Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Историк Мод Анатоль Вовк

Channel

Историк Мод Анатоль Вовк

@istorikmod

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,999subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537016799
TypeChannel
Username@istorikmod
DescriptionИсторик Моды Анатоль Вовк https://www.youtube.com/c/AnatoleVovque Сотрудничество @pr_vovque_bot [email protected] https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6799a3e89c7c3e5603c4bd1e
Created4 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held54
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/istorikmod

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

25,94826,02125,984.56 August 2026 — 25,976 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,976 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,983 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,990 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,986 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,981 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,976 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,970 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,967 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,948 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,963 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,954 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,950 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,972 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,968 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,955 subscribers24 August 2026 — 25,952 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,007 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,018 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,019 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,013 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,006 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,007 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,018 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,013 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,016 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26,018 subscribers7 September 2026 — 26,007 subscribers10 September 2026 — 25,993 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,990 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25,986 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,988 subscribers29 September 2026 — 25,968 subscribers5 October 2026 — 25,991 subscribers13 October 2026 — 26,014 subscribers14 October 2026 — 26,017 subscribers15 October 2026 — 26,021 subscribers17 October 2026 — 26,008 subscribers18 October 2026 — 26,002 subscribers19 October 2026 — 25,993 subscribers20 October 2026 — 25,998 subscribers21 October 2026 — 26,001 subscribers22 October 2026 — 25,991 subscribers23 October 2026 — 25,988 subscribers24 October 2026 — 25,993 subscribers26 October 2026 — 25,991 subscribers27 October 2026 — 25,994 subscribers29 October 2026 — 25,993 subscribers30 October 2026 — 25,994 subscribers31 October 2026 — 25,993 subscribers1 November 2026 — 25,996 subscribers2 November 2026 — 25,991 subscribers3 November 2026 — 25,990 subscribers4 November 2026 — 25,999 subscribers25,9996 August 20264 November 2026
54 measurements spanning 90 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,937–26,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 17:3025,999+9
3 Nov 2026, 15:0625,990-1
2 Nov 2026, 18:0725,991-5
1 Nov 2026, 19:0825,996+3
31 Oct 2026, 21:0525,993-1
30 Oct 2026, 18:2625,994+1
29 Oct 2026, 17:0125,993-1
27 Oct 2026, 14:0625,994+3
26 Oct 2026, 16:3725,991-2
24 Oct 2026, 18:5725,993+5
23 Oct 2026, 17:4625,988-3
22 Oct 2026, 15:4925,991-10
21 Oct 2026, 06:5126,001+3
20 Oct 2026, 02:1825,998+5
19 Oct 2026, 01:5725,993-9
18 Oct 2026, 00:1826,002-6
17 Oct 2026, 00:4526,008-13
15 Oct 2026, 23:2826,021+4
14 Oct 2026, 23:3726,017+3
13 Oct 2026, 16:0526,014first reading

Engagement

231 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.90%
avg views ÷ 25,999 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
97 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
97
of 231 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held231 (4 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total123,643
Reactions total6,646
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈26,600
Videos
≈2,310
Links
≈1,480

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 22m
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 68 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,812 reactions across 230 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10,14760.4%
🔥2,60415.5%
👍1,5339.12%
😢5333.17%
👏4072.42%
😱2741.63%
🤔2441.45%
🥰2301.37%
😍1680.999%
🤯1520.904%
😁1300.773%
🕊1110.66%
🙏860.512%
🤩700.416%
💯600.357%
🎉270.161%
🤣220.131%
👌140.083%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 230 of the 231 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,812 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 231 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
246
across the posts below
Posts paid on
52
of 231 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
73
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @istorikmod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 231 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 97 posts held from the last 30 days (4.12%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 17:32 UTC439 views32 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

К зимним праздникам Джонатан Андерсон решил превратить кампанию Dior в полноценную сказку. Режиссёром мультфильма Christian Dior’s Night in Color стал Сильвен Шоме, автор «Трио из Бельвилля» и «Иллюзиониста», а озвучивать персонажей пригласили целую компанию знаменитостей. Так Роберт Паттинсон стал рассказчиком, Рианна озвучила счастливую звезду (один из символов Dior), а Луи Гаррель и Камий Коттен воплотили Кристиа…

❤31👏1

4 Nov 2026, 14:53 UTC708 views30 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026
Photo

Ещё одна праздничная кампания, на этот раз от Dolce & Gabbana. Всё в лучших традициях бренда: много золота, роскоши, праздничного блеска и романтики. В ролике, снятом Гордоном фон Штайнером, действие разворачивается в нарядном гостиничном лобби, где случайные встречи оборачиваются тайными поцелуями. Кажется, Dolce & Gabbana уже готовы к Рождеству.

❤22🔥6🥰2

4 Nov 2026, 13:22 UTC929 views69 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026
Video

Прощай эпоха Coperni.

