Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
@velvet was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@visual held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026
Growth
119 measurements spanning 91 days, net +345,368. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 119
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 06:59
352,323
+345,561
4 Nov 2026, 16:09
6,762
-345,409
4 Nov 2026, 03:27
352,171
+352,128
3 Nov 2026, 08:46
43
-352,674
3 Nov 2026, 05:59
352,717
-1,273
2 Nov 2026, 09:10
353,990
+347,222
1 Nov 2026, 18:40
6,768
-347,338
1 Nov 2026, 11:36
354,106
+354,065
1 Nov 2026, 02:58
41
-355,760
30 Oct 2026, 16:06
355,801
+349,026
30 Oct 2026, 03:00
6,775
-350,407
29 Oct 2026, 14:37
357,182
-310
28 Oct 2026, 16:30
357,492
+357,450
28 Oct 2026, 02:28
42
-358,326
27 Oct 2026, 16:16
358,368
+351,587
27 Oct 2026, 06:29
6,781
-350,831
26 Oct 2026, 18:16
357,612
-773
25 Oct 2026, 15:05
358,385
-1,397
24 Oct 2026, 16:27
359,782
+352,991
24 Oct 2026, 10:49
6,791
first reading
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 10 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
177 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💘
72
40.7%
❤
47
26.6%
💔
36
20.3%
❤🔥
22
12.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2025 to 1 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итальянский Vogue (вольной интерпретаций съемки) сделал карточки-игрушки — специально ко дню знаний. Изучение фауны, сельского хозяйства, и предназначения разно-животной шерстки — кажется, это обычный урок природоведения :)) Для общего развития малышей и школьников — можно проводить такие визуальные опросы-минутки:
— Что делают из овечьей шерсти?
— Пальто от Burberry!
— А еще?
— Сапожки от Chanel!
Vogue Italia augu…
Архивные коллекции Alberta Ferretti — и картины Жан-Батиста Греза. На всех изображениях девушки в slip-dress — в условных «нижних» платьях — которые сама Альберта любила конструировать и причисляла к самому женственному предмету гардероба:
Возможно, из-за его силуэта — возможно — потому что оно намекает на секреты интимности…
Или еще один пример того, как зацепка на одной вещи, на одной ее функции — может создать б…
Неделя моды в Копенгагене. Модели на показе бренда Bonnetje — носили сумочки-вазочки из цветного стекла. Палитра повторяет палитру Моранди, который тоже любил рисовать вазочки — непрозрачные в тонкости материала — маслом по холсту. Нравится, что и на шоу — стеклышки в руках не делают настроение тонким и призрачным — стеклышки в руках очень честные и прямые. Ясность намерений в коллекции и строгих лицах (охраняющих до…
💔25💘17❤6❤🔥4
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @velvet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
HELLOAESTHÈTE @helloaesthete · 20,392 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 October 2026
пальцы в чернилах. @fetissia · 19,751 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚡️Velvet VPN › Доступно всё” (@velvet), 352,323 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/velvet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
