Какая классная новость в последний день лета: певица Дора выпустила совместную коллекцию с брендом ECRU! Так что немного Доры этой осенью будет и в наших гардеробах :) В новинках одежда и аксессуары с той самой актуальной клеткой на осень. Сразу выделила для себя несколько айтемов: укороченную куртку и юбку (вот в неё прям влюбилась), вязаный галстук и тканевую сумку. В Москве коллаборация уже представлена офлайн в…

Channel
Стильный Сырник
@mariemets
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,037subscribers
-281 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001540993776 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mariemets |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 46 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mariemets |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 23,037 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:45 | 23,051 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 23,054 | -19 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:09 | 23,073 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:51 | 23,077 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 23,087 | -11 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 23,098 | -7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 23,105 | -18 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 12:18 | 23,123 | -8 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 23,131 | -29 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:06 | 23,160 | -29 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 21:01 | 23,189 | -48 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 23,237 | -71 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 23,308 | -90 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 23,398 | -27 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 23,425 | -50 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 23,475 | -63 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 23,538 | -77 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 23,615 | +55 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 23,560 | first reading |
Engagement
70 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 70 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 14s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,165 reactions across 69 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,363 | 63.0% | |
| 🔥 | 398 | 18.4% | |
| 😍 | 201 | 9.28% | |
| 👍 | 66 | 3.05% | |
| 💘 | 58 | 2.68% | |
| 🤪 | 29 | 1.34% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 0.739% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 0.554% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 0.508% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 0.323% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.185% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 70 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mariemets. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 70 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Про сам показ YuliaWave Было очень атмосферно и красиво! Стилизовала Вика Салават, за макияж (какой же акцентный и роскошный) отвечала Фариза Родригез, за волосы – Дима Абрамович. Делюсь своими образами-фаворитами: очень откликнулась стилизация именно в портретной зоне и детали, детали, детали…
❤15🔥8😍6💘1
Продолжаем нашу total black тему: на днях посетила показ YULIAWAVE x T-Premium Пришлось достать из закромов свои черные вещи. Удивительно, но их в моем гардеробе прям очень мало, всё-таки сама себя больше ощущаю в цвете :)
❤9👍3🔥3😍2
На днях решила устроить себе челлендж и поработать в непривычном для себя стилистическом направлении. Разбирала гардероб Кате, а у неё в арсенале только черный, серый и немного денима :) Ну а в основе стиля - гранж, нулевые, милитари и даркушность. Что применяла в стилизации: - делала упор на аксессуары, - многослойность, - контраст фактур, - контраст стилей (особенно ощущается в украшениях) Как вам образы и вообщ…
❤30😍8🔥6🤪4
Выложила второй дроп на Авито, заглядывайте! Все вещи в отличном состоянии/новые :)
❤19👍5😍3🔥2
А если у вас ещё нет ни одной вещи с этим принтом, ловите идеи, где можно найти: – subbota – chalaia – asya semyonova – askent – sela
❤15👍2😍2💘1
Снова достаем из шкафа вещи с принтом питона, он снова будет актуален в этом сезоне: брюки, юбки, сумки и обувь. Собрала для вас классный стайлинг!
❤26🔥7😍6
Уже знаю, как проведу завтрашний день. А именно – у SANCHY, так как у них стартует SAMPLE SALE! Прочла, что ребята традиционно представят экспериментальные и эталонные образцы, а также архивные изделия в своем офлайн-пространстве. Пропустить точно нельзя! Сохраняйте: с 28 по 30 августа на Петровском бульваре, 19/2, стр. 1 🙌
❤10😍3🔥2👍1
Когда не решила – образ на спорт или на работу :) в итоге в ход пошло сразу два стиля 😅 На мне: Плащ - Ptaxx Рубашка - Uset Шорты - Sporty & Rich Сумка - Step Borg Кепка - Calvin Klein Гольфы - Befree Кроссовки - Onitsuka Tiger #мои_лучки
❤22🔥6😍4
Хочу напомнить, что, если вдруг у вас не грузятся здесь посты, их можно посмотреть в моем канале Стильный Сырник в МАХ. Пост со свежей подборкой стильных ТикТоков, кстати, уже тоже там есть. Буду очень благодарна вашей поддержке, мои дорогие стильные сырнички! 🫶🏻 Не теряемся!
❤11👍3
Вашему вниманию 8 классных мужских лучков из Lime, чтобы ваши вторые половинки тоже знали, что покупать и как носить. В мужском стайлинге предлагаю не делать дикий овердрессинг (да и мужчины в большинстве своём его не хотят и не понимают), а комбинировать понятно, удобно и функционально. Собственно, всё, как они любят :) Но я не удержалась, вы меня знаете, с цветом всё же поиграла. Признавайтесь, какой лук нравитс…
🔥44❤13😍5
Ой, девочки… мне стало мало женской стилизации, я решила взяться за мужчин!
