📣 Разместите рекламу в этом канале — её увидят Аудитория Telegram остаётся активной, что бы ни говорили. Индекс читаемости это подтверждает: охваты каналов по тематикам держатся, люди продолжают читать. Реклама в Telegram — это законно: ФАС в 2026 году официально подтвердил, что она разрешена. 👉 Заказать размещение в этом канале можно через Telega.in — с маркировкой и закрывающими документами, за пару минут. Форм…

Channel
MDK
@mudak
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
537,877subscribers
-2,650 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001006147755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mudak |
| Description | Добро пожаловать в интернет! Реклама: @senyatret Биржа: https://telega.in/c/mudak Конкурс: @godblessmdk РКН: https://vk.cc/cIdF57 |
| Created | 27 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mudak |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 537,877 | -188 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 538,065 | -146 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 538,211 | -128 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 538,339 | -178 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 538,517 | -254 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 538,771 | -306 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 539,077 | -234 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 539,311 | -277 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 539,588 | -200 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 539,788 | -132 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 539,920 | -164 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 540,084 | -158 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 540,242 | -134 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 540,376 | -129 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 540,505 | -22 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 540,527 | first reading |
Engagement
214 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.69%
- avg views ÷ 537,877 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 30,600
- 214 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.797%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 214
- of 214 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 213 of 214 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 214 (5 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,554,370 |
| Reactions total | 52,193 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈50,800
- Videos
- ≈37,500
- Links
- ≈6,870
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 44m 56s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 76 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
49,556 reactions across 202 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 19,397 | 39.1% | |
| ❤ | 7,188 | 14.5% | |
| 🔥 | 4,015 | 8.10% | |
| custom 5208952292392313999 | 3,849 | 7.77% | |
| 👍 | 3,207 | 6.47% | |
| 🗿 | 3,023 | 6.10% | |
| 🤬 | 2,619 | 5.28% | |
| custom 5208771405549674655 | 2,340 | 4.72% | |
| 😭 | 2,190 | 4.42% | |
| 😱 | 1,173 | 2.37% | |
| 🌚 | 337 | 0.68% | |
| 🤝 | 99 | 0.2% | |
| 🤔 | 72 | 0.145% | |
| ⚡ | 47 | 0.095% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 213 of the 214 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52,193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 36
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 25
- of 214 we hold a reading for · 12%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mudak. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 214 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.34%
- 5 of 214 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 5
- posts carrying an erid · 5 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 27,900
- over 5 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 31,600
- over 209 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjcoiGkB | 1 | 18 August 2026 | 18 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqwcU93g | 1 | 5 August 2026 | 5 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGTB64H | 1 | 21 August 2026 | 21 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFHHjBmK | 1 | 21 August 2026 | 21 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJhGAKs | 1 | 12 August 2026 | 12 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
День Государственного флага Российской Федерации отмечается ежегодно 22 августа
custom 52089522923923139999👍7🗿3🤬3❤2
Так муравьи-ткачи строят гнёзда, стягивая вместе листья, используя шёлк, который делают их личинки, чтобы сшивать листья друг с другом А долму они смогут сделать?
😁26🔥19👍5❤2
Родители без разрешения купили своей дочке квартиру после выпускного, хотя та мечтала о вайбовой жизни в общаге Жалко маленькую?
