Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Канал Бромберга

Channel

Канал Бромберга

@unclebromberg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,845subscribers

-534 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001368197880
TypeChannel
Username@unclebromberg
DescriptionПро инвестиции и финансы честно. Контент не является инвестиционной рекомендацией. Элитный чат @brombergchat Сотрудничество: @Ngalkins Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/unclebromberg
Created8 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held54
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/unclebromberg

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

22,84523,38223,113.56 August 2026 — 23,379 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,382 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,381 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,376 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,370 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,367 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,363 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,367 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,356 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,352 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,349 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,340 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,333 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,313 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,303 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,305 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,291 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,287 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,286 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,288 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,279 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,272 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,274 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,270 subscribers6 September 2026 — 23,253 subscribers9 September 2026 — 23,236 subscribers12 September 2026 — 23,214 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,200 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,191 subscribers17 September 2026 — 23,173 subscribers27 September 2026 — 23,104 subscribers4 October 2026 — 23,050 subscribers9 October 2026 — 23,017 subscribers13 October 2026 — 22,985 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,974 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,971 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,959 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,945 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,947 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,943 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,933 subscribers21 October 2026 — 22,921 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,916 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,913 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,904 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,900 subscribers26 October 2026 — 22,896 subscribers27 October 2026 — 22,890 subscribers29 October 2026 — 22,883 subscribers30 October 2026 — 22,875 subscribers31 October 2026 — 22,866 subscribers1 November 2026 — 22,860 subscribers2 November 2026 — 22,852 subscribers3 November 2026 — 22,845 subscribers6 August 20263 November 2026
54 measurements spanning 89 days, net -534. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,764–23,463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 08:4722,845-7
2 Nov 2026, 10:4522,852-8
1 Nov 2026, 07:1522,860-6
31 Oct 2026, 05:0022,866-9
30 Oct 2026, 03:0522,875-8
29 Oct 2026, 01:0922,883-7
27 Oct 2026, 23:4922,890-6
26 Oct 2026, 23:3122,896-4
25 Oct 2026, 22:2622,900-4
24 Oct 2026, 22:1422,904-9
24 Oct 2026, 00:3122,913-3
22 Oct 2026, 23:4922,916-5
21 Oct 2026, 20:0622,921-12
20 Oct 2026, 16:4122,933-10
19 Oct 2026, 14:3522,943-4
18 Oct 2026, 17:3022,947+2
17 Oct 2026, 20:4022,945-14
16 Oct 2026, 17:1622,959-12
15 Oct 2026, 18:4722,971-3
14 Oct 2026, 18:2722,974first reading

Engagement

234 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.03%
avg views ÷ 22,845 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,380
94 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 234 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held234 (30 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total129,395
Reactions total2,783
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 02:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,420
Videos
≈1,860
Links
≈3,210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 57m
Average length
3m 54s

Measured directly from 61 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,818 reactions across 232 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2,47636.3%
👍1,65724.3%
🔥1,26618.6%
❤6339.28%
🤝1582.32%
🤯1321.94%
🥰1201.76%
👏1081.58%
🤔660.968%
🤬490.719%
😱480.704%
👎360.528%
🤷‍♂350.513%
😢340.499%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 232 of the 234 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,818 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 234 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 232 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @unclebromberg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 234 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 09:32 UTC934 views29 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Что за пугливые пуси такие у талантливых журналистов? Меня всю жизнь в найме критиковали — это совершенно нормально, особенно если ты пашешь как вол среди идиотов или таких же небезразличных бедолаг. То немногое, из-за чего тебе реально хочется уволиться — угроза уголовного дела за причинение особо тяжких. Настолько хотелось дать в рыло поехавшим от чувства собственной важности чепушилам. Лично меня (лично меня) сп…

❤19👍10

3 Nov 2026, 07:42 UTC≈1,020 views22 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

А вот эти полоумные, что так радуются росту акций VK ($VKCO) на 87% на месяц, вообще умеет масштаб графиков переключать? Напомню, что в пике бумаги отечественного социальносетевого гиганта стоили ₽2350. Просто за 5 лет произошло скукоживание почти в 10 раз. При этом АБСОЛЮТНО НИКАКИХ новостей по VK для такого роста нет. Зато есть весёлое улюлюканье паствы про «порванные трусы шортистов». #актуальное

