Channel
@frontroww
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,264subscribers
-715 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001596252337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @frontroww |
| Created | 5 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 39 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/frontroww |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 45,264 | -43 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 45,307 | -136 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 45,443 | -136 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 45,579 | -205 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 45,784 | +172 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 45,612 | -88 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 45,700 | -74 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 45,774 | -106 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 45,880 | -135 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:55 | 46,015 | +111 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 45,904 | +93 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 45,811 | +278 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:35 | 45,533 | -47 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 45,580 | -57 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 45,637 | -86 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 45,723 | +54 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 45,669 | +17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 45,652 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 45,669 | +38 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 45,631 | first reading |
373 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 137 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 158 of 159 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 373 (5 August 2026 – 14 October 2026) |
| Views total | 319,865 |
| Reactions total | 12,070 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 99 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28,899 reactions across 372 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17,966 | 62.2% | |
| custom 5312305504934981461 | 3,386 | 11.7% | |
| 😍 | 2,365 | 8.18% | |
| custom 5350277065985769309 | 2,005 | 6.94% | |
| 💔 | 994 | 3.44% | |
| 🏆 | 931 | 3.22% | |
| 👀 | 532 | 1.84% | |
| 🤯 | 460 | 1.59% | |
| 🤝 | 260 | 0.9% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 372 of the 373 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,899 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 373 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @frontroww. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 373 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Нет, редактор Яна не перестанет рассказывать вам о том, почему сумки MARGESHERWOOD обязаны занять место в каждом гардеробе Мы уже сами сбились со счёта, какой пост подряд посвящаем бренду, но, без шуток, в шкафу Яны уже поселились три их сумки (и это во многом заслуга Studio Slow с их отличным селектом бренда). Во время поездки в Париж мне удалось лично познакомиться с грядущей коллекцией и детально рассмотреть новы…
На открытии нового балетного сезона Парижской оперы Матье Блази дебютировал в роли автора сценических костюмов для постановки Rings of Saturn Креативный директор Chanel разработал образы для двух ведущих артистов балета — Юго Маршана и Жермена Луве, которым предстояло исполнить дуэт о братстве и взаимной поддержке. Сам гала-вечер прошёл во дворце Гарнье и включал не только Rings of Saturn, но и два других балета — V…
❤31custom 53502770659857693098😍5
Начинаем утро с новой съемки Хейли Бибер для Adanola в рамках их совместной коллекции Вдохновившись своими 12 годами занятий балетом, Хейли объединилась с брендом для создания капсулы из 24 предметов. В линейку войдут вязаные болеро, гетры, топы на запах и одежда для дома 🤍🩰 Коллекция поступит в продажу 15 октября — это мы ждем!
❤31👀20😍6custom 53502770659857693092
Итак, рассказываем ситуацию: как вы могли понять, в Париже шопинг у редакторов был более чем удачный и Маша заодно купила себе джинсы в темном дениме у COS В первую же носку я за счет каблуков стерла себе край и они продырявились. Вот я уже в Москве, а мысль, что испортила новые джинсы меня не отпускает Увидела пост-подборку у Unfash, что вообще-то так девчонки делают намеренно со своими вещами, чтобы было больше г…
custom 531230550493498146134😍18❤15💔7custom 53502770659857693093
Тэйт МакРэй на обложке W magazine — The New Originals. Как вы уже поняли, за фото отвечал все еще Юрген Теллер Вообще, выпуск приурочен к свежему синглу Тэйт, но в интервью она раскрывается более детально: 23-летняя поп-звезда рассказала о сложностях жизни под пристальным вниманием публики, своём масштабном туре Miss Possessive и стереотипах, с которыми столкнулась после совместного трека с Морганом Уолленом «Быть …
❤29custom 53502770659857693096
Глупо отрицать, что сейчас на индустрию влияют уже не только дизайнеры и глянцевые журналы. Инфлюенсеры, соцсети и маркетплейсы с каждым днем меняют правила игры С 28 по 30 сентября в Москве прошел четвертый BRICS+ Fashion Summit, который собрал экспертов из России и более чем 60 стран, включая Бразилию, Китай, Индию, Мексику, Малайзию, Белоруссию и Казахстан Мы посмотрели, какие темы поднимали в рамках мероприятия…
❤14custom 53123055049349814617custom 53502770659857693093
Анкета Роберта Паттинсона в британском журнале Bliss Magazine (2002) • Возраст: 15 лет • Откуда: Лондон • Знак зодиака: телец • Хобби: «Обожаю диджеить» • Любимая фраза для знакомства: «Ты веришь в любовь с первого взгляда или мне стоит пройти мимо тебя еще раз?» 😭 Последняя фраза, к слову, классический английский подкат (chat-up line), который задолго до появления дейтинг-приложений кочевал по подборкам самых бана…
❤49custom 53502770659857693097😍1
А мы, очевидно, наблюдаем за зарождением еще одного тренда: Balenciaga также представили в рамках новой коллекции такие «мягкие» пары кроссовок Кстати, сейчас в онлайне у них есть и похожие балетки. Пока не понимаем, насколько это решение комфортно в носке, но с собой брать однозначно удобно! #тренды@frontroww
❤22custom 53502770659857693098😍2
Утро начинаем с легендарных архивов за 2010 год: Ким и Кортни Кардашьян впервые спустились в нью-йоркское метро Кортни даже успела докопаться до одного парня, сидящего рядом, с расспросами: «Ты когда-нибудь кого-нибудь грабил?» Ладно, вполне ожидаемо.
❤75custom 535027706598576930913🏆6
В попытках восстановить режим после восьми перелетов и нескольких смен часовых поясов, Маша уже лежит в кровати и смотрит на новый дом Джулианны Мур Выбор актрисы пал на нью-йоркский район Вест-Виллидж, он же и появился на обложке ноябрьского номера Architectural Digest Оказывается, Мур любит модернизм и внимание к деталям, то ли вопрос обработки фото, то ли все-таки самой атмосферы, но пространство очень напоминае…
❤23😍6👀3custom 53123055049349814613
Вау! А мы совсем и забыли, что Нарния получит новую версию от Греты Гервиг Netflix представил первый постер фильма «Хроники Нарнии: Племянник чародея», режиссёром которого выступила Грета Гервиг Фэнтези выйдет в кинотеатрах 12 февраля 2027 года. В актёрский состав вошли Эмма Маки, Кэри Маллиган, Дэниел Крейг и Мэрил Стрип Трейлер ожидаем завтра! Источник: Variety
❤58🤯7custom 53502770659857693095custom 53123055049349814612
Блиц с Дженни Шмитт: работа с братьями Хованскими, Недели моды и планы на музыку Фэшн-инфлюенсерша Дженни Шмитт начинала карьеру в модельном бизнесе и работала в Азии, а теперь учится на дизайнера одежды, появляется на международных Неделях моды и пробует себя в музыке. Уже больше года за ее образы отвечает дуэт стилистов братьев Хованских, отношения с которыми, по словам Дженни, успели перерасти из профессиональных…
custom 535027706598576930916❤10custom 53123055049349814617😍3🏆1💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 373 posts we hold for @frontroww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 63 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФРОНТ РОУ” (@frontroww), 45,264 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frontroww.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.