❤31🔥16💘5
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @mariemets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mariemets edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 17 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 17 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@larakrasnikova_style · 36,3642 postsКрасавица и Уходище
@beautybyliza · 21,8151 postИрина | Зауютить 🕯
@casacozy · 30,6641 postполный бомонд
@keyt_tut · 12,6001 postLIMÉ
@limestorecom · 93,7791 postLIU JO OFFICIAL
@liujoofficial · 9891 postШОППЕР НАСТИ
@shopperNasti · 16,1581 postVSE PROSTO
@vseprostojew · 431 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@itsstylish · 9,071#1
@marinariyss · 10,247#2
@girl_who · 80,494#3
@vonplatee · 17,124#4
@moda_marketingg · 32,350#5
@privetbeauty · 5,437#6
@fashion_leowe · 9,088#7
@willbestyle · 9,092#8
@byeva · 26,346#9
@lifestylewhat · 46,001#10
@leopardhunt · 37,869#11
@fashioninn · 22,773#12
@fashiondnevnik · 26,090#13
@azalial · 42,619#14
@bird_doesnt_doze · 24,196#15
@misvia · 13,195#16
@leushinastylist · 48,217#17
@vrednayamoda · 188,523#18
@ohmariee · 10,450#19
@kulturaodevatsa · 32,145#20
@glamoramablog · 28,969#21
@katieshaa · 10,527#22
@stylewithmary · 19,611#23
@fashion_mur · 206,399#24
@welcometoyourselfff · 33,512#25
@lookinaesthetics · 42,542#26
@shmotcacki · 10,794#27
@SrareItYana · 5,101#28
@keselmankatya · 14,441#29
@burimovasasha · 80,807#30
@cultdress · 18,217#31
@rogov24 · 185,771#32
@ubochnaya · 3,893#33
@mariannaeliseeva · 94,649#34
@strelets_molodec · 351,230#35
@lifestyleandme · 4,729#36
@tdmood · 21,484#37
@dressedto · 41,085#38
@korolevatsvetaeva · 27,660#39
@shmotkinet · 14,132#40
@nyurkafashion · 14,693#41
@sncmag · 300,667#42
@wearfeelings · 69,879#43
@VITA_PISHET · 23,878#44
@alisa_arts · 9,331#45
@modnolezhu · 13,313#46
@zashmot · 106,300#47
@buy_pray_love · 45,958#48
@retailthe · 4,476#49
@Viva_la_vika · 43,415#50
@kudriashovaa · 22,974#51
@stylistsdiary · 4,284#52
@hotcouture · 22,682#53
@pueliri · 7,088#54
@viviviviviviva · 7,364#55
@hipsdonotlie · 16,645#56
@localdress · 32,921#57
@woundedbyfashion · 10,333#58
@sophiaganzburg · 37,014#59
@marinagolomazdina · 119,420#60
@durilkatryaposhnaya · 1,606#61
@istominakarina · 156,228#62
@mnenaddo · 8,048#63
@vstalaipohla · 32,922#64
@partiastylia · 14,728#65
@ianapro_fashion · 5,416#66
@modnayacoma · 26,239#67
@limestorecom · 93,779#68
@devilwearshandm · 72,146#69
@oksanarim1 · 35,853#70
@spletni_tg · 187,560#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fashioninn · 22,773
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 September 2026
@fashiondnevnik · 26,090
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 September 2026
@irmadaily · 26,272
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 September 2026
@byeva · 26,346
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
@girl_who · 80,494
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
@style · 157,792
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@ya_b_kupila · 22,371
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@outfits · 206,186
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@bird_doesnt_doze · 24,196
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
@hotcouture · 22,682
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
@aimclo_telegram · 37,932
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
@daisyknit · 43,817
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 6 September 2026
@elizabethbelaya · 20,597
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 September 2026
@VITA_PISHET · 23,878
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 September 2026
@vavdeyukekaterina · 32,661
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
@welcometoyourselfff · 33,512
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 September 2026
@russianmoda · 191,301
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@korolevatsvetaeva · 27,660
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026
@vrednayamoda · 188,523
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@sashganinstyle · 23,782
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 17 September 2026
@wearfeelings · 69,879
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
@hacking_fashion · 33,216
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@mariannaeliseeva · 94,649
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
@rogov24 · 185,771
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стильный Сырник” (@mariemets), 23,037 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mariemets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.