😢56🕊9😱4

4 Nov 2026, 13:14 UTC965 views56 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Бренд Coperni прекращает работу после затяжного конфликта с дистрибьютором и мажоритарным акционером Tomorrow. Причиной стали невыплаченные бренду суммы и расторжение лицензионного соглашения. Основатели марки Арно Вайан и Себастьян Мейер сообщили об этом на странице бренда и поблагодарили всех, кто поддерживал Coperni на протяжении восьми лет.

😱44😢9❤3

3 Nov 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,290 views169 reactions3 Starsread 4 November 2026
Video

Продолжаю вашу любимую рубрику «Что на вас». И сегодня в кадре её герой - я. Побывал в Москве в отеле Stella di Mosca на презентации новой коллекции Falconeri. На мне, конечно, костюм Falconeri. Но сегодня мне хочется не только рассказать о своём образе, но и немного расспросить вас. За каким контентом вы приходите ко мне? ❤️ - обзоры коллекций 🤩 - подборки фильмов 🔥- искусство и картины 🥰- рубрика «Что на вас и г…

❤65🙏60🔥22🥰13🤩9

3 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,310 views61 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Этой ночью в Нью-Йорке прошла ещё одна красная дорожка - премьера второго сезона сериала «Всё честно». Среди гостей вечера Ким Кардашьян в кастомном Ashi Studio, Сара Полсон в Roksanda, Гленн Клоуз в Matières Fécales, Тейяна Тейлор в Nicholas Oakwell Couture и Наоми Уоттс в Mugler.

❤47👍9🥰4🤔1

3 Nov 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,340 views64 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Отдельно на церемонии отметили Энтони Ваккарелло наградой International Designer of the Year за десятилетнюю работу в Saint Laurent. Дизайнер появился на вечере в компании своих муз - Хейли Бибер, Зои Кравиц, Розэ и Ани Рубик. Все четыре гостьи выбрали образы из его последней золотой коллекции для Saint Laurent.

❤54👍10

3 Nov 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,120 views52 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

В Нью-Йорке прошла церемония CFDA Fashion Awards 2026 - одна из главных наград американской модной индустрии. Среди победителей этого года: Рэйчел Скотт получила награду за лучший дизайн женской одежды за бренд Diotima, Ральфа Лорена отметили в категории мужской одежды, а Ану Хури - в номинации аксессуаров. Звание лучшего молодого дизайнера получила Коллин Аллен. Среди гостей вечера - Джулия Фокс в Miss Claire Sull…

❤38🔥9🥰4👍1

2 Nov 2026, 18:53 UTC804 views46 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Как известно, у Александра Маккуина подиум редко ограничивался демонстрацией одежды. Дизайнер превращал показы в настоящие театральные постановки, где были место мрачным сюжетам и тревожной атмосфере. Маккуин умел создавать зрелище, от которого одновременно невозможно было отвести взгляд и немного не по себе. Об этом и других этапах жизни и творчества британского дизайнера рассказал в полном выпуске об Александре Ма…

❤23🔥13👍10

2 Nov 2026, 15:14 UTC981 views58 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Рождественская кампания с королевой зимних праздников - Мэрайей Кэри. На этот раз для Gucci, и это уже само по себе неожиданно. В новом видео режиссёра Хармони Корина звучит, конечно же, All I Want for Christmas Is You. Теперь точно - сезон рождественских кампаний официально открыт.

❤45👍8🔥4🥰1

2 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC974 views50 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Бренды уже начинают готовиться к сезону зимних праздников. Например, Chloé представили кампанию с Клаудией Шиффер в главной роли. Под руководством креативного директора Чемены Камали, которой пророчат пост креативного директора Saint Laurent, фотограф Дэвид Симс создал атмосферную историю о вечерней стороне бренда. Камали обращается к более загадочному образу женщины Chloé, в котором естественность сочетается с вече…

❤34👍12🥰4

1 Nov 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,400 views150 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Сделал подборку фотографий известных людей, которые вы могли не видеть. Поделитесь с теми, кто их узнает.

❤91🔥42👍16😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 231 posts we hold for @istorikmod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@istorikmod edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @istorikmod as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

