Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СЕЛЕБРИТИ

Channel

СЕЛЕБРИТИ

@selebrty

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,275subscribers

-93 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001974131053
TypeChannel
Username@selebrty
Created20 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/selebrty

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,15323,50523,3297 August 2026 — 23,368 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,363 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,351 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,346 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,337 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,326 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,310 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,309 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,296 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,279 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,270 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,263 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,255 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,243 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,236 subscribers23 August 2026 — 23,247 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,239 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,229 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,224 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,213 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,208 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,204 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,195 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,183 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,171 subscribers5 September 2026 — 23,153 subscribers8 September 2026 — 23,198 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,321 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,404 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,471 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,505 subscribers19 September 2026 — 23,498 subscribers25 September 2026 — 23,457 subscribers4 October 2026 — 23,380 subscribers8 October 2026 — 23,353 subscribers13 October 2026 — 23,344 subscribers14 October 2026 — 23,338 subscribers16 October 2026 — 23,337 subscribers17 October 2026 — 23,332 subscribers18 October 2026 — 23,320 subscribers19 October 2026 — 23,312 subscribers20 October 2026 — 23,310 subscribers21 October 2026 — 23,301 subscribers22 October 2026 — 23,296 subscribers23 October 2026 — 23,290 subscribers24 October 2026 — 23,283 subscribers25 October 2026 — 23,279 subscribers26 October 2026 — 23,275 subscribers23,2757 August 202626 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 80 days, net -93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,100–23,558 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 19:5923,275-4
25 Oct 2026, 17:3523,279-4
24 Oct 2026, 20:2123,283-7
23 Oct 2026, 20:0923,290-6
22 Oct 2026, 21:3623,296-5
21 Oct 2026, 20:1023,301-9
20 Oct 2026, 12:1423,310-2
19 Oct 2026, 15:4523,312-8
18 Oct 2026, 17:0423,320-12
17 Oct 2026, 14:1023,332-5
16 Oct 2026, 15:5523,337-1
14 Oct 2026, 10:3923,338-6
13 Oct 2026, 00:1623,344-9
8 Oct 2026, 15:5923,353-27
4 Oct 2026, 08:0123,380-77
25 Sept 2026, 18:3623,457-41
19 Sept 2026, 05:5723,498-7
16 Sept 2026, 19:4223,505+34
14 Sept 2026, 22:0123,471+67
13 Sept 2026, 10:5823,404first reading

Engagement

382 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.9%
avg views ÷ 23,275 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,030
157 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.328%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
157
of 382 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 156 of 157 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held382 (6 August 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total947,379
Reactions total3,111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Oct 2026, 00:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 40m
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 182 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,611 reactions across 379 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,80950.0%
👍5967.83%
😁4676.14%
🤮4385.75%
🔥3794.98%
🥴2543.34%
👎2483.26%
💔2483.26%
🤡2152.82%
😢1441.89%
🤣1021.34%
🕊861.13%
🙈861.13%
🥰831.09%
😱760.999%
😍500.657%
👀380.499%
🤷‍♀380.499%
💊310.407%
🤔310.407%
11 further kinds1922.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 379 of the 382 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,611 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 382 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 382 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @selebrty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 382 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.524%
2 of 382 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,130
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
7,170
over 380 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqxQ6YXd120 August 202620 August 2026
2W5zFJrmhpm130 August 202630 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 382 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Oct 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,600 views19 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

Павел Прилучный в новой фотосессии 📷 Мы в MAX и ВК.

🤮11❤8

23 Oct 2026, 14:16 UTC≈2,700 views11 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

Джессика Альба для Vogue Испания 🌹 Мы в MAX и ВК.

