International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -701. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 164,888–166,195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 21:21
165,087
+44
15 Sept 2026, 19:42
165,043
-82
14 Sept 2026, 03:57
165,125
+86
12 Sept 2026, 08:20
165,039
-27
10 Sept 2026, 02:00
165,066
-142
6 Sept 2026, 22:21
165,208
+30
4 Sept 2026, 07:39
165,178
-6
2 Sept 2026, 17:55
165,184
-52
1 Sept 2026, 16:04
165,236
-28
31 Aug 2026, 19:38
165,264
-30
30 Aug 2026, 17:43
165,294
-38
29 Aug 2026, 17:54
165,332
-71
28 Aug 2026, 15:38
165,403
-19
27 Aug 2026, 13:33
165,422
-25
26 Aug 2026, 15:54
165,447
-45
25 Aug 2026, 17:08
165,492
-17
24 Aug 2026, 14:45
165,509
-80
23 Aug 2026, 00:46
165,589
-81
21 Aug 2026, 13:58
165,670
-24
20 Aug 2026, 12:13
165,694
first reading
Engagement
517 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 165,087 subscribers
Avg views / post
27,700
334 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
334
of 517 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
517 (3 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
9,244,600
Reactions total
118,612
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 08:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,900
Videos
≈1,050
Links
≈10,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
42m 34s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
182,590 reactions across 497 posts, in 68 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
30,695
16.8%
💯
26,920
14.7%
😁
23,251
12.7%
🤡
15,309
8.38%
🤣
14,868
8.14%
❤
14,353
7.86%
🤬
9,749
5.34%
🔥
7,762
4.25%
💩
6,755
3.70%
🤔
5,948
3.26%
👎
5,491
3.01%
😱
3,583
1.96%
👏
2,956
1.62%
😢
2,707
1.48%
🤯
2,554
1.40%
🙏
1,582
0.866%
🥱
1,187
0.65%
💊
824
0.451%
🥴
582
0.319%
🙈
552
0.302%
48 further kinds
4,962
2.72%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 517 of the 517 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189,864 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 517 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
54
across the posts below
Posts paid on
38
of 517 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @obrazbuduschego2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 517 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Трамп:
«Как и ожидалось, "фейковые новости" CNN, Politico (им нужно вернуть 8 миллионов долларов, которые правительство США выделило, чтобы они могли продолжать свою деятельность!), и MSNOW (ранее известная как MSDNC!), подали в суд, чтобы получить доступ в Белый дом и к вашему президенту, то есть ко мне!
Они выбрали себе "отличного" судью, по крайней мере, для них – человека, который вынес решение в пользу Джима Ак…
Представитель демпартии в Палате представителей США Хаким Джеффрис:
«Движение MAGA в панике. Они могут убегать, но не могут спрятаться, потому что время уходит. Через 46 дней американский народ потребует от них ответа за то, что они потерпели полное и абсолютное поражение.
Их экономическая политика была катастрофой. Эта политика вредит американскому народу. Эта безрассудная и дорогостоящая война, которую они по со…
Заявление Трампа о том, что Россия потеряла контроль над производством дизеля, оч. странное, так как именно дизель в продаже есть.
Это в США на него выросли цены.
CNN, MS NOW и Politico подали в суд на администрацию Трампа после того, как Белый дом отозвал их аккредитацию для представителей СМИ, утверждая, что этот шаг нарушает Первую поправку к Конституции.
Представители этих СМИ заявляют, что они стали объектом преследования из-за своей журналистской деятельности, в то время как президент Трамп оправдал запрет, заявив, что он не обязан допускать в Белый дом издания, публикую…
Про выборный триумф «Единой России». Официальный агитпроп и комментаторы будут рассказывать про консолидацию вокруг флага. Антирежимный агитпроп и комментаторы – про то, как набросали/задавили и как режим ещё больше сузил пространство электоральной демократии. Блогеры поворчат и согласятся, что начальству было важнее убедительно продемонстрировать сплочённость и поддержку, чем всякие там свободы, настроения и разрешё…
Все выборы всегда проходят по одному сценарию. Сначала на сцена выводят скоморохов, которые шумят о том, что скоро будет иначе.
Иначе не случается, и потом скоморохов выводят со сцены кого куда, некоторых даже в ту же Думу. Послужил же для снятия Яблока.
Некоторые, кто шумел про иначе, и вовсе разжалованы из депутатов.
В российской политической культуре роль парламента всегда была высокая, а отдельного депутата – нич…
На западе от результатов выборов в России ждали сигналов, тихих манифестаций и прочих наивных радостей.
Получили однозначную определенность. Результат ЕР выше, чем 5 лет назад.
Дмитрий Куликов чаще всего хорош, но сегодня просто плох. Зачем срезать Александра Лосева, когда он пытается прогнозировать действия США, исходя из моделей современности и будущей неопределенности.
Куликов все это бесконечно прерывает и навязывает модель – была Гражданская война Севера и Юга, значит она будет.
Ну дайте сказать более сложному чем вы философу.
😁117👍88❤21🔥7👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 517 posts we hold for @obrazbuduschego2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@obrazbuduschego2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 517 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 100 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 162 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Оκτагон @octagonmedia · 27,475 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Это ещё не конец @nonetutto · 136,217 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Shadow policy @shadow_policy · 30,793 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Мастер пера @master_pera · 59,886 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
БОЛЬШОЙ ТРАНСФЕР @bigtransfer2024 · 75,120 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Распутица @rasputicaa · 124,370 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
Win-Win @victorstepanych · 156,134 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Темник @polittemnik · 201,201 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
Кремлёвский безБашенник @kremlebezBashennik · 67,058 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Канал визионера @vizioner_rf · 78,782 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Китайская угроза @daokedao · 99,214 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
ПОЛИТИКА В КРУГУ @politicsinthecircle · 114,599 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Преемник @preemnik · 31,983 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Мадам Секретарь @madam_secretar · 36,003 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
ПУЛ Telegram @tgrussia · 52,429 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Что делать? @chto_delat_2022 · 65,407 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
Политтранзит @PolitTransit · 85,645 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
Чёрный Лебедь @swaneconomy · 135,562 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
SEMPER IRATUS @omnitempore · 179,507 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™ @politjoystic · 250,578 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Кремлевский шептун 🚀 @kremlin_sekret · 386,945 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Тот самый Олень🦌 @trueolen · 139,195 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 3 September 2026
Неудаща @dirtytatarstan · 40,134 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Китай — Вавилов @shuohuaxia · 144,665 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 516 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Комарова, Наталья Владимировна(ru.wikipedia.org) “…том числе больницы в [[Нижневартовск]]е{{Cite web|lang=ru|url=https://t.me/obrazbuduschego2/13499|title=Губернатор ХМАО Комарова продемонстрировала…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Образ будущего” (@obrazbuduschego2), 165,087 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obrazbuduschego2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