😁171😭56🗿39custom 520895229239231399917❤7custom 52087714055496746553
Самому пожилому человеку на Земле сегодня исполнилось 117 лет — женщина родилась в 1909 году Вот её топ советов по долголетию: ▪️Не спорить с людьми. Выслушивайте собеседника, а потом всё равно делайте по-своему. ▪️Сохранять позитивный настрой. Женщина говорит, что именно из-за позитивного мышления так долго прожила. ▪️Оставаться активным. Умеренный спорт, прогулки, спортивные игры. ▪️Сохранять самостоятельность как…
❤112👍47🔥14custom 52087714055496746556🗿2⚡1
Telegram планирует добавить WEB-прокси, чтобы соединения можно было прятать под обычные сайты. Как работает: ▪️ Telegram Desktop открывает внутри мини-браузер и устанавливает обычное HTTPS/WebSocket-соединение с доменом, который выглядит как обычный сайт; ▪️Весь MTProxy-трафик прячется в один поток и передаётся через замаскированный веб-канал; ▪️На сервере промежуточный узел (relay) разбирает поток на отдельные с…
custom 5208771405549674655284🔥177👍62❤23custom 520895229239231399914
Netflix показали собственную версию Колобка — главную роль сыграл Снуп Дог Теперь можно смотреть
😁229🔥57❤12custom 52089522923923139996😭1
Девушка попросила восстановить портреты своих предков и вот что из этого вышло Получилось даже лучше, чем планировалось
😁326🗿21🔥13❤7custom 52089522923923139997custom 52087714055496746555
Когда зашёл в вакансии в 2026 году:
🗿61😁24custom 520895229239231399919❤11custom 52087714055496746554😭2
🎫 Билеты на Канье действительно есть Разыгрываем два билета на концерт Канье Уэста, который пройдет 10 октября. Оба билета достанутся одному победителю — останется только решить, кого взять с собой. Что нужно сделать: 🟠до 8 сентября успеть сделать покупку в Ситилинке любого товара на сумму от 2490 руб и в заказе применить промокод КАНЬЕ 🟠Подписаться на наш Telegram-канал. И всё. 10 сентября при помощи рандомайзер…
custom 520895229239231399932🗿14❤4custom 52087714055496746554🤬3
В Китае хайпят детские трудовые лагеря — школьников отправляют в сёла, где знакомят с ручным трудом. Дитяткам приходится ухаживать за свиньями, копать картошку, чистить кору деревьев и рубить дрова. Смартфоны и другие гаджеты у них отбирают. Если ребёнок не справляется, то его могут наказать и ограничить рацион питания, а если он молодец — может улучшить условия проживания. Цена вопроса около 120 тысяч рублей в мес…
🔥259❤46🗿28😁21custom 520877140554967465521custom 520895229239231399913
Что ни день, то новый слив по GTA VI: в этот раз показали езду на спорткаре по городу
😁47🔥19❤6🗿3custom 52089522923923139993custom 52087714055496746551
Showing the 12 most recent of 214 posts we hold for @mudak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 25,873 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 48 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Mdk_pr · 245,498235 posts@TESTECS
@testeksss · 114 postsГлавный политический
@glavpolit · 33,6368 postsРозыгрыши и итоги
@itogimos · 110,8485 postsМАРТЫНОВ
@martynov2021 · 209,6125 postsЦитатник «The Sopranos»
@sopranos_quote · 9014 postsКЛИШАС
@andreyklishas · 18,0873 postsВалентин Богданов
@valentinbogdanov · 40,7063 postsThe World Inform
@wdinform · 1,4053 postsDenisenko
@andenisenko · 1472 postsJoy
@evjbherifiuhrisub · 62 postsАндрей Медведев
@MedvedevVesti · 184,5722 postsПодгорнов.Экспертиза
@npodgornov · 13,2452 postsСОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,097,2272 postsУсманьLIVE
@usman48life · 2212 postsИлья Варламов
@varlamov · 238,3122 postsДруид
@wisedruidd · 59,3562 postsДом дракотиков
@arasiabook · 2111 postСубъективно, Гуров 🦈
@cybergurov · 2411 postFULLBLAST
@fullblast_one · 2941 postJust Juli
@i_just_juli · 7551 postАнтиДжокер
@leprus · 931 postЗаметки продакта
@productnotez · 1041 postВсе понемногу о том и этом🐝
@robertminosyan · 71 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@dvachannel · 937,860#1
@cbpub · 636,594#2
@Lepragram · 342,258#3
@ru4chan · 163,588#4
@why4ch · 1,058,196#5
@exploitex · 2,063,697#6
@rhymestg · 1,408,397#7
@moscowmap · 2,711,433#8
@Reddit · 163,263#9
@rozetked · 675,601#10
@novosti_efir · 4,013,481#11
@retra · 165,322#12
@nmshhub · 715,970#13
@whackdoor · 1,638,591#14
@ateobreaking · 646,955#15
@topor · 1,295,675#16
