Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КАРИНА НИГАЙ

Channel

КАРИНА НИГАЙ

@nigaykarina

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

91,001subscribers

-3,086 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001407473249
TypeChannel
Username@nigaykarina
DescriptionМодный клуб для избранных Реклама: [email protected] Регистрация канала: https://clck.ru/3GNrF5
Created28 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nigaykarina

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

91,00197,81794,4097 August 20268 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net -3,086. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89,979–98,839 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 06:0191,001-61
6 Nov 2026, 21:5591,062-50
5 Nov 2026, 21:0691,112-88
4 Nov 2026, 17:4891,200-67
3 Nov 2026, 19:2891,267-76
2 Nov 2026, 18:2891,343-71
1 Nov 2026, 15:3991,414-59
31 Oct 2026, 15:0691,473-28
30 Oct 2026, 18:3891,501-301
29 Oct 2026, 16:2191,802-58
28 Oct 2026, 16:4791,860-76
27 Oct 2026, 19:2891,936-90
26 Oct 2026, 18:0892,026-41
25 Oct 2026, 19:0792,067-49
24 Oct 2026, 22:3792,116-46
23 Oct 2026, 23:3492,162-80
22 Oct 2026, 23:2992,242-76
21 Oct 2026, 20:4192,318-80
20 Oct 2026, 14:0892,398-47
19 Oct 2026, 12:4692,445first reading

Engagement

107 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 91,001 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,900
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 107 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held107 (20 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total430,270
Reactions total6,589
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈12,100
Videos
≈827
Links
≈783

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 07m
Average length
4m 28s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

25,940 reactions across 103 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10,57340.8%
🔥7,63929.4%
👍7,13227.5%
❤‍🔥3161.22%
🤩1090.42%
🥰700.27%
💘650.251%
💔360.139%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,940 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 103 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nigaykarina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 107 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.935%
1 of 107 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,880
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
21,700
over 102 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjcrP8tb131 August 202631 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (3.70%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC≈2,600 views221 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ну что, девочки? Отсчет до нового года уже пошел 🎄 Я вот вдохновляюсь декором, пока до конца еще не определилась.. в прошлом году мою ёлку захейтили.. как ее только не обозвали 😅 Вы уже на какой стадии? Готовы ставить?

🔥79❤73👍68💘1

6 Nov 2026, 13:50 UTC≈3,320 views261 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Пиччоли покинул Balenciaga.. я сильно не удивилась, НО главный вопрос здесь, чего от него вообще ждали? Вчера Kering официально объявил о его уходе, он возглавил дом в июле 2025-го — вся история продлилась около 16 месяцев. Сегодня уже объявили нового креативного директора — Мартин Роуз И вот где у меня картинка перестает складываться.. Назначение Пиччоли изначально выглядело понятным: после Демны дому предложили…

👍96❤90🔥71💘4

5 Nov 2026, 16:55 UTC≈23,300 views238 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ну что, Met Gala 2027 официально объявила тему! И, кажется, нас ждёт одна из самых интересных красных дорожек за последние годы extraORDINARY: Fashion and the Poetics of the Everyday — «Необыкновенное: мода и поэтика повседневности» Похоже в следующем году в центре внимания окажутся обычные джинсы, футболки, худи и тренчи.. но не спешите доставать любимые Levi’s 😂 Идея в том, чтобы показать, как самые привычные ве…

❤126🔥111👍1

4 Nov 2026, 15:16 UTC≈3,300 views233 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

2026 год, ты вообще кого-нибудь пощадишь? Российские бренды уходят один за другим, а теперь новости о закрытии приходят и из Парижа.. Coperni прекращает работу Кто не знает о них, те самые, что распылили платье прямо на Белле Хадид и заставили весь интернет обсуждать моду.. Бренд умел делать из показа событие, а из сумки объект желания Основатели сообщили, что несколько месяцев пытались спасти компанию и разрешить…

❤101🔥72👍60

3 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC≈3,950 views213 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Знаете, чего бы мне хотелось? Чтобы звёзды на красной дорожке уже показывали, как НАДО одеваться Посмотрела выходы CFDA, и вопросов у меня больше, чем красивых образов. Ну вот как на таком мероприятии может быть больше силуэтов, в которых теряется человек? Много вещей странной посадки, непонятных фактур.. ааааа.. могу просто продолжать и продолжать.. Жёлтое пушистое платье.. мой кошмар наяву.. тут и объём, и сетка …

❤124❤‍🔥86🤩3

2 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC≈19,200 views254 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

На манеже всё те же! 😂 У меня ощущение, что каждый год мы обсуждаем одних и тех же героев Хэллоуина, только костюмы меняются. Ну что, пройдёмся по любимчикам? Я уже приготовила оценки! 👑 Хайди Клум — королева ночи, бала и вообще всея Хэллоуина! Интересно, её когда-нибудь вообще возможно победить в этой номинации? В этом году женщина буквально превратилась в собственную оторванную руку. Я уже боюсь представить, что …