❤14👍7😁1

3 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC≈1,190 views61 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Ребят, не забываем голосовать за республиканцев на промежуточных выборах через Госуслуги, а то за демократов Спасибо от Сбера не дают. #шуткишутим

😁55👍6

2 Nov 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,340 views24 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Топ-менеджмент ФосАгро ($PHOR) рекомендовал промежуточные дивиденды в ₽309 на акцию из нераспределенной прибыли прошлых лет. Если утвердят, то получу ₽5562 грязными. Небольшой и приятный сюрприз, учитывая актуальное положение компании. #актуальное

🤝20🔥4

2 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC≈1,320 views19 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Почему-то инвестгуру очень любят козырять статусом квалифицированного инвестора, надувая свои розовые от пиздежа щёки, ведь для, этого нужно аж ₽24 млн на счету или сдавать сложный экзамен. У меня большое и доброе сердце, поэтому дам им лайфхак — если заплатить ₽2999 в месяц или держать ₽3 млн в Потанин-Банке, то можно «немного срезать углы». И не надо шаманить с оборотами, как это делают более сообразительные инве…

😁13🥰5❤1

2 Nov 2026, 05:29 UTC≈1,350 views44 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Этот парень был из тех, кто просто любит жизнь. #шуткишутим

😁44

1 Nov 2026, 21:28 UTC≈1,510 views33 reactionsread 4 November 2026

⚡ Минфин разработал законопроект о переводе пенсионных накоплений в программу долгосрочных сбережений, узнал РБК. Согласно проекту документа, пенсионные накопления (в том числе так называемых «молчунов», которыми сейчас управляет ВЭБ) будут автоматически конвертированы в программу долгосрочных сбережений (ПДС, запущена в 2024 году). #актуальное

🤯15🤔11👏5❤2

1 Nov 2026, 06:57 UTC≈1,580 views42 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Помните одного из команды коррекционных супергероев, который купил «инвестиционную студию» в жопе мира с ключами когда-то потом, хотя мог купить чуть ли не двушку в центре города? Это тот, что постоянно орёт про свою логичность и критическое мышление. У Лавандового Максимки новая потрясающая идея: взять кредит (средняя ставка ≈30% годовых) и бахнуть его на ОФЗ (доходность ≈16% годовых, если доживёшь до погашения). П…

😁36🔥6

31 Oct 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,590 views62 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Зашёл в магаз потратить дивиденды от наших нефтяников, а там безалкогольное пиво для развитых бегунов. С электролитами! Взял алкогольное и нефильтрованное для борцов гетеросексуалов с соседней полки. #маркетинг

😁45👍10🔥4❤3

31 Oct 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,670 views32 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

В сети хайпит видео из автосервиса, где показали импортозамещение Джили Бомжаро на нашу родимую Волга К50 с помощью... НАКЛЕЕК. Что же с ними будет, когда они узнают, что запчасти на Джили Волгу стоят дороже, чем на Вольво? #вродебыпроэкономику

😁14🔥11🤷‍♂7

30 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,740 views44 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Экономические новостные каналы пишут, что фондовый рынок США начал рушиться из-за краха ИИ-пузыря. Мы в России называем это обычный вторник. Недавно услышал любопытную мысль, что если рядовому российскому инвестору дать доступ к зарубежным активам, то он покажет чудеса кризис-менеджмента в отличие от местных непуганых пендосов. #вродебыпроэкономику

😁29👍12🤔3

30 Oct 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,600 views26 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Предупреждал же. Судя по визгу, лудоманов в бумагах МГКЛ много. Ребят, покупайте хорошие активы, плохие — не покупайте. #актуальное

