Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
18 measurements spanning 18 days, net -293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,030–58,412 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 21:14
58,075
-16
22 Aug 2026, 07:45
58,091
+17
20 Aug 2026, 22:44
58,074
-55
19 Aug 2026, 19:48
58,129
-4
18 Aug 2026, 20:37
58,133
-31
17 Aug 2026, 20:16
58,164
-19
16 Aug 2026, 16:19
58,183
-9
14 Aug 2026, 21:24
58,192
-7
13 Aug 2026, 15:56
58,199
-31
12 Aug 2026, 13:47
58,230
-11
11 Aug 2026, 16:08
58,241
-23
10 Aug 2026, 15:15
58,264
-3
9 Aug 2026, 13:01
58,267
-25
8 Aug 2026, 13:51
58,292
-28
7 Aug 2026, 15:16
58,320
-31
6 Aug 2026, 16:05
58,351
-17
6 Aug 2026, 01:36
58,368
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:45
58,368
first reading
Engagement
141 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.72%
avg views ÷ 58,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,320
141 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
141
of 141 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 134 of 141 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held
141 (4 August 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total
468,504
Reactions total
6,624
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21m 22s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,071 reactions across 123 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,105
18.2%
🤬
988
16.3%
😁
680
11.2%
🤡
494
8.14%
🤔
472
7.77%
🤣
461
7.59%
👎
294
4.84%
💩
280
4.61%
🔥
267
4.40%
❤
261
4.30%
👏
138
2.27%
🤮
100
1.65%
🤷♂
89
1.47%
😱
75
1.24%
🤯
66
1.09%
💯
54
0.889%
💊
46
0.758%
🙈
33
0.544%
🥱
29
0.478%
✍
21
0.346%
19 further kinds
118
1.94%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,624reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Франция вышла на второе место в мире по экспорту оружия
Франция заняла 2-е место в мировом рейтинге экспортеров вооружений с долей 9,8% в 2021–2025 годах. США лидируют с 42%, а Россия опустилась на 3-е место с 6,8%.
Франция поставила вооружения 63 странам, крупнейшими покупателями стали Индия (24% экспорта), Египет (11%) и Греция (10%). В 2025 году Париж получил €21,2 млрд новых зарубежных заказов, основным экспорт…
Россия и Иран близки к соглашению по железной дороге Решт — Астара
Россия и Иран в ближайшее время могут подписать соглашение о реализации проекта железной дороги Решт — Астара, строительство которой будет осуществлять Азербайджан, сообщает IRNA.
Проект считается важной частью международного транспортного коридора «Север — Юг», который должен улучшить железнодорожное сообщение между Россией, Ираном и другими страна…
Космическая экономика может вырасти до $2,7 трлн к 2040 году
Мировая космическая экономика уже превышает $500 млрд, а к 2040 году может достичь $1–2,7 трлн. Значительную часть рынка может занять использование ресурсов Луны, астероидов и других небесных тел.
Добываемое сырье планируют использовать для строительства лунных баз, производства топлива и инфраструктуры, орбитальной логистики и генерации энергии. Ученые С…
Хакер сливший игру GTA 6 сжег свою крипту на 1.000.000$, чтобы доказать, что он не скамер. А мог бы просто задонатить замечательному каналу.
Хакер с ником CyberLeek заявил, что его цель — не деньги, а «протест против цифровых предзаказов и платных DLC». Однако уничтожение этой части монет лишь подогрело хайп, подняло курс токена и позволило ему ещё больше зарабатывать на торговых комиссиях от сделок игроков.
Затраты на высшее образования могут окупаться до 20 лет
В 2026 году год обучения на платном очном бакалавриате в России обходится в среднем в ₽225–245 тыс., а стоимость отдельных программ в ведущих вузах превышает ₽1 млн.
С учетом проживания, процентов по образовательному кредиту и упущенного заработка четырехлетняя IT-программа в московском вузе может стоить около ₽7,5 млн. При стартовой зарплате junior-разработчи…
Робот Honor пробежал 100 метров быстрее рекорда Усэйна Болта
На второй Олимпиаде роботов в Пекине робот компании Honor преодолел дистанцию 100 метров за 9,32 секунды, показав результат быстрее мирового рекорда Усэйна Болта — 9,58 секунды.
В соревнованиях участвуют более 2000 роботов из 16 стран, которые выступают в 30 дисциплинах, включая футбол, танцы и тяжёлую атлетику. Машины также соревнуются в имитации работы …
В ЕС предложили налог на сверхприбыль нефтяных компаний, доходы которых выросли на фоне войны на Ближнем Востоке.
Германия, Италия, Австрия, Польша, Португалия и Испания считают, что дополнительные доходы нефтяников должны частично возвращаться потребителям. При разработке механизма предлагают учесть опыт 2022 года, когда ЕС уже вводил аналогичный сбор с энергетических компаний.
Инициативу хотят обсудить на встрече…
Илон Маск: человекоподобные роботы смогут лечить людей лучше врачей
Я имею в виду, нас ждут действительно потрясающие вещи. Если у нас появятся человекоподобные роботы с очень высокой точностью движений и невероятным интеллектом, это будет означать, что каждый человек на Земле сможет получить медицинскую помощь лучше той, которая сегодня доступна даже самому богатому человеку в мире.
Кстати, если уж меня считают эт…
США могут лишиться права голоса в ООН из-за долгов
Администрация Дональда Трампа уведомила Конгресс о намерении перечислить ООН $725 млн в счет накопившегося долга, сообщает Reuters со ссылкой на Госдепартамент США.
Общая задолженность Вашингтона, по оценке ООН, превышает $4 млрд: около $2,04 млрд приходится на регулярный бюджет, $2,2 млрд — на миротворческие операции и еще $44 млн — на трибуналы.
Планируемая выпл…
СЕГОДНЯ СТАВЛЮ НА ФИНАЛ:
🇩🇪 БОРУССИЯ - БАВАРИЯ 🇩🇪
ПОСМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО ПРОГНОЗ БЕСПЛАТНО👇
https://t.me/+mu5glUjDXss1NTIy
👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @bolecon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 114,758 of 1,584,741entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@bolecon named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mellcasino named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
@razdevator named in 1 post, 23 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Наше всё @blackponed · 88,519 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
Топ Бизнес @top_biz · 106,020 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Больная экономика” (@bolecon), 58,075 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bolecon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.