❤‍🔥79👍54🤩53🥰49❤19

30 Oct 2026, 17:46 UTC≈21,400 views280 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Месть — блюдо, которое подают холодным, а иногда ещё и под любимые песни бывшего 😂 Помните Кристи Сарах? Ту самую блогершу-миллионницу, которая снимала идеальные семейные видео с мужем? В конце прошлого года после 12 лет брака она подала на развод из-за измены супруга А на днях её застали за поцелуями с певцом Брайсоном Тиллером.. и всё бы ничего, но, по словам фанатов, это ЛЮБИМЫЙ ИСПОЛНИТЕЛЬ ЕЁ БЫВШЕГО МУЖА ШАХ …

❤117🔥88👍74🤩1

28 Oct 2026, 13:15 UTC≈4,870 views222 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Мир моды штормит не по-детски.. так, что, кажется, даже сами модные дома уже не успевают следить за происходящим 😂 Смотрю на новый Lyst Index за третий квартал, и тут буквально всё смешалось Prada одним махом +5 позиций и снова на первом месте.. Gucci уже четвёртый, Celine тоже прибавляет пять строчек, а вот Dior продолжает скатываться вниз.. и The Row уже на 14-м месте, кажется, все немного наигрались в тихую роск…

❤94👍67🔥60🤩1

27 Oct 2026, 16:21 UTC≈22,900 views246 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Откуда бы вы ушли, если бы у вас были деньги? Сейчас какой-то глобальный тренд на финансовую грамотность и независимость в этом плане.. Приведу примеры.. из отношений, которые давно себя изжили? с работы, на которой вы не то что каждый понедельник мечтаете о пятнице, а вообще, желательно, не приходить? а может, вообще из города, в котором живёте просто потому, что так сложилось? Я тут задумалась, сколько всего мы …

❤116👍72🔥58

26 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTC≈22,900 views242 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

РАСШИФРОВКА 🖤 1. ИМПЕРАТРИЦА 👸 Деньги, красота и удовольствие от жизни. Вы входите в период, когда пора перестать экономить на себе — причём не только финансово, но и эмоционально. Карта обещает рост, новые возможности и внимание окружающих. Возможно, вы наконец получите то, ради чего так долго работали. 2. БАШНЯ ⚡️ Кажется, судьба готовит вам неожиданный поворот. Что-то, за что вы долго держались, может внезапно…

🔥91❤83👍68

26 Oct 2026, 17:53 UTC≈20,600 views213 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

ДЕВОЧКИ, ВРЕМЯ НЕМНОГО ПОВЕДЬМИТЬ 🔮 Хэллоуин уже близко, а значит, официально разрешаю нам немного магии Говорят, в это время завеса между мирами становится тоньше.. ну что, проверим, какие сюрпризы приготовила нам судьба до конца года? Перед вами 6 карт, выберите одну интуитивно.. ничего не анализируйте, просто ту, к которой первой потянуло А теперь смотрим, что выпало ⬇️

❤84👍69🔥60

24 Oct 2026, 15:38 UTC≈21,400 views237 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Итак девочки, делюсь своими прям рабочими бьюти-штучками У меня их накопилась уже приличная коллекция, но сегодня делюсь теми, которыми действительно пользуюсь постоянно! 1. Колючий массажный мяч — база и моя утренняя находка! Массирую шею, плечи и зону ключиц, особенно когда хочется быстрее избавиться от отёчности.. как вам первый номер в списке? 2. Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro — один из самых любимых гаджетов для …

