Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
68 measurements spanning 45 days, net -1,176. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109,717–111,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 68
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 14:00
109,893
-10
18 Sept 2026, 13:37
109,903
-25
17 Sept 2026, 01:22
109,928
-22
16 Sept 2026, 06:55
109,950
-31
14 Sept 2026, 23:59
109,981
-19
14 Sept 2026, 11:02
110,000
-17
13 Sept 2026, 11:56
110,017
-26
12 Sept 2026, 18:18
110,043
-10
11 Sept 2026, 16:16
110,053
-18
10 Sept 2026, 17:37
110,071
-60
8 Sept 2026, 23:00
110,131
-37
7 Sept 2026, 15:38
110,168
-55
5 Sept 2026, 14:56
110,223
-24
4 Sept 2026, 17:58
110,247
-11
3 Sept 2026, 18:58
110,258
-28
3 Sept 2026, 02:08
110,286
-37
2 Sept 2026, 07:55
110,323
-9
1 Sept 2026, 23:25
110,332
-32
1 Sept 2026, 06:15
110,364
-9
31 Aug 2026, 21:15
110,373
first reading
Engagement
312 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.30%
avg views ÷ 109,893 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,020
170 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
171
of 312 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
312 (3 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
1,364,221
Reactions total
30,137
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 21:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,000
Videos
≈2,770
Links
≈3,350
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
32m 14s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 69 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
53,641 reactions across 309 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5269380970418564952
23,552
43.9%
❤
9,894
18.4%
custom 5283039675089457845
5,465
10.2%
custom 5384122018163629139
3,536
6.59%
custom 5300866228909273138
3,137
5.85%
custom 5267068392522675695
2,126
3.96%
custom 5269758437914342057
1,684
3.14%
custom 5276102306474010164
1,289
2.40%
custom 5193036131435839671
878
1.64%
😭
684
1.28%
custom 5201761920138382729
532
0.992%
custom 5242400638700134915
353
0.658%
custom 5359538291081249948
151
0.282%
custom 5192995964901687510
96
0.179%
custom 5224708023435404637
72
0.134%
custom 5429358555050318769
68
0.127%
custom 5474633441699978033
61
0.114%
🤣
31
0.058%
custom 5235601821434682344
21
0.039%
custom 5417952788359423425
11
0.021%
Custom emoji. 17 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 311 of the 312 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53,875 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 312 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 311 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @costperlead. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 312 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Организаторы концерта Канье Уэста признали поражение и впервые сообщили, что концерт может не состояться — деньги за билеты пообещали вернуть.
Мы прекрасно понимаем ваше беспокойство и переживания для многих из вас это не просто концерт: кто-то приобрёл невозвратные билеты, забронировал отели, спланировал поездку и многое другое.
Также агентство сообщило, что больше не будет преждевременно называть сроки и «публико…
У котов появилась реклама — энтузиасты создали ролик для кошек в духе Apple и покорили соцсети: в презентации представлены Mini, Pro, Pro Max и даже новейший Duo.
Про время без подзарядки снова наврали 😂
Converse начали отменять из-за рекламы, в которой увидели расизм. В соцсетях посчитали, что компания специально использовала образ… ку-клукс-клана, который якобы «повесил» человека рядом.
Это связали с тем, что в США за несколько лет нашли около 20 повешенных чернокожих — отсюда и «тайная поддержка бренда на фоне инфоповода».
Компании пришлось принести публичные извинения и удалить рекламу «везде, где она появилась…
Так выглядит «Влад зубная фея» из трека Gorillaz «Delirium» — фанаты нашли эту пасхалку ещё в марте и строили теории, что это может значить.
В итоге Владом оказался ассистент, который решает «нестандартные вопросики» — свое прозвище он получил после того, как лидер группы Деймон Албарн потерял зуб в ресторане, а Владу пришлось искать этот зуб в трех мусорных баках.
Загадку наконец-то рассекретили, а Влад вышел на с…
Директор «Белёвской пастилы» продолжает кошмарить блогеров — на этот раз он снял совместный рилс с дегустацией, а затем показал, почему нужно уважать пастилу.
Концовка убила (буквально), а Гай Ричи после этого шедевра курит в сторонке.
«Пох*й», — так ответил 91-летний скейтер Ллойд Кан своему врачу, который сказал, что в его возрасте лучше не кататься на скейте.
Сейчас он отлично себя чувствует, и его главный секрет — спорт. Он встал на скейт в (!) 65 лет, а до этого занимался бегом и серфингом. Ллойд заявляет, что жить нужно в гармонии с собой и делать то, что нравится.
Целый выпуск о нем сняла блогер Сьерра Кларк. Видео стало одним из самых поп…
Никиты по всей стране требуют официально ввести отчество Никитович и Никитовна для своих детей вместо Никитич и Никитична, пишет SHOT.
В ЗАГСах, как правило, отказывают, поэтому приходится писать заявление, мол это осознанный выбор, а не ошибка.
Главная причина — странное устаревшее звучание. В справочниках нормой является именно Никитич, поэтому правила и хотят поменять.
Артемовичи, вы следующие.
Музыкант Akon на своем выступлении в Бишкеке залез в огромный прозрачный шар и… буквально прошелся по фанатам.
В какой-то момент зрители случайно уронили артиста в толпу, и выступление пришлось прервать.
Хорошее шоу требует жертв 😂
Showing the 12 most recent of 312 posts we hold for @costperlead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@costperlead edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Москоуавто @moscowauto · 201,003 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
коллеги, не сутультесь @bardachko · 565,267 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Куб маркетинга @cubemark · 60,461 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Ты в тренде или уходи @trendsetter · 1,417,532 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
ок, согласовано @notypicmarketing · 342,096 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Сегодня в тренде @trends · 1,149,945 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
о чём говорят коллеги @kollegi · 207,939 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Трендач @trendach · 1,285,000 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Креатив со звездочкой @creative · 134,236 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
КудаМосква @kudamsk24 · 230,378 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Русский ритейл и бизнес @retailrus · 291,790 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Не баг, а фича @bugnotfeature · 1,045,696 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Марзаганов вещает @marzaganoff · 74,887 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
CodeCamp @codecamp · 181,400 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
в IT и выйти @techmedia · 1,460,193 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Магазин путешествий @magputru · 27,924 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 10 September 2026
Передали коллегам @collegi · 137,793 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Рублядоллар @roubledollar · 26,094 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
Артемий Лебедев @temalebedev · 968,245 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
TrendWatching @trendwatching24 · 1,446,765 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
Рестарт @remedia · 703,568 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
concertzaal @concertzaal · 835,965 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
Эксплойт @exploitex · 2,041,128 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 August 2026
бумеры смотрят телек @boomers_TV · 160,058 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 167 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маркетинг нефильтрованный” (@costperlead), 109,893 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/costperlead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