@temalebedev · 969,369#17
@uzmdk · 205,662#18
@stalin_gulag · 302,336#19
@trends · 1,101,924#20
@rhymesrim · 301,299#21
@klientvsprav · 1,082,443#22
@msk_live · 1,817,555#23
@ndnews24 · 271,585#24
@d_code · 385,265#25
@bankrollo · 452,187#26
@mdk_money · 12,648#27
@leoday · 5,512,720#28
@sale_caviar · 193,045#29
@media1337 · 1,177,751#30
@mash · 3,109,815#31
@ru2ch · 637,537#32
@bbbreaking · 1,971,898#33
@yaplakal · 423,019#34
@lentachold · 383,142#35
@wylsared · 1,076,375#36
@pekagame · 1,099,261#37
@oldlentach · 262,873#38
@ru2chvg · 180,966#39
@twitt_ota · 334,922#40
@cb_economics · 344,104#41
@shot_shot · 1,259,965#42
@moscowach · 4,302,477#43
@asupersharij · 1,664,485#44
@pikabu · 256,769#45
@meduzalive · 1,114,177#46
@cb_games · 384,354#47
@abuwtf · 195,753#48
@readovkanews · 2,013,693#49
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,611,078#50
@bloodysx · 1,154,553#51
@ejdailyru · 639,346#52
@banksta · 437,438#53
@kontext_channel · 829,800#54
@world_playstation · 308,726#55
@pravdadirty · 1,371,508#56
@boris_rozhin · 742,044#57
@luka_ebkov · 430,440#58
@yurasumy · 2,676,884#59
@nexta_live · 759,995#60
@rvvoenkor · 1,462,769#61
@paperpublic · 42,344#62
@nevzorovtv · 1,005,333#63
@lifeyt · 331,820#64
@marvel4 · 213,071#65
@biggeekru · 562,171#66
@petrovtel · 527,653#67
@yurydud · 840,583#68
@mashmoyka · 333,292#69
@truexanewsua · 3,123,796#70
@femalememes · 413,384#71
@video_dolboeba · 217,355#72
@jolybells · 359,422#73
@naebnet · 2,184,935#74
@rbc_news · 903,483#75
@pezduzalive · 374,592#76
@Romancev768 · 754,562#77
@mosguru · 3,214,710#78
@voina_belgorod_novosti · 1,153,051#79
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,147,547#80
@moscowplus · 1,207,472#81
@ikakprosto · 329,086#82
@ebobo_rus · 145,526#83
@bazabazon · 1,541,942#84
@rand2ch · 172,481#85
@varlamov_news · 1,052,477#86
@hamster_kombat · 21,799,908#87
@notcoin · 9,113,759#88
@sportsru · 449,201#89
@orl3nok · 10,247#90
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pofactam_tg · 123,701
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
@Scienceg · 94,746
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
@pognaliofficial · 143,121
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
@ru4chan · 163,588
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@ptencoff · 205,294
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@Lepragram · 342,258
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
@dvachannel · 937,860
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
@dobrayalenta · 65,780
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
@Reddit · 163,263
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@DrDzari · 269,499
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@NationGeographic · 327,268
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
@radiorecord · 68,074
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
@FactTG · 205,686
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@avansanebudet · 68,114
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@pro_vsse · 78,935
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 August 2026
@imehanik · 322,507
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@retra · 165,322
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@yaplakal · 423,019
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@cbpub · 636,594
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
@nourlnews · 60,520
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
@video_dolboeba · 217,355
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@sobaki_pesik_sobaka · 476,865
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@ca11_you · 142,752
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
@driverone · 463,294
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 239 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…(ранее) * {{url|http://vk.com/mudakoff}} * {{url|https://t.me/mudak|}} | коммерческий = да | тип = [[социальные медиа|социальное медиа]]…”
read 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MDK” (@mudak), 537,877 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mudak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.