Ежедневная подборка модных и доступных образов от @anitagloss
Анита Глосс — модный инфлюенсер, владелец самой крупной сетки телеграм-каналов о моде.
Сотрудничество: @agatamilonova
Created
7 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
21 measurements spanning 21 days, net -2,285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 196,956–199,927 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 19:07
197,299
-75
26 Aug 2026, 20:55
197,374
-100
25 Aug 2026, 20:24
197,474
-90
24 Aug 2026, 18:05
197,564
-202
22 Aug 2026, 23:57
197,766
-163
21 Aug 2026, 15:44
197,929
-103
20 Aug 2026, 17:35
198,032
-112
19 Aug 2026, 16:25
198,144
-121
18 Aug 2026, 15:23
198,265
-81
17 Aug 2026, 18:26
198,346
-127
16 Aug 2026, 16:57
198,473
-132
14 Aug 2026, 22:38
198,605
-35
13 Aug 2026, 13:35
198,640
-104
12 Aug 2026, 15:16
198,744
-376
11 Aug 2026, 15:41
199,120
-92
10 Aug 2026, 13:48
199,212
-92
9 Aug 2026, 13:21
199,304
-110
8 Aug 2026, 13:36
199,414
-115
7 Aug 2026, 14:58
199,529
-50
6 Aug 2026, 16:15
199,579
first reading
Engagement
87 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.75%
avg views ÷ 197,299 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,420
87 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 87 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
87 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
471,510
Reactions total
4,431
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈16,800
Videos
≈503
Links
≈4,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 53s
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,431 reactions across 87 posts, in 72 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,191
49.4%
👍
939
21.2%
🔥
278
6.27%
👎
108
2.44%
❤🔥
62
1.40%
🥰
40
0.903%
👏
37
0.835%
🤮
33
0.745%
💯
31
0.7%
🥴
31
0.7%
💩
27
0.609%
🎉
26
0.587%
😱
25
0.564%
🤔
25
0.564%
👨💻
22
0.497%
🫡
22
0.497%
🕊
20
0.451%
😨
20
0.451%
🤯
20
0.451%
💘
19
0.429%
52 further kinds
455
10.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,431reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 87 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @russianmoda. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 87 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
27.6%
24 of 87 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
24
posts carrying an erid · 8 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,590
over 24 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,430
over 63 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2bL9aMPo2e49hMef4pezSqxFri
9
4 August 2026
27 August 2026
F7NfYUJRWmqqH7eNuaVh
7
6 August 2026
15 August 2026
2bL9aMPo2e49hMef4peV7YgjPA
2
3 August 2026
19 August 2026
MvGzQC98w3Z1gMq1kwWVVxvz
2
10 August 2026
13 August 2026
2Vtzqw9qaRH
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
5jtCeReLm1S3Xx3LfVkzjYr
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
5jtCeReNwxHpfQTFQPLRPRy
1
9 August 2026
9 August 2026
F7NfYUJRWmqqH8Ke4tFH
1
17 August 2026
17 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Идеи от Аниты для стильной осени деткам.
Для меня осень — это особенное время магии, уюта и, конечно же, самых фотогеничных детских образов! 🍂
Обожаю этот период, когда можно забыть про скучные душные вещи и создавать для малышей те самые эстетичные, многослойные луки. Главное правило нашей осени — чтобы одежда была невероятно мягкой, теплой и не сковывала движения во время веселых игр на площадке и прыжков по листь…
Многослойность по мужски: рубашка как второй слой
Парни, честно? Нет ничего проще и привлекательнее в мужском стиле, чем умение сочетать слои. Обычная футболка с джинсами — это просто база. Но стоит накинуть сверху правильную расстегнутую рубашку, и образ моментально становится сложнее, интереснее и визуально дороже.
Секрет в балансе: нижний слой должен сидеть аккуратно по фигуре, а верхний — оставаться достаточно с…
Находка дня от Аниты - поло с длинным рукавом
Просто идеальный баланс между расслабленным стритстайлом и стилем преппи. Обожаю вещи, которые выглядят аккуратно за счет воротничка, но при этом добавляют образу правильной дерзости. Бонусом — укороченный крой шикарно подчеркивает талию и визуально удлиняет ноги (особенно с высокой посадкой).
С чем планирую носить:
• С широкими джинсами и кедами на каждый день
• С тенни…
Представили новую коллекцию гравировок Альфа-Банк x Marcelo Miracles. На САМОЙ БЛЕСТЯЩЕЙ вечеринке года ❤️🪩
Всё, что блестит, снова в моде. Соединили моду и стиль на новой вечеринке Альфа-Банк x Marcelo Miracles — получилось блестяще.