❤9👍2

23 Oct 2026, 12:13 UTC≈2,830 views45 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video

Кошмар! Я больше не хочу давать интервью... На церемонии «Люди года» в Москве произошёл неприятный эпизод, пока Митя Фомин давал интервью, журналистка вместе с оператором внезапно прервала беседу и умчалась к парковке – туда направлялась Юлия Савичева. Её первое появление на публике после развода стало для прессы «горячим» инфоповодом, и внимание моментально переключилось. Артист покинул мероприятие и бросил на ход…

👎41🤣4

23 Oct 2026, 10:21 UTC≈2,820 views14 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

💰 Бывший звукооператор Эминема Джозеф Стрендж признал вину в краже и продаже неизданных треков. Он работал с рэпером в 2007–2021 годах в студии в Ферндейле и имел доступ к материалам. В начале 2025 года сотрудники заметили слитые записи в сети, опознали снимок жёсткого диска из студии, и обратились в ФБР. У Стренджа при обыске нашли более 12 тысяч аудиофайлов и рукописные тексты Эминема. Похищенные материалы набрал…

🤬7😢5🤮2

23 Oct 2026, 08:22 UTC≈2,840 views21 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

Барбара Палвин поделилась новыми семейными фото❤️ Мы в MAX и ВК.

❤15👍4🤮2

23 Oct 2026, 06:21 UTC≈2,910 views12 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video

Когда осознаешь, что уже пятница, но все равно впереди ещё один рабочий день👀 *Анна Винтур посетила концерт Гарри Стайлса Мы в MAX и ВК.

😁12

21 Oct 2026, 06:33 UTC≈1,600 views4 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

Джейми Дорнан для журнала L'OFFICIEL, октябрь 2026 Мы в MAX и ВК.

❤4

20 Oct 2026, 19:32 UTC≈2,800 views12 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

Дженна Ортега о своей собаке Твигс💕 Пушистого друга она взяла из приюта в Ирландии во время съёмок второго сезона «Уэнсдэй». Имя ей дали потому, что во сне она похожа на «кучку веточек» (twigs). Дженна не раз говорила, что именно Твигс помогает ей справляться с кочевым образом жизни: «Возможность зайти куда-то и быть встреченной животным — это действительно замечательно». В интервью она также отмечала, что собака д…

❤9👍3

20 Oct 2026, 18:19 UTC≈2,870 views20 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

И без того худая Оксана Самойлова решила сбросить вес с помощью уколов 😮 Блогерша призналась, что после стресса набрала вес и хочет скинуть 4-6 килограмм. Как говорит Самойлова, самостоятельно вернуть прежнюю форму пока не получается. «Малейшая мысль, что мне не надо есть, сводит меня с ума. Я хочу жрать 24/7. И я ем. Не могу с этим бороться», - говорила она. Такой подход не поддерживаем и осуждаем.. Мы в MAX и В…

🤡18❤2

20 Oct 2026, 17:05 UTC≈2,900 views16 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

Валерия и Стас Пьеха вспомнили свой старый хит «Ты грустишь» и решили выпустить новую версию Как вам? ❤️ - мне нравится 👎🏻 - не нравится, чего-то бы новенького Мы в MAX и ВК.

❤11👏4👎1

20 Oct 2026, 15:25 UTC≈2,910 views16 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

Дуа Липа и Каллум Тернер посетили гала-вечер в честь премьеры оперы «Lincoln in the Bardo» в Метрополитен-опере в Нью-Йорке Мы в MAX и ВК.

❤12🤮4

20 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC≈2,930 views29 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

Шакира поделилась фотографиями с концерта в Бишкеке, Кыргызстан 📸 Мы в MAX и ВК.

