"Света советует": чтобы наша осень не была такой серой, собрала для вас свежую подборку от российских брендов!

Channel
Fresh Fashion
@fashion
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
135,781subscribers
-4,292 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001730860014 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @fashion @fashion_feeling |
| Description | Самые интересные и свежие новости из мира моды и не только! Автор самой крупной сетки телеграм каналов о моде: @outfits @russianmoda @anitagloss @style @dresses Сотрудничество: @agatamilonova |
| Created | 26 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 68 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fashion |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 135,781 | -103 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 135,884 | -91 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 135,975 | -114 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 136,089 | -80 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 136,169 | -73 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 136,242 | -68 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 136,310 | -45 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 136,355 | -110 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 136,465 | -47 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 136,512 | -182 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 136,694 | -108 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 136,802 | -253 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 137,055 | -76 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 137,131 | -111 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 137,242 | -29 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 137,271 | -109 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:44 | 137,380 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 137,388 | -91 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 137,479 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 137,481 | first reading |
Engagement
308 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.01%
- avg views ÷ 135,781 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,080
- 186 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 186
- of 308 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 308 (5 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 759,140 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈25,600
- Videos
- ≈4,040
- Links
- ≈1,920
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 38m 53s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 94 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.649%
- 2 of 308 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 3,750
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 4,330
- over 306 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjd1bWUB | 1 | 12 August 2026 | 12 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGFDU5o | 1 | 5 August 2026 | 5 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 308 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Бриллианты не всегда были символом вечной любви — эту идею во многом придумал маркетинг В 1947 году копирайтер Франчес Герети придумала для De Beers слоган «A Diamond Is Forever». Идея была гениально простой: бриллиант физически прочный и «вечный» — значит, он идеально подходит как метафора любви, брака и обязательств. Дальше рекламу связали с помолвкой настолько прочно, что бриллиантовое кольцо стало восприниматьс…
Собрала сериалы про сумасшедшую любовь, после которых хочется верить во что-то хорошее и светлое. Сохраняйте себе на случай, когда будет романтичное настроение 💋 ▪️Услышь меня — юность, первая любовь и ощущение, что ради одного человека можно пойти против всего мира. ▪️Наследники — богатая семья, невозможные отношения и максималистская любовь, в которую хочется верить, даже когда весь мир против. ▪️Выходи замуж за…
Советую завтра вам поспать подольше, а с утра накрутить волосы и быстренько сделать такую вот лёгкую причёску за пару минут ☕️ Мы в VK
Prada в новой коллекции будто возвращается к истокам. Получилась такая грубая женственность, которая свойственна бренду. Вернули обувь из архивов, добавили свои фирменные юбки и массивные силуэты. Ну ценителям бренда точно придётся по вкусу 😍 Я в Pinterest
Почему собаки становятся похожи на своих хозяев? Оказывается, это не только мемы из интернета. В исследовании 2004 года участникам показывали фотографии людей и собак, и они смогли правильно сопоставлять пары — причём особенно хорошо это работало с породистыми собаками. Учёные предположили, что дело скорее в выборе. Возможно, мы неосознанно тянемся к животным, которые уже чем-то напоминают нас. Позднее японское иссл…
Я к вам сегодня не с пустыми руками! У бренда YUDASHKIN вышла новая коллекция, в которой они решили переосмыслить осенний гардероб 🍂🍁 Здесь есть объемные пуховики в пыльно-розовом и голубом оттенках, кейпы, тренчи, накидки — верхняя одежда становится главным элементом образа, а не чем-то, под чем нужно спрятать все интересное. Отдельно я хочу выделить трикотаж. Это первая полноценная трикотажная линейка бренда. Вяз…
Этот видос буквально олицетворяет фразу: «день не перестаёт удивлять». Ржу! И смешно, и грустно 🤭 Мы в Max
Как понять свой типаж через персонажей, животных и предметы? Есть интересный способ разобраться в собственной внешности: не искать тех, на кого вы похожи, а смотреть, как сама внешность устроена. Например, сочетание массивного корпуса, тонких конечностей и вытянутой вертикали может напоминать оленя. А тот же принцип можно найти в героях кино. Так появляются неожиданные связи: олень напоминает скульптуру, она может…
Нашла классный ролик, как сделать необычную косу. Конечно, обладательницам длинных волос обязательно к проверке! 😍 Мы в Max
Девочки, ну мы ведь, или как? 🤭 Мы в Max
Обожаю эти постановочные съёмки от папарацци. Но, тем не менее, Белла выглядит просто роскошно в этих трендовых туфлях Saint Laurent. Мы в VK
Showing the 12 most recent of 308 posts we hold for @fashion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@DrewShop · 15,4233 posts𝐓𝐯 𝐌𝐨𝐨𝐝 🖤
@Tvvmood · 8,6153 postsAriana Grande | آریانا گرانده 🌸
@ArianaArmy · 6,4852 posts𝑯𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒚𝒘𝒐𝒐𝒅 𝑪𝒍𝒐𝒖𝒅
@HollywoodCloud · 34,6892 posts𝑲𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝑪𝒍𝒐𝒖𝒅 🎀
@KoreaCloud · 8,2682 posts𝗢𝗻𝗲𝗗𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 | واندایرکشن ݇-݈🖤
@OneDWorlds · 6,4282 postsThe Weeknd | دویکند
@TheWeekndCharts · 13,0342 postsHalsey | هالزی
@WhenHalsey · 7,2292 postsЖизнь в Алании/ТУРЦИЯ/НЕДВИЖИМОСТЬ
@alanyainlife · 231 postby SKOROKHODOVA
@by_skorokhodova · 2521 postmaking-remaking
@making_remaking · 5531 postШукаю модель Рівне💋
@Rivne_modeli · 4,7361 postفروکنندگان اسکوتر
@scooterinserters · 11,8931 postSHOP'оголик!