Построили на Crystal Party собственный генератор блеска — кастом-станцию Альфа-Банка. Футболки и худи из совместной коллекции Marcelo Miracles x Альфа-Банк покрывались стразами и блес…
Образ с кожаными пиджаком от Лизы
Сегодняшний аутфит — про баланс дерзости и комфорта, который я так люблю.
Главный герой дня — объемный кожаный пиджак. Обожаю то, как грубоватая фактура кожи мгновенно собирает образ и делает его характерным. Чтобы уйти от банальных сочетаний, рифмую его с костюмными бермудами. Длина до колена — идеальный способ показать ноги, но остаться в рамках элегантности.
Вниз — лаконичный баз…
Топ материалов на осенний сезон
Уже чувствуете осеннюю прохладу? 🍂 Время доставать уютные вещи!
Подготовила личный топ материалов, которые согреют и сделают образ стильным этой осенью:
Шерсть и кашемир: Мой главный выбор для пальто и свитеров. Ищите меринос или альпаку — они невероятно мягкие и отлично держат тепло.
Вельвет и деним: Обожаю вельветовые рубашки. Они добавляют образу красивую фактуру и идеальны для пе…
«Снежная Королева» в этом сезоне — это любовь. Серьёзно🤍
Я всегда уважала их за качество материалов, но сейчас они расширились до полноценного модного пространства, и это именно то, чего не хватало. Теперь здесь можно купить всё: от пальто до обуви и аксессуаров. И всё на высоком уровне.
Палитра — отдельный комплимент: молочный, бежевый, карамель, оливковый, хаки, а акценты — бордовый и рыжий.
Мне особенно понрави…
Стильный Plus Size: образы с пиджаками на любой случай
Часто замечаю, что в поисках идеального пиджака мы все сталкиваемся с одними и теми же задачами, независимо от размера. Нам всем одинаково важны хорошая посадка, четкая линия плеч и ткань, которая держит форму.
Пиджак — это, пожалуй, самый прямой способ мгновенно собрать любой аутфит. Правильный крой одинаково хорошо работает и на стандартных параметрах, и в плю…
Многослойность с корсетом в горошек от Аниты
Сегодня экспериментирую с многослойностью! За основу взяла простую черную футболку, а сверху надела корсетный топ в кокетливый горох — обожаю этот контраст расслабленности и женственности.
Вниз — легинсы со штрипками, которые я натянула прямо поверх туфель на высоком каблуке, чтобы максимально вытянуть силуэт. Ну а финальным штрихом стала акцентная красная сумка, которая …
В детстве (и сейчас тоже) я обожала Bratz. И как же это круто, когда теперь я могу одеть саму себя как куколку. Сегодня она ковбой.
P.S. спасибо моей команде за такой подарочек)
Сумка: Lime
Джинсы: 2mood
Ремень, топ, нарукавники: Befree
Подборка на скидках - в этот раз брюки.
Хорошие брюки — вещь коварная. Когда они нужны срочно, под конкретный повод или сезон, найти идеальную посадку по полной стоимости становится настоящим квестом. То длина не та, то ткань кажется слишком тонкой для своей цены. А вот на сейлах можно без лишней спешки примерить те модели, на которые раньше даже не смотрела, и спонтанно найти «ту самую» пару, которая идеально сядет…
Парные луки на 1 сентября
Кажется, подготовка к первому сентября вышла на новый уровень! Пока школьная форма для ребенка ждет своего часа на вешалке, мы с мужем внезапно переключились на себя. И решили: почему бы не устроить стильный родительский family look?
Мне безумно нравится идея парных образов для мам и пап. Нет, мы не планируем одеваться в одинаковые костюмы-двойки (хотя это было бы забавно). Хочется чего-то …
❤47👍11🥰5❤🔥2☃1🍌1👨💻1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @russianmoda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько стоит обновить гардероб в масс маркете?26%
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Девочки, какие темы хотела бы обсудить на следующей неделе?
Аксессуары в стиле спорт шик16%
Правила подбора сумок35%
Какая длина брюк актуальна в этом сезоне?25%
Модные сочетания в цветах33%
Как подготовить гардероб к осени?62%
The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 145,007 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dresses @dresses · 50,854 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 August 2026
Outfits @outfits · 214,308 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
Style @style · 164,818 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
ZARINA @zarina_brand · 78,676 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 25 August 2026
Раздетый стилист Лена Червова @elennne_style · 101,877 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
СТИЛИСТ JENNYHAET @jennyhaet · 47,393 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
ЛОСКУТОВА МАРИЯ @loskutova_maria · 93,273 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
ШопагоLee @ShopahoLee · 44,999 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Гимнастика для лица @anyclass_faceonline · 470,125 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Fresh Fashion @fashion · 137,868 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
YesDressNoStress | Стася Кульбацкая @yesdressnostress · 48,290 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Русская мода” (@russianmoda), 197,299 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russianmoda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.