Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 43 days, net +161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,226–9,447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:17
9,412
-9
14 Sept 2026, 09:40
9,421
+41
10 Sept 2026, 23:59
9,380
+31
6 Sept 2026, 01:17
9,349
+7
2 Sept 2026, 01:15
9,342
+16
29 Aug 2026, 19:53
9,326
+12
26 Aug 2026, 23:35
9,314
-2
24 Aug 2026, 00:54
9,316
-10
20 Aug 2026, 15:45
9,326
+11
17 Aug 2026, 22:47
9,315
+19
15 Aug 2026, 05:46
9,296
+28
12 Aug 2026, 02:53
9,268
+11
9 Aug 2026, 10:52
9,257
-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:42
9,259
+8
6 Aug 2026, 10:17
9,251
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:03
9,251
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.19%
avg views ÷ 9,412 subscribers
Avg views / post
394
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
19 (29 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
394
Reactions total
22
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,330 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
477
35.9%
😍
314
23.6%
custom 5386578413039420973
154
11.6%
custom 5262838609945325803
139
10.5%
custom 5262980305211384752
135
10.2%
custom 5463208257461988873
77
5.79%
🤣
31
2.33%
custom 5294214784856649592
3
0.226%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,330 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @reshape_family. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
sos wow boom 💥
что может быть прекраснее новости, что на тренировку + экскурсию по Таганке освободилось пару мест на сегодня и завтра!
ловим последние теплые деньки, нахаживаем шаги, прокачиваем мозг и наполняемся энергией города
29 августа | 11:25 пилатес > «Неочевидная Таганка»
30 августа | 11:50 красивая осанка > «Неочевидная Таганка»
кто успех — тот и на тренировку сходил, и архитектурно просветился, и сделал…
а я иду шагаю по Москве! продолжи песню 🍃
в сентябре продолжаем наши тренировки + экскурсии вместе с «Москва глазами инженера»
Арбат, Таганка, Сретенка, Октябрьская, Новослободская — выбирай свою студию, тренировку и маршрут
листай расписание, сохраняй даты и оставляй свой комментарий — мы отправим тебе подробную информацию 🫀
понедельник мог бы выглядеть так, если бы ты не была такой осознанной и дисциплинированной reshape queen
поэтому план на сегодня:
- утренняя тренировка для запуска продуктивности
- ритуалы в бьюти-зоне для запуска glow
- бодрящий кофе для запуска себя
- и цок-цок дальше по своим делам!
всем good week ❤️🔥
мы нашли место, где даже самую жесткую силовую тренировку не хочется заканчивать 🗺️
[Алтааааааай] — мы физически вернулись, но все мысли еще там: горы, свежий воздух, рассветы, любимые тренеры, самые отважные RESHAPE QUEENS иии наши любимчики друзья, которые смогли добавить этому туру еще больше любви!
ma:nyo и bhab добавили в этот тур ритуалы заботы о себе, потому что даже в самых экстремальных условиях и активных…
качественно потянулись, а после включили режим городского исследователя 🗺️ и отправились учиться читать язык архитектуры — на экскурсию по Пречистенке
что это, если не идеальный вечер пятницы?
soooo в воскресенье продолжим прокачивать не только тело, но и мозг:
встречаемся на красивой осанке на Таганке в 11:50, а после идем на экскурсию по району
шок, но освободилось 2 места 🥹 записаться можно здесь
Сначала мы бежим по делам мимо города, а потом жалуемся, что не успеваем жить. Узнала себя?
Мы знаем, как это исправить: живи моментом, остановись, насладись городом и его архитектурой, узнай секреты районов, по которым ходишь каждый день и впусти жизнь в свое тело!
Записывайся на тренировку 14 и 16 августа, а после отправляйся с «Москва глазами инженера» на экскурсию по району
Сначала мы тренируем тело, а после т…
выходной наших RESHAPE QUEENS уже традиционно прошёл во дворце — на этот раз практиковали йогу под живые звуки рояля 🎹
а наши друзья d’Alba снова подготовили роскошные подарки для каждой спортсменки — чтобы напоминать: любовь к себе начинается с маленьких ежедневных ритуалов
если хочется провести свой выходной красиво, насыщенно и по-настоящему по-королевски — save the date: 27 сентября — записаться на тренировку
…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @reshape_family. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Спортивные выходные @sweekend_online · 44,789 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Мой спортивный район @moysportrayon · 31,872 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RESHAPE FAM” (@reshape_family), 9,412 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reshape_family.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
