Channel
@jeweldigest
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,562subscribers
-300 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001352363631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jeweldigest |
| Created | 22 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jeweldigest |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 21,562 | -22 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 21,584 | -73 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 21,657 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 21,659 | -6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 21,665 | -15 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 21,680 | -13 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 21,693 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 21,701 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:34 | 21,700 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 21,704 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 21,714 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 21,718 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 21,725 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 21,731 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 21,738 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 21,743 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 21,747 | -16 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 21,763 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 21,768 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 21,775 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,235 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 602 | 48.7% | |
| 🔥 | 398 | 32.2% | |
| 👍 | 235 | 19.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А кольцо на Кэти Перри хоть и не помолвочное, но интересное – это винтажный экземпляр из коллекции американского дилера Joseph Saidian & Sons, бриллиантовый треугольник в центре весит 2,45 карата.
❤78🔥36👍9
Джастин Трюдо и Кэтти Перри счастливы вместе на кинофестивале TriBeCa в Нью-Йорке
❤46👍7
Диана Вишнёва на обложке июньского номера «Как потратить», который распространяется вместе с сегодняшним номером газеты «Ведомости», в серьгах Sutra Jewels и браслетах Yeprem с бриллиантами и сапфирами (съемка в дворцовых интерьерах, к слову, сопровождается эксклюзивным интервью примы-балерины Мариинского театра и создательницы фестиваля современной хореографии Context. Diana Vishneva).
🔥53❤22👍22
С Днём Победы! Традиционно в этот день рассказываем о «Победе» – высшем военном ордене Советского Союза, учреждённом 8 ноября 1943 года. Им награждались особо отличившиеся полководцы за успешные операции в масштабах фронта или нескольких фронтов. Орден был вручён 20 раз 17-ти кавалерам (трое награждались дважды), включая Брежнева (его этого ордена лишили посмертно). Это очень дорогой орден и в самом прямом смысле, …
❤167🔥55👍22
Напомним, кстати, что тему орхидей в ювелирном искусстве в конце XIX века раскрыл Полдинг Фарнем под эгидой Tiffany & Co. В Викторианскую эпоху коллекционирование орхидей – довольно дорогое хобби – было в большой моде среди аристократов, что превратило этот цветок в один из символов статуса. Облечь его в ювелирную форму и придумал Фарнем. В 1889 году он отправил на Всемирную выставку в Париже 24 драгоценные орхидеи,…
🔥51❤35👍9
Шедевры из коллекций высокого ювелирного искусства Bvlgari, Van Cleef & Arpels, Cartier, Vhernier, Boucheron, Dior, Fred, Chanel, Repossi, De Beers и причудливые формы орхидей. Фото: Guido Mocafico/Numéro
❤89🔥46👍23
Брошь на Марии Захаровой отечественная, между прочим. Это «Василёк» из коллекции «Русских самоцветов» из серебра и эмали.
👍107❤65🔥40
Ого! Какой ВАСИЛЕК.
🔥17❤8👍5
Для ценителей брошей: переключаем внимание с Центробанка на МИД.
❤40🔥14👍13
Юлия Снигирь на обложке майского номера «Собаки» в бриллиантовых серьгах Yeprem.
🔥86❤52👍18
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @jeweldigest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jewellery Digest” (@jeweldigest), 21,562 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jeweldigest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.