Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pro Космос

Channel

Pro Космос

@prokosmosru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

52,217subscribers

-237 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001944501601
TypeChannel
Username@prokosmosru
DescriptionКаждый день рассказываем о космических технологиях, астрофизике и научных программах. Больше интересного на сайте: https://prokosmos.ru/ РКН: https://clck.ru/3PFgZX
Created31 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prokosmosru

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

52,21752,45452,335.56 August 2026 — 52,454 subscribers6 August 2026 — 52,454 subscribers6 August 2026 — 52,445 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,442 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,435 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,425 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,421 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,405 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,393 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,364 subscribers14 August 2026 — 52,354 subscribers15 August 2026 — 52,342 subscribers16 August 2026 — 52,336 subscribers17 August 2026 — 52,321 subscribers19 August 2026 — 52,313 subscribers20 August 2026 — 52,298 subscribers21 August 2026 — 52,278 subscribers22 August 2026 — 52,267 subscribers24 August 2026 — 52,259 subscribers25 August 2026 — 52,249 subscribers26 August 2026 — 52,242 subscribers27 August 2026 — 52,236 subscribers28 August 2026 — 52,231 subscribers29 August 2026 — 52,223 subscribers30 August 2026 — 52,217 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
25 measurements spanning 24 days, net -237. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,181–52,490 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 02:4752,217-6
29 Aug 2026, 05:4452,223-8
28 Aug 2026, 07:2552,231-5
27 Aug 2026, 06:2552,236-6
26 Aug 2026, 04:4252,242-7
25 Aug 2026, 04:4852,249-10
24 Aug 2026, 00:3652,259-8
22 Aug 2026, 05:4852,267-11
21 Aug 2026, 00:4852,278-20
20 Aug 2026, 01:3252,298-15
19 Aug 2026, 01:0752,313-8
17 Aug 2026, 21:3352,321-15
16 Aug 2026, 22:2552,336-6
15 Aug 2026, 19:2752,342-12
14 Aug 2026, 10:1852,354-10
13 Aug 2026, 01:0552,364-29
12 Aug 2026, 02:1652,393-12
11 Aug 2026, 03:3652,405-16
10 Aug 2026, 07:0252,421-4
9 Aug 2026, 07:5452,425first reading

Engagement

130 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.58%
avg views ÷ 52,217 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,480
130 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
130
of 130 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 128 of 130 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held130 (3 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total582,250
Reactions total6,782
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,160
Videos
2,370
Links
8,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 59s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,408 reactions across 119 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,05047.6%
89814.0%
🤔72611.3%
🔥69910.9%
😁2173.39%
🎉2143.34%
🤯1812.82%
👏1582.47%
911.42%
👀831.30%
🤩580.905%
😍290.453%
🥰40.062%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 130 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,782reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈2,170 views23 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🔭 Астрономический прогноз: какие планеты наблюдать в сентябре? Осеннее небо обещает стать настоящим подарком для наблюдений. Сентябрь будет богат на яркие планеты и эффектные сближения. Сближения планет со спутником Земли: 14 сентября — Венера и Луна; 6 сентября — Марс и Луна; 8 сентября — Юпитер и Луна; 12 сентября — Меркурий и Луна; 26–27 сентября — Сатурн и полная Урожайная Луна. ➡️ Больше о наблюдениях в сентя

12🔥7👍4

29 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈3,190 views45 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🚀 NASA начало устанавливать двигатели на ракету SLS для миссии Artemis III Четыре двигателя RS-25 монтируют на центральный блок — каждый весит 3,5 т и развивает тягу почти 227 т. Все они уже летали в космос на шаттлах. Параллельно специалисты собирают твердотопливные ускорители и готовят корабль «Орион». Запуск к Луне с экипажем намечен на 2027 год.

😁1814👍9🤔4

28 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈3,730 views61 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

😭 Представьте: миллиард лет назад на Венере плескались океаны Свежее исследование доказывает: следы исчезнувших морей запечатаны прямо на венерианских равнинах. Наш эксперт Игорь Афанасьев сравнил гипотезу о древних океанах на Венере с распространённым представлением о планете как о сухом мире, залитом магмой. ❓ А вы как думаете, какой была раньше «адская планета»?

👍29🤔274🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,670 views46 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🎊 500-й мировой выход в открытый космос совершили китайские космонавты В ночь с 27 на 28 августа космонавты Чжу Янчжу и Чжан Чжиюань выполнили работы за бортом станции «Тяньгун». За 5,5 часов они провели техническое обслуживание солнечных батарей и установили несколько защитных экранов от космического мусора.

