Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -15,986. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 912,852–933,634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 23:59
915,250
-822
15 Sept 2026, 00:41
916,072
-591
13 Sept 2026, 11:37
916,663
-575
11 Sept 2026, 12:58
917,238
-1,092
8 Sept 2026, 18:40
918,330
-1,300
5 Sept 2026, 11:18
919,630
-673
3 Sept 2026, 11:59
920,303
-659
2 Sept 2026, 03:47
920,962
-329
1 Sept 2026, 06:17
921,291
-290
31 Aug 2026, 09:46
921,581
-350
30 Aug 2026, 12:54
921,931
-351
29 Aug 2026, 10:17
922,282
-450
28 Aug 2026, 07:04
922,732
-412
27 Aug 2026, 07:24
923,144
-453
26 Aug 2026, 08:04
923,597
-354
25 Aug 2026, 09:07
923,951
-525
24 Aug 2026, 06:13
924,476
-526
22 Aug 2026, 16:25
925,002
-530
21 Aug 2026, 08:23
925,532
-458
20 Aug 2026, 09:12
925,990
first reading
Engagement
176 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.57%
avg views ÷ 915,250 subscribers
Avg views / post
51,000
118 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
118
of 176 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held
176 (4 August 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total
6,019,600
Reactions total
87,098
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Sept 2026, 17:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,150
Videos
≈3,420
Links
≈474
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
52m 45s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 93 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
4 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 9,504 interp. → 3.0 hours: 18,400 → 6.0 hours: 26,300 → 12 hours: 30,000still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
4.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
123,734 reactions across 175 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
63,032
50.9%
🤣
14,193
11.5%
🔥
13,401
10.8%
👍
8,582
6.94%
😁
4,406
3.56%
😍
3,577
2.89%
💯
2,218
1.79%
🙏
1,934
1.56%
🙈
1,402
1.13%
👏
1,392
1.12%
🤯
1,360
1.10%
😱
1,029
0.832%
🗿
1,021
0.825%
❤🔥
1,013
0.819%
👌
549
0.444%
😭
455
0.368%
🥰
438
0.354%
🤩
382
0.309%
🕊
357
0.289%
🤗
313
0.253%
19 further kinds
2,680
2.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 176 of the 176 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124,469 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 176 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
98
across the posts below
Posts paid on
56
of 176 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @borodylia0803. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 176 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 18 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.568%
1 of 176 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
49,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
53,200
over 175 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqv9s5uV
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 176 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 18 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Что посмотреть? 🍿
Собрала для вас #кинонавыходные
«Осколки», 18+
1981 год, Лос-Анджелес, элитная частная школа, красивые подростки, вечеринки, интриги и загадочный новый ученик.
«Бегущая», 16+
Свежий триллер с Галь Гадот, если хочется чего-то динамичного.
Чтобы спасти ребенка, ей приходится бежать через весь Лондон и выполнять указания неизвестного.
«В поисках Эмили»
Оуэн знакомится с девушкой своей мечты, но полу…
Девочки, а вы любите СПА?
Нас с Кариной медом не корми, дай баньку, хаммам, бассейны и ароматерапию 😂🔥
Сходили на открытие нового wellness-комплекса Тенгри в Москве и, кажется, нашли еще одно место, где можно хорошо провести время.
Там сразу хочется замедлиться, есть бассейны, банные пространства, хаммам, теплый пар, арома-баня, хаммам с нефритовым ложем и баня в русском стиле с шоу-парением.
А еще здесь делают СПА-п…
Скучная жена - горе в семье 🤣🤣🤣 Согласны?
Еще немного и уговорю Колю тик-токи снимать, а вы пока подписывайтесь https://www.tiktok.com/@ksusha.borodina
В соцсетях завирусилось видео, на котором девушка выхватила у другой букет невесты и вприпрыжку убежала 😳💐
Автор видео рассказывает, что вместе с такой же замужней подругой они специально отошли подальше от компании незамужних девушек. И вот в момент, когда невеста бросила букет, он каким-то чудом прилетел прямо в руки девушки, стоявшей в нескольких метрах от основной толпы.
Но одна из незамужних подруг тут же подбеж…
Девчонки, сделала волньюмер.
Кто тоже часто летает или просто замечает ‘поплывший’ овал, рекомендую 🔥 Результат на лицо, как говорится.
Кто какие бьюти-процедуры делает? Как эффект? Может что-то новенькое посоветуете
Забыла показать, как на днях мы с девочками ходили в Большой театр на балет «Спартак».
Очень люблю такие вечера с подругами, нарядились, сходили на балет, потом по классике съели бутербродики с колбасюней 🫠
А вы как обычно любите проводить время с подругами?
Showing the 12 most recent of 176 posts we hold for @borodylia0803. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@borodylia0803 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 September 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@borodylia0803 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Не Kostenko.94 @kostenko1994 · 25,035 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 September 2026
Чат с Дарьей Пынзарь 🌸 @DaryaPinzar86 · 68,983 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 September 2026
irinapingvinova (пингвинята) @pingvinovairina · 36,356 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 1 September 2026
💫 Я вижу жизнь так 💫 @alianaustinenko · 37,363 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 31 August 2026
Oksanabooka @oksanabookafamily · 39,436 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 30 August 2026
ZAVOROVSKAYA @zavorovska · 121,135 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Elle_happy_mom @ellehappymom · 56,578 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 23 August 2026
ANITA KOBELEVA @anitakobelevaa · 62,061 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 August 2026
Marynova888 @marykohno888 · 67,840 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 21 August 2026
evik006 @evik_006 · 66,467 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 21 August 2026
Life с Ханной 💋 @lifewithHanna · 89,373 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
Крис блог🍿 @p_s_krisss · 90,188 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
KRISTI THE ONE ❤️ @dudkovi · 99,599 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026
Курбан Омаров @zimatut · 100,627 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
Варвина Наталья @varvina_n · 195,091 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Виктория Боня @bonyaviktorya · 609,319 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
Anyuta_Rai @anyuta_rai_channel · 29,393 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Кристина Русинович @russinovich_kristina · 132,756 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 6 September 2026
Koroleva Mood @korolevaaamood · 33,957 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 3 September 2026
Елена Санжаровская @sanzhlenazabei · 43,202 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 August 2026
Chaadaeva Maria @chaadaevamaria · 43,672 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
Наталия Антонова @antonova_official · 49,056 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Вы меня спрашивали😁 @samchuk_telegram · 49,974 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 August 2026
Жанна Бадоева я @zhannabadoeva · 57,081 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 313 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ксения Бородина” (@borodylia0803), 915,250 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borodylia0803.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