VOGUE-religion
@religion_vogue · 23,848
#1
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 300,063
#2
MUR
@fashion_mur · 205,502
#3
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 381,400
#4
Mukhins
@mukhinss · 54,457
#5
suharevstyle
@suharevstyle · 25,574
#6
A L E K Ó
@aleko_n17 · 101,068
#7
BURO.
@Buro247_ru · 25,481
#8
Будни Гальяно
@budnigalliano · 27,793
#9
KSUSHA SMO
@styledbysmo · 38,691
#10
Надя, подскажи
@nady_fashionfaculty · 8,617
#11
Луис Иванович
@LIVfashionmag · 193,421
#12
Bon Mot
@lebonmot · 36,900
#13
Olga Krayzman
@olgakrayzman · 25,914
#14
Сорока-барокко
@SorokaBarokko · 18,771
#15
Мода — любая погода
@aboutfashionprofession · 1,553
#16
Drunk_fashion
@drunkfashion · 40,032
#17
Maybe Art
@maybeart · 4,754
#18
ROGOV
@rogov24 · 185,051
#19
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,976,053
#20
The Blueprint News
@theblueprintnews · 72,389
#21
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 349,728
#22
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,173,719
#23
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,547
#24
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,060,017
#25
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,281
#26
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 121,649
#27
Бабкин Престол 2.0
@babkin_prestol · 67,284
#28
ПОЗАВЧЕРАШНИЕ НОВОСТИ/МАША МИНОГАРОВА😎
@MinogarovaNews · 94,055
#29
Джонни детка
@Johnny4ekak · 65,497
#30
Долецкая-Doletskaya
@alionadol · 75,482
#31
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 156,589
#32
The Blueprint
@theblueprintru · 96,560
#33
GOSHA KARTSEV
@goshakartsev · 87,413
#34
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 171,178
#35
ШМОТ
@zashmot · 105,660
#36
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 486,057
#37
ROGOV.NEWS
@rogov_news · 30,665
#38
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 317,451
#39
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,215
#40
РАМУЗЫКА
@RamusicRu · 75,649
#41
mironovanastasiia
@mironovanastasiia · 145,913
#42
OLGA SHU
@olga_shuranova · 48,277
#43
Дьявол носит H&M
@devilwearshandm · 71,961
#44
Marianna Eliseeva
@mariannaeliseeva · 94,448
#45
superficial space cadet
@superficialspacecadet · 24,933
#46
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 969,438
#47
Проект Шмеля - Катя Конасова
@proektshmel · 119,924
#48
LINADEMBIKOVA
@linadembikova · 13,157
#49
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,148
#50
Osd
@theosdnew · 47,511
#51
Бабская курилка
@kureelka · 124,304
#52
ÖMANKÖ
@omanko · 113,024
#53
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 102,616
#54
NISNEVICH
@nisnevic · 7,838
#55
Мари Новосад
@novosadmari · 18,279
#56
Тим Ильясов
@timiliasov · 16,034
#57
PEOPLETALK
@Peopletalkru · 183,918
#58
Печенюшки&Co
@pechenuwki · 36,670
#59
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 503,418
#60
Кинокостюм для чайников
@kinocostume · 38,998
#61
Мамкина модница
@mamkina · 29,838
#62
«Карьера» The Blueprint
@theblueprintcareer · 143,788
#63
Журнал «Москвичка»
@moskvichka_mag · 104,444
#64
Модные хроники Злой Киски
@zlayakiska · 74,877
#65
RedAutumn
@olyaredautumn · 107,354
#66
Отдел стиль жизни
@lifestylewhat · 45,805
#67
Модный подкаст
@modnypodcast · 19,508
#68
Дневник Лауры Д
@Lauradjagadiary · 75,615
#69
Fresh Fashion
@fashion · 132,176
#70
Будни модельера
@egorjchhh · 11,808
#71
В ее стиле
@inherstyle · 4,726
#72
Гуд морнинг, Карл!
@goodmorningkarl · 55,817
#73
Roma of Superposition
@romaofsuperposition · 13,107
#74
СЕРГЕЙ НАУМОВ
@naumita · 58,819
#75
Marina Golomazdina
@marinagolomazdina · 119,118
#76
Сделай лицо попроще
@straightface · 21,157
#77
Светский интроверт
@svintrovert · 83,497
#78
Copy Me
@copyme · 26,684
#79
Безфильтров
@bezfiltrov_show · 28,872
#80
Ксения Соловьёва
@ksenia_solovieva · 51,829
#81
Front Fashion
@frontfashion · 18,131
#82
НЕПРОЗАМУЖ
@mortalbeauty · 46,519
#83
СИНЬКА
@thynk · 69,609
#84
KK
@kseniadenisovna · 33,244
#85
EvelinaFashionSchool
@EvelinaFashionSchool · 87,270
#86
РазразиМеняМаржела
@arbuzimargiela · 20,681
#87
Jewellery Digest
@jeweldigest · 21,446
#88
Правила жизни
@pravilamagru · 63,718
#89
Лавриченко
@pasexpert · 5,102
#90
Olga Karput 🥬
@okarput · 31,150
#91

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Olga Krayzman
@olgakrayzman · 25,914
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Александр Васильев | Официальный канал
@alexandre_vassiliev1 · 23,628
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026
Siberian Teacher / Сибирский Учитель 👩🏻‍🏫
@siberianteacher_history · 19,129
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 October 2026
Модный подкаст
@modnypodcast · 19,508
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Историк Мод Анатоль Вовк” (@istorikmod), 25,999 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/istorikmod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.