👍88❤78🔥68🤩3

Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @nigaykarina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @nigaykarina as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
24 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
46 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 349,000
#1
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 299,850
#2
KAKDELA
@mariakakdela · 94,745
#3
A L E K Ó
@aleko_n17 · 101,629
#4
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,623,740
#5
Sasha Burimova
@burimovasasha · 80,371
#6
Marianna Eliseeva
@mariannaeliseeva · 94,562
#7
PEOPLETALK
@Peopletalkru · 183,290
#8
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,041
#9
IdaGalich
@GALICH_onok · 279,156
#10
Бедная Богатая девочка💸
@poorichgirl · 41,599
#11
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 156,615
#12
Ксения Бородина
@borodylia0803 · 894,864
#13
MMARGO
@mmargosavchuk · 116,493
#14
FuckYourStyle
@FuckYourStyleAndYourOpinion · 8,923
#15
Shatilova
@shatilova_liza · 71,780
#16
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 279,288
#17
V I V A L A V I K A
@Viva_la_vika · 43,148
#18
GLAMORAMA
@glamoramablog · 28,811
#19
Дневник Лауры Д
@Lauradjagadiary · 75,540
#20
evkasup
@evkasup13 · 101,998
#21
Azalia L/ stylist
@azalial · 42,538
#22
Vrednayamoda / Вредная Мода
@vrednayamoda · 208,121
#23
NADIN NADIN
@NADIN_NADINEE · 245,585
#24
Inside out with Irma
@irmadaily · 26,162
#25
Fashion dnevnik
@fashiondnevnik · 25,968
#26
Super.ru
@SuperRu · 193,696
#27
STREET FASHION
@WorldStreetFashion · 8,213
#28
Чувства Wearующих
@wearfeelings · 69,591
#29
Бабская курилка
@kureelka · 124,144
#30
Эстетический маньяк
@elizabethbelaya · 20,506
#31
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 121,704
#32
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,242
#33
Стильный Сырник
@mariemets · 23,030
#34
что ношу, куда хожу
@dana_manasir · 27,776
#35
Karina Kasparyants
@karinaVIP · 165,699
#36
BYEVA 🧚🏻‍♂️
@byeva · 26,160
#37
В женской шкуре
@elya_bulochka · 48,310
#38
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 503,413
#39
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 102,568
#40
Лиза Рудкевич
@liza_rudkevich · 39,269
#41
MITYAGINA | VISUAL
@likebymitty · 6,350
#42
MUR
@fashion_mur · 205,344
#43
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,770
#44
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,173,202
#45
Mash
@mash · 3,142,084
#46
ROGOV
@rogov24 · 184,734
#47
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,837
#48
Kseniya Shipilova
@shipilovaks · 46,479
#49
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 381,490
#50
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,059,172
#51
ШМОТ
@zashmot · 105,449
#52
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 746,083
#53
The Blueprint News
@theblueprintnews · 72,379
#54
Outfits
@outfits · 204,129
#55
YOBAJUR
@yobajur · 185,477
#56
LIMÉ
@limestorecom · 93,914
#57
Дьявол носит H&M
@devilwearshandm · 71,890
#58
KALASHNIKOVA
@MariStyleee · 11,706
#59
Мамкина модница
@mamkina · 29,821
#60
POZH and the city
@po_zhelez · 10,401
#61
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,538
#62
Elena Bogdanovich
@bogdanovich_elena · 115,908
#63
Роскошь бутиков
@zhidkovskiy_beauty · 149,952
#64
OK! Russia
@okmagazine · 6,813
#65
SASHA BELAIR
@ab_chat · 134,779
#66
Осторожно, Москва
@ostorozhno_moskva · 396,512
#67
PROHODA
@prohodaaaa · 8,153
#68
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 485,626
#69
Виктория Боня
@bonyaviktorya · 612,300
#70
KSUSHA SMO
@styledbysmo · 38,657
#71
Lena Perminova
@lenaperminova_official · 77,629
#72
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 566,678
#73
Журнал «Москвичка»
@moskvichka_mag · 104,417
#74
LINADEMBIKOVA
@linadembikova · 13,145
#75

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tatoshe4ka•Life•Style
@Lady_etiquette · 121,661
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Anyuta_Rai
@anyuta_rai_channel · 28,821
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Все мы любим Мамбу, и Серёжа тоже!
@serezhalovemamba · 26,965
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
❣️Botanovna пишет❣️
@botanovnalevda · 92,191
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 August 2026
A L E K Ó
@aleko_n17 · 101,629
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Виктория Демидова
@demivikademivika · 34,129
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
Chek_Fit
@chek_fit · 53,017
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Крис Швец | женщина со вкусом
@kris_shvetch · 24,044
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 25 September 2026
Виктория Соловьёва | стилист
@victoria_solovyeva8 · 21,506
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 September 2026
Style
@style · 155,347
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Katya Golden
@katya_golden · 105,965
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
Inside out with Irma
@irmadaily · 26,162
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 September 2026
KRISTI THE ONE ❤️
@dudkovi · 98,017
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026
NADIN NADIN
@NADIN_NADINEE · 245,585
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
Эстетический маньяк
@elizabethbelaya · 20,506
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 September 2026
Fresh Fashion
@fashion · 131,945
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
YA DOMA 🧺
@ya_woman_project · 24,156
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 September 2026
The ARTICLE / Искусство ближе
@the_article_about_art · 27,539
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
Victoria Portfolio
@victoriaportfolio · 25,004
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 September 2026
Твоя Филатова✌🏽
@marinafilatovaaa · 46,836
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
Marianna Eliseeva
@mariannaeliseeva · 94,562
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
STREET STYLE | Всё о стиле
@streetstyle_looks · 31,551
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 September 2026
KAKDELA
@mariakakdela · 94,745
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
Lavrova Pro Style
@lavrovaprostyle · 26,652
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 52 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КАРИНА НИГАЙ” (@nigaykarina), 91,001 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nigaykarina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.