😁17👍6🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 234 posts we hold for @unclebromberg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@unclebromberg edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 September 2026
Most recent edit
30 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @unclebromberg as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
24 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Кабинет инвестора
@investingcorp · 304,907
#1
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 461,619
#2
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 969,438
#3
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,029,071
#4
Деньги в банке
@bankser · 127,810
#5
Банкофф - Финансы
@bankoffo · 200,034
#6
bitkogan
@bitkogan · 257,641
#7
Сигналы РЦБ
@cbrstocks · 117,243
#8
Инвест ревью | Финансы
@investorbiz · 124,233
#9
ЗЛОЙ ФИНАНСИСТ 😡
@finpizdec · 54,374
#10
Инфляционный шок!
@inflation_shock · 39,795
#11
РынкиДеньгиВласть | РДВ
@AK47pfl · 114,618
#12
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 176,153
#13
Профита нет. А если найду?
@profitanet · 201,975
#14
bitkogan⚡️HOTLINE
@bitkogan_hotline · 82,929
#15
Сам ты инвестор!
@selfinvestor · 127,036
#16
Proeconomics
@proeconomics · 68,710
#17
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,976,206
#18
Банкста
@banksta · 439,420
#19
Mash
@mash · 3,144,752
#20
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,667,074
#21
Рублядоллар
@roubledollar · 25,865
#22
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 959,429
#23
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,735,295
#24
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 752,394
#25
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 429,832
#26
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,808
#27
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 340,290
#28
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 423,394
#29
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 666,321
#30
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,047,592
#31
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 490,778
#32
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 503,416
#33
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 488,021
#34
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 914,656
#35
МИГ России
@mig41 · 477,806
#36
headlines
@headlines_for_traders · 114,715
#37
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,009,962
#38
БП онлайн
@bponline · 111,496
#39
Мультипликатор
@multievan · 852,591
#40
Баррель черной икры
@banki_oil · 544,642
#41
Бочарик (ага, тот самый)
@botcharov · 209,446
#42
Win-Win
@victorstepanych · 155,456
#43
Образ будущего
@obrazbuduschego2 · 164,017
#44
Forbes Russia
@forbesrussia · 235,541
#45
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,546,539
#46
НЕЗЫГАРЬ
@russicaru · 419,703
#47
WarGonzo
@wargonzo · 739,194
#48
в IT и выйти
@techmedia · 1,342,998
#49
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 317,451
#50
Т-Инвестиции
@tb_invest_official · 522,436
#51
TrendWatching
@trendwatching24 · 1,385,329
#52
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,412
#53
Spydell_finance
@spydell_finance · 131,058
#54
Креатив со звездочкой
@creative · 133,594
#55
Zлой Пруф️
@proofzzz · 605,837
#56
Маркетинг нефильтрованный
@costperlead · 108,499
#57
Коммерсантъ
@kommersant · 295,031
#58
Кримсон Дайджест
@crimsondigest · 141,197
#59
Чёрный Лебедь
@swaneconomy · 140,438
#60
ZERGULIO
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 447,565
#61
Сладков+
@sladkov_plus · 694,802
#62
историк-алкоголик
@istrkalkglk · 123,415
#63
Дорогая Хурма
@expensive_hurma · 151,220
#64
Coin Post – Деньги, инвестиции, биткоин
@Coin_Post · 284,549
#65
Экономика
@economika · 146,038
#66
Мараховское время
@vmarahovsky · 60,549
#67
Геоэнергетика ИНФО
@geonrgru · 138,855
#68
Хазин
@khazinml · 242,256
#69
Орда
@orda_mordora · 161,413
#70
investify! Финансы
@ifinvest · 109,883
#71
НЕБАФФЕТТ
@thefinansist · 17,652
#72
Олег Царёв
@olegtsarov · 401,858
#73
КСТАТИ
@kstati_p · 235,465
#74
Angry Bonds
@angrybonds · 24,273
#75
Димитриев
@russ_orientalist · 129,442
#76
Это ещё не конец
@nonetutto · 142,129
#77
РБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 131,951
#78
Больная экономика
@bolecon · 54,679
#79
Голос Мордора
@golosmordora1 · 147,912
#80
СМАРТЛАБ
@smartlabnews · 76,459
#81
Китайская угроза
@economikal · 117,539
#82
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,558,680
#83
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 526,122
#84
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 331,327
#85
Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
@politjoystic · 250,518
#86
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 276,190
#87
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,690,620
#88
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 470,125
#89
Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition
@epoddubny · 569,002
#90
Александр Ходаковский
@aleksandr_skif · 313,828
#91
Саша Конь
@sashakon · 132,832
#92
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 181,332
#93
Китайский свяZноj
@prchand · 84,064
#94
BRIEFLY RU
@brieflyru · 100,403
#95

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Рублядоллар
@roubledollar · 25,865
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
Кабинет инвестора
@investingcorp · 304,907
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Канал Бромберга” (@unclebromberg), 22,845 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unclebromberg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.