В МАХ: https://max.ru/mig41
РКН: https://clck.ru/3F7uDx
Коммерч. сотрудничество: @MIC_connection_bot
По делу @MiG_2connect_bot
Тексты/комменты: https://sponsr.ru/ark6
"Крытка" https://clck.ru/3F8STE
Репост чужих постов не означает их поддержки
Created
29 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Майор и Генерал” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 33 days, net -5,478. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 471,312–478,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 18:16
472,134
-398
4 Sept 2026, 22:38
472,532
-155
3 Sept 2026, 10:03
472,687
-417
2 Sept 2026, 04:55
473,104
-136
1 Sept 2026, 03:18
473,240
-117
31 Aug 2026, 05:56
473,357
-278
30 Aug 2026, 04:47
473,635
-200
29 Aug 2026, 04:08
473,835
-318
28 Aug 2026, 03:28
474,153
-51
27 Aug 2026, 00:35
474,204
-30
26 Aug 2026, 03:42
474,234
+364
25 Aug 2026, 04:17
473,870
-198
23 Aug 2026, 21:05
474,068
-388
22 Aug 2026, 05:58
474,456
-267
21 Aug 2026, 00:02
474,723
-161
19 Aug 2026, 23:23
474,884
-85
18 Aug 2026, 23:42
474,969
-144
17 Aug 2026, 23:24
475,113
-311
16 Aug 2026, 22:14
475,424
-465
15 Aug 2026, 15:37
475,889
first reading
Engagement
464 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 472,134 subscribers
Avg views / post
70,400
412 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
413
of 464 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
464 (4 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
28,997,680
Reactions total
307,007
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 02:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,200
Videos
≈7,720
Links
≈26,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 06m
Average length
1m 47s
Measured directly from 105 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
343,085 reactions across 451 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
123,187
35.9%
😐
107,503
31.3%
🙏
53,942
15.7%
💔
41,901
12.2%
🕊
16,552
4.82%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 463 of the 464 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353,095 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 464 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
579
across the posts below
Posts paid on
148
of 463 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
252
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mig41. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 464 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Продолжаем публикацию благодарностей, которых скопилось очень много, и так как люди настаивают, будем публиковать постоянно.
Громадное спасибо нашим дорогим читателям, благодаря им удается оказывать постоянную помощь (главное — лекарствами) пенсионерам, многодетным и семьям с особыми детьми, проживающим на Донбассе — представляете, как им тяжело в этих непростых условиях.
Спасибо вам громадное от тех, кому особенно…
Герой России, член Генсовета «Единой России» Владимир Сайбель: «Мы, фронтовики, вас не подведем и будем отстаивать ваши интересы»
«Нам, фронтовикам, дана уникальная возможность пойти на выборы именно благодаря позиции нашего Президента, Верховного Главнокомандующего. Глядя вам в глаза, честно могу заявить: мы, фронтовики, вас не подведем, будем отстаивать ваши интересы».
Любые политические споры, дискуссии и прогнозы не имеют смысла, если не учитывают главного фактора нашего времени.
А именно — искусственного интеллекта.
Архимеды нашего времени близки к получению той точки опоры, с помощью которой можно перевернуть Землю. Ну, или земную историю человечества.
В День освобождения Донбасса вместе с первым заместителем руководителя Администрации Президента России Сергеем Кириенко посетили военно-исторический музей в селе Дмитровка.
Это особое место встречи поколений - сюда приходят школьники, ветераны, поисковики и родственники погибших бойцов. Музей выполняет роль живого связующего звена между событиями 1943 года и сегодняшним днём.
Дмитровка - точка притяжения для тех, к…
Святыня, пронесённая по улицам Москвы, вернётся туда, где началась её история, — в Элисту.
Уже 10 сентября в столице Калмыкии состоится шествие в честь 80-летия Явления Христа Спасителя — события, произошедшего в Крестовоздвиженском храме города в 1946 году.