@SHOPogolikYa · 121 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@goldchihuahua · 91,479#1
@Buro247_ru · 25,677#2
@religion_vogue · 25,744#3
@alreadyfamous · 26,557#4
@outfits · 211,199#5
@fashion_mur · 208,487#6
@pravdadirty · 1,368,903#7
@style · 161,866#8
@sncmag · 301,518#9
@strelets_molodec · 355,464#10
@wearfeelings · 70,024#11
@ksbchk · 372,627#12
@devilwearshandm · 72,684#13
@spletni_tg · 187,774#14
@wfcru · 26,198#15
@Peopletalkru · 182,678#16
@theblueprintru · 96,067#17
@aleko_n17 · 104,218#18
@mamkina · 30,156#19
@drunkfashion · 40,044#20
@mukhinss · 55,055#21
@lifestylewhat · 46,126#22
@burimovasasha · 81,553#23
@budnigalliano · 27,853#24
@hotcouture · 23,007#25
@frontroww · 45,612#26
@fashiondnevnik · 26,418#27
@poorichgirl · 43,731#28
@kureelka · 124,870#29
@MinogarovaNews · 95,130#30
@copyme · 26,865#31
@bird_doesnt_doze · 24,103#32
@northitaly · 29,092#33
@nady_fashionfaculty · 8,799#34
@editorsonvacation · 20,352#35
@styledbysmo · 38,718#36
@rogov_news · 31,060#37
@zlayakiska · 73,280#38
@imnotbozhena · 504,326#39
@glamoramablog · 28,837#40
@dressedto · 41,678#41
@superficialspacecadet · 24,701#42
@kseniadenisovna · 33,821#43
@WorldStreetFashion · 8,399#44
@voguemr · 104,688#45
@kkhalkus · 110,315#46
@tdmood · 21,678#47
@marinagolomazdina · 120,608#48
@straightface · 21,113#49
@nigaykarina · 95,277#50
@thynk · 70,798#51
@girl_who · 79,891#52
@thehouseofcelebs · 100,277#53
@cultdress · 18,757#54
@viiggam · 6,060#55
@anitagloss · 26,753#56
@arbuzimargiela · 20,431#57
@russianmoda · 194,533#58
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141#59
@zashmot · 107,495#60
@bloodysx · 1,158,879#61
@rogov24 · 189,541#62
@moscowmap · 2,674,200#63
@theblueprintnews · 72,402#64
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693#65
@myhotelki · 48,559#66
@mash · 3,096,804#67
@moscowach · 4,111,005#68
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005#69
@omanko · 114,097#70
@meduzalive · 1,121,201#71
@etoznakmag · 636,947#72
@istominakarina · 157,537#73
@pechenuwki · 34,394#74
@azalial · 42,554#75
@tatlersheroine · 100,724#76
@moscowtinderr · 740,982#77
@evkasup13 · 103,801#78
@moskvichka_mag · 102,398#79
@shipilovaks · 46,907#80
@misvia · 13,274#81
@goshakartsev · 88,841#82
@korolevatsvetaeva · 27,766#83
@ksenia_solovieva · 52,010#84
@limestorecom · 93,482#85
@veronikastepanova20011 · 474,884#86
@sale_caviar · 192,936#87
@irena_ponaroshku · 282,390#88
@vrednayamoda · 188,661#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wfcru · 26,198
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
@alreadyfamous · 26,557
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
@anitagloss · 26,753
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 September 2026
@outfits · 211,199
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@ShopahoLee · 44,464
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@style · 161,866
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@dresses · 50,325
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 August 2026
@russianmoda · 194,533
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@myhotelki · 48,559
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
@mosfweek · 21,718
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
@istorikmod · 25,988
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fresh Fashion” (@fashion), 135,781 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.