Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NISNEVICH

Channel

NISNEVICH

@nisnevic

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Declared links · Cite this entry

7,826subscribers

-564 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001489739031
TypeChannel
Username@nisnevic
DescriptionПонять суть: @howtosocialbot
Created15 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nisnevic

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,8268,3908,1088 August 2026 — 8,390 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,387 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,338 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,322 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,284 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,268 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,214 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,174 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,158 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,149 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,131 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,069 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,036 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,007 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,981 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,962 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,926 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,912 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,899 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,889 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,881 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,869 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,847 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,838 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,826 subscribers8 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net -564. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,741–8,475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 03:277,826-12
1 Nov 2026, 21:547,838-9
30 Oct 2026, 03:497,847-22
26 Oct 2026, 22:517,869-12
23 Oct 2026, 23:507,881-8
21 Oct 2026, 08:417,889-10
18 Oct 2026, 07:367,899-13
15 Oct 2026, 10:267,912-14
12 Oct 2026, 12:597,926-36
5 Oct 2026, 20:007,962-19
28 Sept 2026, 11:417,981-26
19 Sept 2026, 03:228,007-29
15 Sept 2026, 00:388,036-33
11 Sept 2026, 20:008,069-62
7 Sept 2026, 04:198,131-18
2 Sept 2026, 20:468,149-9
30 Aug 2026, 12:298,158-16
27 Aug 2026, 18:168,174-40
24 Aug 2026, 21:058,214-54
21 Aug 2026, 04:538,268first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 7,826 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held23 (25 April 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total2,037
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 00:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,280
Videos
≈338
Links
≈1,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

758 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5375318271509668027758100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 758 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nisnevic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 April 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC507 views21 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Выхожу из отпуска со словом живым про Меланью Трамп «Редакции»: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alTz2yeRYDw Рассказываю, как из «трофейной жены» Меланья превратилась в занятую CEO, у которой просто нет времени на такие дурости, как обложка Vogue

custom 537531827150966802721

11 Oct 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,530 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Я собрала уже больше 20 крутых персонажей и обновила всю систему сбора Легенд для соцсетей Встречайте Тритмент 2.0 Мое самое большое обновление Октября: Тритмент 2.0 – это бренд-паспорт и библия вашего персонажа для соцсетей. Вам больше не нужно гадать, как собрать воедино ваши увлечения, работу и отпуска – все ложиться на одну четко выстроенную плоскость и воспринимается гармонично (круто, да?) Тритмент я собир…

custom 537531827150966802716

18 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC≈2,080 views25 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Харизма это не тип личности, это чек-лист. Следуешь ему - харизматичный, нет - нет. Все на основе исследований: Метаанализ Боно и Джаджа (2004) — 26 выборок и 384 корреляции доказали, что черты «Большой пятерки» определяют восприятие лидера лишь на малую долю; ключевую роль играют риторические паттерны (Charismatic Leadership Tactics). Исследование Фридмана, Принса, Риджио и ДиМаттео (1980) — харизма напрямую за…

custom 537531827150966802725

12 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC≈2,010 views24 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Хороший контент работает как дорогая сумка Мне никогда не нравился термин «личный бренд». Что-то в этом есть потребительское, хотя мы говорим о человеке. Но штука в том, что, когда мы выходим в эфир и что-то умное рассказываем в соцсетях, мы именно что ведем себя как товар. Точнее, наш контент – это товар. И, как у товара, у нас может быть хорошее УТП и позиционирование. А может быть плохое: вторичное, неумело ско…

custom 537531827150966802724

11 Sept 2026, 06:51 UTC≈1,640 views30 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Три мысли, которые должен вызывать крутой контент Ученые вывели три пункта и три подпункта, которые действуют как волшебство: заставляют на вас подписываться, у вас покупать, рассказывать про вас, короче жить и дышать вами. К слову, проверено на контент-сессиях с клиентами: в начале сессии мы изучаем посты и аккаунты, которые нравятся, и там всегда вылезают эти три пункта. Вам нужно вызвать у человека три мысли: «…

custom 537531827150966802730

9 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTC≈1,640 views32 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Три проверенных шага, как свести с ума любого блогера После того, как Трамп победил во второй раз на выборах, многие университетские кафедры, изучающие принятие решения и манипуляции нарративами, кинулись изучать соцсети. И выяснили, что при правильной последовательности действий можно почти любого автора склонить не просто на свою сторону – его можно довести до крайнего состояния. Например, ожирения, как тут, или …

custom 537531827150966802732

7 Sept 2026, 19:11 UTC≈1,680 views62 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @postwintourPhoto

Креативный директор бренда ZNWR столкнулась с хейтом в соцсетях — после того, как в аккаунте бренда появился ее личный пост. Наста Шастак рассказала о том, что совмещает работу креативного директора с материнством, живет брендом и постоянно работает: начинает день в 6:20, спит в машине по дороге на работу, трудится около 15 часов в сутки без выходных, в довесок встает по ночам к маленькому сыну. В комментариях деву…

custom 537531827150966802762

7 Sept 2026, 19:11 UTC≈1,490 views13 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Подушню, но очень похоже на механизм, про который я недавно читала: humblebrag Так называют скрытое хвастовство через жалобу. И у ненависти к хамблбрэгу есть научное (!) исследование: Sezer, Gino, Norton, «Humblebragging: A Distinct – and Ineffective – Self-Presentation Strategy», Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2018, том 114, № 1, с. 52–74, DOI 10.1037/pspi0000108. Полный текст в открытом доступе лежи…

custom 537531827150966802713

7 Sept 2026, 04:51 UTC≈1,840 views27 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Дэн Кахан из Йеля еще в 2013 году показал: люди потребляют и обрабатывают информацию не для того, чтобы разобраться в теме, а для того, чтобы защитить свой статус в значимой для них группе. Эксперимент: тогда он собрал 1750 американцев и отправил их проходить тест на когнитивную рефлексию (CRT), и затем их просили сообщать свои политические взгляды. Следующий этап эксперимента был следующий: им давали описание этого…

custom 537531827150966802727

25 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈2,030 views23 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

я ищу контент для своего телеграма 8 лет это делаю, и вот опять. Открываю план действий; «пункт №1»: отсмотреть «сохраненки» (сейчас взяла инсту, а так я сохраняю еще ют, пинтерест, статьи, новости и отчеты перплексити) - то что я сохранила себе, почти не вникая. Напоминаю себе для чего я вообще ищу контент. Тема моего блога – это ведение соцсетей для заработка. Или как я говорю, экономика внимания и креаторская эк…

custom 537531827150966802723

24 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈1,750 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

ну и ваши отзывы – я еще раз поняла, что я делаю что-то нужное и правильное <3

custom 537531827150966802716

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @nisnevic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @nisnevic as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
25 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
9 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

suharevstyle
@suharevstyle · 25,581
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
shoes&drinks
@shoesanddrinks · 27,067
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Olga Krayzman
@olgakrayzman · 25,930
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Сделай лицо попроще
@straightface · 21,156
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
Модный подкаст
@modnypodcast · 19,494
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
Осовцов говорит
@osovtsovgovorit · 80,480
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
Vika Chuma
@chumavecherinka · 19,405
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
Историк Мод Анатоль Вовк
@istorikmod · 26,001
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Безфильтров
@bezfiltrov_show · 28,858
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
superficial space cadet
@superficialspacecadet · 24,953
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Гуд морнинг, Карл!
@goodmorningkarl · 55,755
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NISNEVICH” (@nisnevic), 7,826 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nisnevic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.