На вчерашнем Общемосковском крестном ходе священник и православный блогер Иоанн Попов пронёс нетленный деревянный крест, найденный при перезахоронении Семёна Б…
"Что касается самой дипломатии, то пока ожидаем телефонного разговора Путина и Трампа" — цитата из нашего вчерашнего материала в закрытом Клубе Единомышленников.
Думайте! 😊
Экзистенциален ли конфликт для Украины?
Мы так не думаем.
Да, там действительно есть люди с оружием, для которых идея "украинского мира" есть нечто серьезное, и они представляют из себя силу, с которой власть вынуждена считаться. Но они не являются субъектом исторического процесса.
Основная масса населения там, конечно, "болеет за ВСУ", но именно что "болеет", как на футболе. Жертвовать собой или даже имуществом р…
Победа близка — Песков
"Мы уверены, что победа (на Украине) очень близка. Мы очень уверены в нашем военном потенциале, в наших военных действиях, они проходят очень успешно", — сказал Песков на брифинге для журналистов в преддверии саммита БРИКС, организованном Sputnik.
Что тут можно сказать? Только одно. "Ура!"
⏺Подпишись: МИГ в telegram |🇷🇺 МИГ МAX на парковке ⏺
В современном мире обращать внимание на официальную риторику вообще не имеет смысла, за исключением особых случаев.
Смотреть надо на дела.
А дела говорят о том, что ни на какой компромисс лица, принимающие решения, пока не настроены. Ни в Москве, ни в Киеве.
Разве что на частичный.
И никакие США, которые давно уже не те, что были раньше, «продавить» этот компромисс не способны.
Министр иностранных дел говорит, никаких переговоров с нацистами, пресс-секретарь президента говорит, мы всегда открыты к переговорам (в том числе, вероятно, с нацистами). Эксперты по ТВ говорят, Россия ведёт очень хитрую дипломатически игру. Действительно, очень хитрую.
В Киеве обновили сигнализацию воздушной тревоги.
Звучит не менее жутко, чем голос из динамика в "Игре в кальмара".
⏺Подпишись: МИГ в telegram |🇷🇺 МИГ МAX на парковке ⏺
😐268❤32💔13🕊10🙏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 464 posts we hold for @mig41. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 464 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 279 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mig41 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@tsargradtv named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 10 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны @rvvoenkor · 1,460,756#1
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка" @yurasumy · 2,667,417#2
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
РОКОТ @surf_noise1 · 59,875 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Ilya Remeslo @ilya_remeslaw · 61,612 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Вестник Киберполиции России @cyberpolice_rus · 83,882 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Контора Пишет @Contora_Pishet · 93,374 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
AGDchan @Agdchan · 98,331 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Репортер Filatov @filatovcorr · 168,596 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Open Ukraine| Открытая Украина @OpenUkraine · 180,925 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Анастасия Кашеварова 🇷🇺 @akashevarova · 246,068 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Константин Двинский @Kdvinsky · 29,688 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Аврора @aurora_network · 30,484 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Hard Blog @Hard_Blog_Line · 83,672 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Borisenko Dmitriy @borisenkoD · 111,936 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Димитриев @russ_orientalist · 129,928 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Владлен Татарский @vladlentatarsky · 174,818 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
РПГ-27🇷🇺🇧🇾🇮🇷🇸🇿🇨🇳 @rpg_shootingnew · 30,978 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
Мадам Секретарь @madam_secretar · 35,950 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
Дмитрий Конаныхин 🇷🇺 @grishkafilippov · 35,948 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
Герань Цветущая ™ @geran231 · 76,888 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Юлия Витязева @vityzeva · 48,820 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Больная экономика @bolecon · 57,907 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Что делать? @chto_delat_2022 · 68,976 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
RIA_Kremlinpool @RIAKremlinpool · 68,178 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
BRIEF МИР @rusbri · 69,396 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Свидетели Байрактара @bayraktar1070 · 82,782 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 1,065 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Косовский, Глеб Юрьевич(ru.wikipedia.org) “…новую концепцию создания новых форм животных{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/mig41/1486|title=Майор и Генерал|publisher=Telegram|access-date=2018-03-…” read 23 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МИГ России” (@mig41), 472,134 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mig41.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.