👍29🔥16🎉1

28 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈3,670 views42 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🟣 В МАИ создали тренажер для подготовки космонавтов к Луне и Марсу Платформа наклоняется по заданной программе, помогая организму привыкать к смене гравитации. Устройство размером чуть больше напольных весов — его можно разместить на борту космического корабля.

👍318😁2🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈3,540 views41 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

✅ «Прогресс МС-35» допущен к заправке на космодроме Байконур В течение ближайших дней специалисты начнут работы по заправке грузового корабля топливными компонентами и сжатыми газами. Старт «Прогресса МС-35» к МКС ожидается через несколько недель.

👍347

28 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈3,400 views39 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🔑 В столице показывают дубликат хрустального ключа, подаренного Юрию Гагарину В Музее космонавтики выставили точную копию хрустального ключа от города Дятьково, который вручили Юрию Гагарину в 1966 году. Экспозиция продлится до 22 ноября 2026 года.

👍30🎉53😁1

28 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈3,670 views48 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Участники конкурса «Сверхнизкие орбиты» показали двигатели для спутников 13 команд представили широкий спектр подходов для аппаратов, которые должны работать на сверхнизких орбитах. Среди решений — ионные и холловские двигатели, водные электротермические двигатели, солнечный термосублимационный двигатель, двигатель из углепластика и даже тросовая система без расхода топлива.

👍31🤔74👏4🤯1😁1

28 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC≈3,930 views49 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🔭 Лунный грунт хранит следы древних сверхновых Астрофизики создали математическую модель, которая восстанавливает историю вспышек сверхновых звёзд по реголиту. Алгоритм поможет участникам исследовательской программы «Артемида».

👍38🤔8🔥21

27 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈4,540 views63 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🌚 Сегодня в небе появится Осетровая Луна Не пропустите августовское полнолуние в ночь с 27 на 28 августа. В этом году оно совпадает с частным лунным затмением. Часть спутника Земли может потемнеть и приобрести бурый, медный или красноватый оттенок. ➡️ Откуда пошло название и как наблюдать Осетровую Луну, рассказали здесь.

32👍16🤩10😍3🤔1😁1

27 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈4,210 views44 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇳 На Хайнане создали Международный центр обслуживания аэрокосмических данных Центр создали во время аэрокосмического форума в городе Вэньчан, где также заключили соглашения с десятками компаний по спутникостроению, коммерческим запускам и космическому туризму. Власти рассчитывают сформировать на острове инфраструктуру, которая позволит проводить коммерческие пуски чаще. ➡️ Pro Космос в МАКС | ВК | ОК

👍359

27 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈4,250 views56 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🚀 SpaceX прекращает запуски Falcon 9 со спутниками Starlink из Флориды Последний старт ракеты Falcon 9 со «Старлинками» с мыса Канаверал состоялся 26 августа. Теперь компания Илона Маска переходит на более мощную и вместительную систему Starship для вывода спутников нового поколения Starlink V3.

🤔41🤯742👀2

Showing the 12 most recent of 130 posts we hold for @prokosmosru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@prokosmosru edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,040 voters approx.

Что стало с Белкой и Стрелкой после полёта?

  1. Они отправились в ещё один полёт5%
  2. Они прожили до глубокой старости в виварии85%
  3. Их выпустили на волю10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz975 voters

Почему на орбиту выбирали собак-девочек?

  1. Они меньше весят11%
  2. Они лучше переносят шум6%
  3. Они более покладисты и терпеливы84%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz926 voters

Кто летел вместе с Белкой и Стрелкой?

  1. Кот и попугай2%
  2. Мыши, мухи, растения и грибы56%
  3. Только мыши43%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz882 voters

Сколько времени длился полёт Белки и Стрелки?

