Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 35 days, net -1,303. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144,605–146,298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 09:18
144,800
-151
7 Sept 2026, 02:58
144,951
-107
4 Sept 2026, 10:41
145,058
-60
2 Sept 2026, 20:54
145,118
-36
1 Sept 2026, 22:34
145,154
-47
31 Aug 2026, 23:36
145,201
-35
31 Aug 2026, 01:17
145,236
-58
30 Aug 2026, 00:45
145,294
-28
28 Aug 2026, 22:06
145,322
-14
27 Aug 2026, 23:52
145,336
+18
26 Aug 2026, 23:49
145,318
-48
26 Aug 2026, 02:03
145,366
-54
25 Aug 2026, 03:32
145,420
-47
23 Aug 2026, 18:49
145,467
-59
22 Aug 2026, 05:08
145,526
-23
20 Aug 2026, 17:57
145,549
-27
19 Aug 2026, 16:37
145,576
-30
18 Aug 2026, 16:05
145,606
-36
17 Aug 2026, 18:24
145,642
-25
16 Aug 2026, 18:03
145,667
first reading
Engagement
302 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.36%
avg views ÷ 144,800 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,320
238 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.886%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
238
of 302 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 237 of 238 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held
302 (5 August 2026 – 11 September 2026)
Views total
1,502,971
Reactions total
13,278
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Sept 2026, 05:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈23,100
Videos
≈15,000
Links
≈711
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 29m
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 147 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,560 reactions across 299 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,285
19.8%
😁
2,499
15.1%
🤣
2,038
12.3%
🤮
1,659
10.0%
🤡
1,442
8.71%
💩
1,102
6.65%
👍
1,014
6.12%
🔥
811
4.90%
💊
531
3.21%
👀
338
2.04%
🥴
265
1.60%
🤯
260
1.57%
👎
243
1.47%
😢
205
1.24%
💯
201
1.21%
🙈
128
0.773%
😍
111
0.67%
🤔
75
0.453%
👏
67
0.405%
🤷♂
65
0.393%
12 further kinds
221
1.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 299 of the 302 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,560 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 302 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 302 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ebobo_rus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 302 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Артемий Лебедев заявил, что осознанно выступает против брака и не советует молодым людям жениться, потому что «молодой парень женится не на женщине, а на государстве».
По его мнению, семейный кодекс имеет сильный перекос в сторону женщин: алименты после развода могут быть несправедливо высокими, а отец не имеет равного с матерью права на общение с ребёнком.
Лебедев считает, что нужно либо честно договариваться о су…
Евгения Понасенкова исключили из реестра иностранных агентов. Соответствующее распоряжение опубликовал Минюст РФ, указав причину — «утрата признаков иностранного агента».
Понасенков находился в списке с апреля 2022 года
Анна Семенович ответила на критику своего выступления в Норильске, где она пела «Восточные сказки». Артистка рассказала, что выступала в тяжёлых условиях из-за недобросовестной работы организаторов: не было мониторов, не работал микрофон, шёл дождь. По её словам, она могла вообще не выходить на сцену, но не оставила зрителей без песен. Поэтому Семенович считает, что заслуживает похвалы, а не хейта.
Также она прокомм…
Григорий Лепс высказался о мужчинах, которые судятся с бывшими за алименты. Он заявил: «Бывших семей не бывает». Эту цитату стоит раздать Кузе из «Универа», Даниле Козловскому и другим.
Showing the 12 most recent of 302 posts we hold for @ebobo_rus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 302 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
YOBAJUR @yobajur · 188,150 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Домньюз @telega_domnews · 33,881 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 3 September 2026
Pilip_plein @pilip_plein · 37,936 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
Светские хроники @SVETSKlE_HRONIKI · 133,555 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
ЯТХ @ytx_sex_public · 58,092 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
КУРЯТНИК @kurmedia · 31,746 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
Россия / Russia @russia · 34,557 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
Super.ru @SuperRu · 196,976 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Блокнот Старс @bloknot_star · 126,516 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
Иришка Чики-Пики и Ко. @Iriskaciki · 245,682 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
MDK Петербург @MDK_Petersburg · 26,831 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
VOBLA • новости @voina_belgorod_novosti · 1,134,180 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Starhit.ru @starhitru · 104,215 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Алёна, Блин! @neopra_blin · 154,947 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
eat.sleep.wear. @eatsleepwear · 88,483 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 17 August 2026
МАМАЕВА @alanamamaeva1 · 26,637 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 September 2026
Сад Сновидений @thedreamgarden · 33,559 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Администрация Аншлага @klaragavrilovnanews · 157,178 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
ЖЮ 📡 Новости | Мира и России @segodnyaju · 29,820 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Звездная пыль @starsdustpro · 29,452 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
Riddle @riddle_tg · 50,762 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
MDK @mudak · 534,556 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ebobo” (@ebobo_rus), 144,800 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebobo_rus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.