❤25🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 382 posts we hold for @selebrty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Говорящая Тыква
@talking_pumpkin · 32,355
#1
ох
@theohdaily · 173,167
#2
Бабская курилка
@kureelka · 124,511
#3
vogue is my religion
@voguemr · 103,163
#4
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 380,793
#5
GIRL POWER | Блог о Моде и Саморазвитие
@viiggam · 5,875
#6
Сегодня так!
@girlzzstuff · 5,170
#7
Celebrity Top News
@celebritytopnews · 1,546
#8
FAME
@itsfamemedia · 6,630
#9
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,387
#10
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,393,577
#11
KOSTI
@kosti · 555,197
#12
НеМалахов
@nemalahov · 126,158
#13
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,439
#14
звездец какой-то
@etzvezdets · 63,548
#15
YOBAJUR
@yobajur · 186,174
#16
Светские хроники
@SVETSKlE_HRONIKI · 132,477
#17
FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 402,008
#18
Самые СЛИВки
@samye_slyvky · 52,106
#19
PEOPLETALK
@Peopletalkru · 182,959
#20
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 199,230
#21
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 3,943,902
#22
SHTOLL NEWS💋
@SHTOLLNEWS · 516,079
#23
Дом Знаменитостей
@thehouseofcelebs · 99,442
#24
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 300,590
#25
Каждой твари - кампари
@tvrkmpr · 22,687
#26
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 503,819
#27
Noomba
@noombaru · 14,748
#28
Super.ru
@SuperRu · 194,767
#29
Светский хроник
@svetskyhronik · 47,888
#30
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 430,492
#31
Тулуп Тутберидзе
@tuluptut · 38,549
#32
Бабка на лавке
@babkalavka · 68,603
#33
Алёна, Блин!
@neopra_blin · 152,218
#34
so sad so sеху
@welcometomyisland · 251,665
#35
СИНЬКА
@thynk · 69,575
#36
MUR
@fashion_mur · 206,283
#37
Девичник 💍
@girl_humor · 53,066
#38
STAN
@stanculturetg · 32,109
#39
Вентилятор
@fanforfans · 50,369
#40
ebobo
@ebobo_rus · 143,111
#41
YOUR WORLD | ТВОЙ МИР
@yourrworrlld · 15,499
#42
Саваничи 🇷🇺
@savanichi · 192,890
#43
VODA
@Avodonaeva · 144,567
#44
yes, please!
@ohfuckinglove · 9,122
#45
Светский интроверт
@svintrovert · 83,771
#46
СВЕЖЕСТИ
@svezhesti · 141,382
#47
Звездная пыль
@starsdustpro · 29,295
#48
Starhit.ru
@starhitru · 102,886
#49
ХАЛКУС
@kkhalkus · 114,632
#50
Russian Fox🇷🇺
@Russianfo · 6,218
#51
Скандалография
@skandalog · 1,569
#52
ФРОНТ РОУ
@frontroww · 45,498
#53
VOICE
@darkvoicemag · 45,528
#54
W H R
@whrmedia · 24,603
#55
Вы только гляньте
@tolkoglyante · 8,904
#56
eat.sleep.wear.
@eatsleepwear · 87,272
#57
Посольство Леди Гаги
@lgembassy · 8,022
#58
Lipa’s World
@dualipasworld · 4,443
#59
KARDASHIANS
@kardashianslive · 2,456
#60
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 102,315
#61
VOGUE IS MY RELIGION / goldvimr Грэмми Grammy
@goldvimr · 39,637
#62
Пусси во вкусе
@pussivovkuse · 16,358
#63
Принцесса Verandot
@princessaverandot · 54,437
#64
Звездная пыль
@stardustinspace · 3,942
#65
Звездач
@zvezdach_mag · 50,390
#66
fav by god
@favbygod · 7,757
#67
Mash
@mash · 3,149,712
#68
КК
@petrovtel · 544,448
#69
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,976,351
#70
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 924,504
#71
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,269,339
#72
Администрация Аншлага
@klaragavrilovnanews · 156,788
#73
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 751,975
#74
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 181,441
#75
Вера в курсе
@verochkavkurse · 38,607
#76
Любимый ВПШ 😮‍💨
@lyubimyivpsh · 142,549
#77
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 329,315
#78
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 486,044
#79
MOONLIGHT
@moonlightmoon18 · 5,946
#80
mean girls
@meangirls · 36,265
#81
Московская Хроника
@mosnews · 2,638,235
#82
Diana Live
@dianalivelive · 42,900
#83
Медиа хабалки
@MediaHabalki · 48,853
#84
angels space
@angels_spacee · 26,651
#85
Lana Del Rey
@lanadelreyru · 27,393
#86
coquette diary
@coquettediar · 20,888
#87

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

За кадром | кино и светская жизнь
@blogodel · 21,604
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 September 2026
В кадре | кино, звёзды и блогеры
@blogerstan · 20,799
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
Говорящая Тыква
@talking_pumpkin · 32,355
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СЕЛЕБРИТИ” (@selebrty), 23,275 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/selebrty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.