  1. 25 часов31%
  2. 48 часов26%
  3. 12 часов43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 72,704 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Роскосмос
@roscosmos_gk · 119,396
#1
Закрытый космос
@roscosmos_press · 14,634
#2
Летопись космической эры
@zheleznyakov_spaceera · 8,056
#3
Хайтек+
@htech_plus · 64,282
#4
Контакт подъема
@space78125 · 9,080
#5
РКК "Энергия"
@rsc_energia · 5,255
#6
WarGonzo
@wargonzo · 747,689
#7
Центр подготовки космонавтов имени Ю.А. Гагарина
@GagarinCosmonautTrainingCenter · 6,010
#8
Pro Космос | Космонавтика и астрофизика
@realprocosmos · 5,380
#9
Добрый Овчинников
@dobriy_ovchinnikov · 6,269
#10
Космодайвер
@cosmodivers · 3,491
#11
Космический Хроникон
@grimdarknessoffarspace · 3,020
#12
Спутник ДЗЗ
@sputnikDZZ · 4,847
#13
SPUTNIX
@sputnixru · 2,456
#14
Леонид Еленин | Писатель и астроном
@leonideleninofficial · 4,473
#15
ИКИ РАН (пресс-служба)
@mediaiki · 2,966
#16
Космос на связи
@rscc_rscc · 2,321
#17
Ветер Восточный 🚀
@wind_vostok · 2,883
#18
Alice in Wonder New Space / Алиса Зарипова
@aliceinwondernewspace · 1,993
#19
В космосе никто не услышит твой смех
@kosmosmem · 1,910
#20
Планшет Гагарина
@planshetgagarina · 2,136
#21
Космический фотоальбом
@myown_link · 3,169
#22
Я сказал «Поехали»!
@cosmotours · 9,960
#23
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 518,017
#24
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 740,299
#25
Два майора
@dva_majors · 1,161,125
#26
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,972,119
#27
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 489,168
#28
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 277,968
#29
Mash
@mash · 3,108,095
#30
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны
@rvvoenkor · 1,461,869
#31
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 915,355
#32
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,010,251
#33
СОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,095,627
#34
Военный Осведомитель
@milinfolive · 615,543
#35
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,671,633
#36
МИГ России
@mig41 · 473,635
#37
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 495,774
#38
Повёрнутые на войне 🇷🇺
@voenacher · 666,892
#39
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 475,070
#40
Белорусский силовик
@belarusian_silovik · 450,963
#41
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие
@warhistoryalconafter · 483,215
#42
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,060,079
#43
Сладков+
@sladkov_plus · 698,049
#44
Воевода Вещает
@ZOV_Voevoda · 169,419
#45
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 425,201
#46
ZERGULIO
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 444,298
#47
Zлой Пруф️
@proofzzz · 601,599
#48
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 323,028
#49
Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition
@epoddubny · 571,475
#50
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 655,817
#51
Банкста
@banksta · 437,547
#52
ТАСС
@tass_agency · 567,813
#53
Украина.ру
@ukr_2025_ru · 494,044
#54
Минобороны России
@mod_russia · 644,028
#55
Бочарик (ага, тот самый)
@botcharov · 210,788
#56
Русский инженер
@rusengineer · 124,318
#57
Олег Царёв
@olegtsarov · 401,417
#58
Военный обозреватель
@new_militarycolumnist · 205,962
#59
Win-Win
@victorstepanych · 156,133
#60
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,258,600
#61
Осташко! Важное
@ostashkonews · 421,238
#62
Военкор Котенок
@voenkorKotenok · 314,333
#63
RAG&E - Razvedos Advanced Gear & Equipment
@razvedosaa · 137,988
#64
ИноСМИ
@inosmichannel · 144,914
#65
Выпускайте КракенаZ!
@rlz_the_kraken · 505,349
#66
ANNA NEWS
@anna_news · 236,375
#67
Мир Михаила Онуфриенко
@mikle1on · 490,593
#68
Крупнокалиберный Переполох
@bolshiepushki · 326,133
#69
bmpd
@bmpd_cast · 46,808
#70
Spydell_finance
@spydell_finance · 130,726
#71
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 971,362
#72
🇷🇺Дневник Мракоборцев🇷🇺 Территория Героев
@iamsniper · 136,712
#73
Геоэнергетика ИНФО
@geonrgru · 138,619
#74
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 181,007
#75
Военное обозрение
@topwar_official · 97,758
#76
Саваничи 🇷🇺
@savanichi · 195,093
#77
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 320,944
#78
Yaplakal.com
@yaplakal · 422,420
#79
Мария Захарова
@mariavladimirovnazakharova · 465,754
#80
Захар Прилепин
@zakharprilepin · 226,107
#81
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 901,284
#82
Разработчик БПЛА
@UAVDEV · 122,594
#83
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,672,475
#84
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,709,529
#85
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,540,451
#86
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 431,163
#87
Александр Ходаковский
@aleksandr_skif · 316,795
#88
Рамзай
@ramzayiegokomanda · 152,971
#89
ZАПИСКИ VЕТЕРАНА 🇷🇺
@notes_veterans · 281,846
#90
ТРОЙКА 🏴‍☠️
@rustroyka1945 · 190,526
#91

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Хайтек+
@htech_plus · 64,282
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Роскосмос
@roscosmos_gk · 119,396
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Kosmos Time | Наука | Физика
@kosmostime · 63,667
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pro Космос” (@prokosmosru), 52,217 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prokosmosru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.