заводах. Среди митингующих были 20 тыс. сотрудников автоконцерна Mercedes.
Тем временем Mercedes подумывает закрыть два завода, если «не будут снижены затраты на труд».
Дой…
Такого бессмысленного бреда я не слышал со времен комсомольских собраний в нашем институте.
😁103❤10🔥10👏4🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 939 posts we hold for @kanzlerdaddy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@kanzlerdaddy edited 15 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Камрады, как думаете, что значит den Bock zum Gärtner machen?
Поручить человеку дело, для которого он не подходит45%
Выносить сор из избы4%
Из грязи в князи?11%
Так говорят о человеке, который очень изменился2%
Резко менять своё мнение, переобуваться11%
Бесполезно, бессмысленно, как с козла молока20%
Обзываться удумал, Папочка?1%
Понятия не имею6%
А я знаю и уже иду умничать в комментариях!2%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 939 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 90 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kanzlerdaddy named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@radio_sputnik named in 1 post, 28 August 2026 – 28 August 2026
@rt_de named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Голос Германии @GolosGermanii · 22,705 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 September 2026
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ @dr_alex_sosnowski · 114,426 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
FYTW @fuckyouthatswhy · 24,146 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
КОРНИЛОВ @kornilov1968 · 119,155 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
СЕРГИЕНКО Владимир @vvsergienko · 41,665 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
ПЕСКЕ + PESKE @apeske · 31,003 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
Малек Дудаков @malekdudakov · 82,833 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Агентство Второстепенных Новостей @coolnews1 · 23,937 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026
Swiss Vatnik @SwissVatnik · 33,763 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Neues aus Russland 🪆📢 Alina Lipp @neuesausrussland · 162,572 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Расстрельный @rasstrelny · 100,649 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Нити Империи @RusUnlimited · 106,048 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
"Нефтегазовая игра" с Александром Фроловым @OilGasGame · 24,893 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Испания Наизнанку @realspaininsideout · 21,834 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
BALTNEWS @baltnews · 24,444 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
Радио Стыдоба @Radiostydoba · 93,901 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
ИноСМИ @inosmichannel · 144,492 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Satellit @satellit_de · 61,274 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Analytik & News @analytik_news · 34,882 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
Ostnews Faktencheck @ostnews_faktencheck · 42,640 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Карманов без Китая @kabezki · 38,713 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Настоящая Франция @mme_perrier · 27,158 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Anti-Spiegel - Offizieller Kanal @AntiSpiegel · 122,585 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Коза кричала @kozakrichala · 180,817 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Папочка канцлера” (@kanzlerdaddy), 72,142 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kanzlerdaddy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.